July 25, 2025

Purpose-Driven Innovation: Niki Santo's Biotech Journey (Swaza)

Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player iconYouTube podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player iconYouTube podcast player icon

In this insightful episode, Rishad Usmani sits down with Niki Santo, co-founder and CEO of Swaza, a Silicon Valley biotechnology startup. Niki shares her compelling personal journey, marked by profound loss and a head injury in 2020, which led her to redefine her life's purpose and pivot into biotech entrepreneurship.

Niki Santo: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nikivsanto/ Swaza: https://www.swaza.life/ Rishad Usmani: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishadusmani/ HealthTech Investors: https://www.healthtechinvestors.com/ LearningwithRishad: https://www.learningwithrishad.com/

WEBVTT

00:00:02.399 --> 00:00:05.580
Thanks for joining me today, Nikki. Hey, Rashad,

00:00:05.620 --> 00:00:10.060
great to be here. As we said today, you are leading

00:00:10.060 --> 00:00:14.199
a biotechnology startup at the forefront of medicine.

00:00:14.839 --> 00:00:19.850
How did you get here? Well, it's an interesting

00:00:19.850 --> 00:00:23.010
story. I actually am the co -founder and CEO

00:00:23.010 --> 00:00:25.649
of Swaza, which is based in Mountain View, California,

00:00:26.170 --> 00:00:28.690
Silicon Valley biotechnology startup. But how

00:00:28.690 --> 00:00:31.129
I came to it actually was as the first outside

00:00:31.129 --> 00:00:37.219
investor to the company. And the story really

00:00:37.219 --> 00:00:40.359
starts in COVID, as many of the stories today

00:00:40.359 --> 00:00:44.039
start. But in my case, in 2020 is the year that

00:00:44.039 --> 00:00:47.500
I call my Jobin year, because in that year, I

00:00:47.500 --> 00:00:51.659
lost my mom very early to COVID. To tell you

00:00:51.659 --> 00:00:54.240
how early it was when she passed in Virginia,

00:00:54.880 --> 00:00:58.159
they wrote about it in the Washington Post with

00:00:58.159 --> 00:01:01.679
two other people, because it was so exotic to

00:01:01.679 --> 00:01:05.150
actually have someone die from SARS -CoV -2.

00:01:05.569 --> 00:01:10.209
In that same year, I lost all of my dependents

00:01:10.209 --> 00:01:13.129
who lived with me. They were older dependents.

00:01:13.870 --> 00:01:18.090
And I suffered a head injury where I had to relearn

00:01:18.090 --> 00:01:21.349
how to walk again. I had so many different life

00:01:21.349 --> 00:01:23.969
changes in that one short period of time. I found

00:01:23.969 --> 00:01:28.950
myself at the end of 2020. alone with the mirror

00:01:28.950 --> 00:01:31.950
and God and asking the question, you know, when

00:01:31.950 --> 00:01:35.150
we lose those aspects of our identity that we

00:01:35.150 --> 00:01:38.950
define our daily lives by, then who are we really?

00:01:39.290 --> 00:01:42.450
And at the end of that time, I sort of just realized

00:01:42.450 --> 00:01:45.109
that, well, whatever I have or I haven't done

00:01:45.109 --> 00:01:46.969
or whatever I've achieved, I haven't achieved.

00:01:47.269 --> 00:01:51.250
I'm a steward. We don't really own anything.

00:01:51.829 --> 00:01:54.489
It's all on loan to us, time, money, resources,

00:01:55.189 --> 00:01:58.670
and talent. So I thought, well, what I need to

00:01:58.670 --> 00:02:01.069
do is basically spend whatever time I do have,

00:02:01.189 --> 00:02:03.950
whether it's 10 years or 100 years, it's all

00:02:03.950 --> 00:02:07.489
really short, building things that matter. And

00:02:07.489 --> 00:02:11.770
so I radically changed what my Focus was on,

00:02:11.770 --> 00:02:13.810
I radically changed the things I was investing

00:02:13.810 --> 00:02:17.490
in. I had a very different risk profile and risk

00:02:17.490 --> 00:02:21.550
appetite. And it wasn't really for money, but

00:02:21.550 --> 00:02:25.189
it was for impact. And so in parallel, at that

00:02:25.189 --> 00:02:28.449
same time, my co -founder Jay Rajadas had been

00:02:28.449 --> 00:02:32.889
rapidly trying to race against the clock to develop

00:02:32.889 --> 00:02:38.069
key technologies in response to COVID. a vaccine,

00:02:38.509 --> 00:02:41.050
a therapeutic, a number of other technologies.

00:02:41.250 --> 00:02:43.990
But the fourth technology he developed was this

00:02:43.990 --> 00:02:47.889
nanofluid breathing aid technology. And so when

00:02:47.889 --> 00:02:51.990
we met and converged, it really was about time

00:02:51.990 --> 00:02:58.289
and purpose. And I saw the utility of what we

00:02:58.289 --> 00:03:01.530
were doing in not only in respiratory care, but

00:03:01.530 --> 00:03:04.349
really the approach using these advanced drug

00:03:04.349 --> 00:03:07.530
delivery techniques to really create new kinds

00:03:07.530 --> 00:03:11.349
of therapeutics that really addressed the host

00:03:11.349 --> 00:03:15.090
or the person rather than specific underlying

00:03:15.090 --> 00:03:20.009
biochemical processes of disease as being not

00:03:20.009 --> 00:03:22.969
only very useful, but having huge utility and

00:03:22.969 --> 00:03:27.310
in meeting a huge unmet need. So my journey to

00:03:27.639 --> 00:03:31.240
this type of entrepreneurism rather than having

00:03:31.240 --> 00:03:35.099
it be a progression or departure from something

00:03:35.099 --> 00:03:38.159
that I had been doing before was more of a homecoming

00:03:38.159 --> 00:03:46.860
to a really intentional grounded and purposeful

00:03:46.860 --> 00:03:51.939
approach to not only investing my time but resources

00:03:51.939 --> 00:03:56.259
and an effort into. So when I came upon Swaza

00:03:56.259 --> 00:03:59.560
technology, it wasn't the question, should I

00:03:59.560 --> 00:04:03.259
do this? It was the question, how can I not do

00:04:03.259 --> 00:04:06.379
this? Because this matters. This is what I need

00:04:06.379 --> 00:04:09.479
to be called to build. And so that alignment

00:04:09.479 --> 00:04:13.699
of purpose, that alignment of mission was really

00:04:13.699 --> 00:04:16.699
what drove what drove all of this. Jay, who's

00:04:16.699 --> 00:04:18.819
the inventor of the technology, he spent his

00:04:18.819 --> 00:04:22.180
entire life creating life -giving therapeutics.

00:04:22.199 --> 00:04:25.459
And it's not for money or for fame. It's because

00:04:25.459 --> 00:04:30.240
he wants to see people benefit from good science

00:04:30.240 --> 00:04:34.649
and have better quality of life. So it's a real

00:04:34.649 --> 00:04:38.029
privilege to be able to do this and to represent

00:04:38.029 --> 00:04:41.949
a team of people who have decades of experience

00:04:41.949 --> 00:04:45.209
and passion creating therapeutics and regenerative

00:04:45.209 --> 00:04:51.589
biomaterials. I'm sorry to hear about your mom

00:04:51.589 --> 00:04:57.290
and your family. It sounds like you went through

00:04:57.290 --> 00:05:01.949
a very difficult time. to almost reprogram and

00:05:01.949 --> 00:05:05.889
rewire your thinking and your purpose to a different

00:05:05.889 --> 00:05:10.089
mission. If you're open, maybe talk to me about

00:05:10.089 --> 00:05:15.470
how did you think about purpose in life and how

00:05:15.470 --> 00:05:19.089
did that translate to different career opportunities

00:05:19.089 --> 00:05:26.149
you undertook before? It seems like you did amazing.

00:05:26.389 --> 00:05:30.810
work even before the COVID pandemic, and you

00:05:30.810 --> 00:05:34.430
continue to do amazing work after. To me, it

00:05:34.430 --> 00:05:37.329
looks almost like a linear trajectory, if I'm

00:05:37.329 --> 00:05:40.810
being frank with you, although I'll be in different

00:05:40.810 --> 00:05:44.850
industries and different radicals. How do you

00:05:44.850 --> 00:05:47.310
think about purpose now? And what advice do you

00:05:47.310 --> 00:05:50.730
have to say a 20 -year -old Nikki, if you had

00:05:50.730 --> 00:05:53.610
a chance to talk to her, what would you tell

00:05:53.610 --> 00:05:58.100
her about? purpose and maybe let's, you know,

00:05:58.199 --> 00:06:00.139
feel free to go into the personal side of things

00:06:00.139 --> 00:06:03.519
as well, but if you can give a synopsis on the

00:06:03.519 --> 00:06:07.370
career or the work side of things as well. Well,

00:06:07.629 --> 00:06:10.870
thanks, Rashad. I had been blessed with a very

00:06:10.870 --> 00:06:13.470
good career. I was good at what I did before.

00:06:13.470 --> 00:06:16.170
I was an executive leadership, particularly at

00:06:16.170 --> 00:06:19.269
the intersection of academia and entrepreneurship.

00:06:19.509 --> 00:06:23.670
We were building businesses spinning out of academia

00:06:23.670 --> 00:06:29.149
to actually scale up higher education. This was

00:06:29.149 --> 00:06:31.509
with the growth of online learning, with the

00:06:31.509 --> 00:06:37.050
growth of digital. textbooks, and the growth

00:06:37.050 --> 00:06:40.029
of competency -based education. So we were really

00:06:40.029 --> 00:06:42.389
one of the pioneers that ended up building an

00:06:42.389 --> 00:06:44.769
organization that was sold to University of Massachusetts

00:06:44.769 --> 00:06:49.470
in 2021. And so the educational mission, again,

00:06:49.910 --> 00:06:53.430
it ties back to a sense of purpose, a contribution

00:06:53.430 --> 00:06:59.310
to the world leadership. At the same time, I

00:06:59.310 --> 00:07:04.209
think, in the course of that career, which was

00:07:04.209 --> 00:07:06.750
very meaningful. I think we all reach these certain

00:07:06.750 --> 00:07:10.269
plateaus where you know that you're very good

00:07:10.269 --> 00:07:14.769
at it, but you're not learning more, and that

00:07:14.769 --> 00:07:18.350
the thing more that you should be doing may be

00:07:18.350 --> 00:07:22.089
outside of your comfort zone. And so I had reached

00:07:22.089 --> 00:07:25.509
that point at several different stages in my

00:07:25.509 --> 00:07:29.230
career. And I would always respond to that by

00:07:29.639 --> 00:07:33.199
stepping back and then seeing, given where I

00:07:33.199 --> 00:07:37.860
am right now, what can I do to explore these

00:07:37.860 --> 00:07:42.639
other aspects or talents that I want to cultivate?

00:07:43.579 --> 00:07:46.800
And who are the people that I should be doing

00:07:46.800 --> 00:07:49.620
that with? And that actually led me to a lot

00:07:49.620 --> 00:07:52.660
of my angel investing too. So prior to coming

00:07:52.660 --> 00:07:55.839
on board with Swaza, I had been doing a number

00:07:55.839 --> 00:08:02.060
of investments. investor with a little I, but

00:08:02.060 --> 00:08:05.300
you know, I had had the fortune of being just

00:08:05.300 --> 00:08:08.160
being in the Silicon Valley, right, persisting,

00:08:08.480 --> 00:08:10.519
getting getting some wins in that that area,

00:08:10.600 --> 00:08:13.319
which then, you know, rolled into my entrepreneurial

00:08:13.319 --> 00:08:17.139
journey at swaza. But to tell the 20 year old

00:08:17.139 --> 00:08:21.860
self, I actually have one of the really profound

00:08:21.860 --> 00:08:24.199
joys that I have is when I talk to young people.

00:08:24.519 --> 00:08:26.399
A couple of years ago, I was invited to University

00:08:26.399 --> 00:08:28.819
of Chicago at the Booth School of Business to

00:08:28.819 --> 00:08:30.759
meet with students there and talk to them about

00:08:30.759 --> 00:08:33.759
their journeys. And what I actually told those

00:08:33.759 --> 00:08:36.799
students, and this is something that I did after

00:08:36.799 --> 00:08:40.899
that profound year in 2020 at the end, was I

00:08:40.899 --> 00:08:45.879
sat and I made a list of everything that I wanted

00:08:45.879 --> 00:08:55.360
to do, be, and see like in terms of achievement

00:08:55.360 --> 00:08:58.940
and these are not necessarily a career achievements,

00:08:58.940 --> 00:09:02.759
but I didn't want to die before I knew this list

00:09:02.759 --> 00:09:07.299
of things that I had touched upon them and. It

00:09:07.299 --> 00:09:09.980
and it had to be a very honest list. It wasn't

00:09:09.980 --> 00:09:12.100
about what would look good to somebody on the

00:09:12.100 --> 00:09:16.159
outside. You know, the house car, everything

00:09:16.159 --> 00:09:18.679
that it wasn't from the outside in. It was from

00:09:18.679 --> 00:09:21.299
the inside out and having to sit and very be

00:09:21.299 --> 00:09:25.399
very honest with that list. And I sat at one

00:09:25.399 --> 00:09:28.320
point and I wrote and I kept writing and I kept

00:09:28.320 --> 00:09:33.720
writing just each line a different thing until

00:09:33.720 --> 00:09:37.139
I found myself starting to repeat things. That

00:09:37.139 --> 00:09:42.279
means I had exhausted that. And that became what

00:09:42.279 --> 00:09:47.360
I call the list, not very creative. But the interesting

00:09:47.360 --> 00:09:51.379
thing is when I committed to that sense of vision,

00:09:51.820 --> 00:09:56.799
that real true heart list, that's when everything

00:09:56.799 --> 00:09:59.620
really shifted for me that brought me to this

00:09:59.620 --> 00:10:03.549
part of my journey. Some of the things on the

00:10:03.549 --> 00:10:06.250
list were actually quite outlandish and ridiculous,

00:10:06.610 --> 00:10:08.509
like things I would have never imagined happening,

00:10:09.110 --> 00:10:14.149
but they felt truly aspirational to me. And the

00:10:14.149 --> 00:10:16.190
interesting thing is that over the course of

00:10:16.190 --> 00:10:18.750
time, I started noticing even those outlandish

00:10:18.750 --> 00:10:21.850
things on the list actually start to happen,

00:10:21.889 --> 00:10:24.889
because there was a fundamental truth, I think,

00:10:25.309 --> 00:10:29.659
from the inside out and then connecting. With

00:10:29.659 --> 00:10:31.919
the world that you live in and the life that

00:10:31.919 --> 00:10:34.639
that you you live in it there's there's an alignment

00:10:34.639 --> 00:10:38.320
there so i tell young people. Spend time making

00:10:38.320 --> 00:10:42.679
that list and be 100 % honest with yourself and

00:10:42.679 --> 00:10:45.080
then if you think you want something stop and

00:10:45.080 --> 00:10:49.960
say why do i want that is is it because i'm supposed

00:10:49.960 --> 00:10:53.769
to want that. Because social media tells me to

00:10:53.769 --> 00:10:56.230
want it, or whatever, or my classmates in my

00:10:56.230 --> 00:10:57.830
grad school tell me that that's what I should

00:10:57.830 --> 00:11:02.970
aspire to, or do I really want it? And it can

00:11:02.970 --> 00:11:06.269
be simple things as well. So my list ranges from

00:11:06.269 --> 00:11:09.590
the outlandish, about building my company, et

00:11:09.590 --> 00:11:13.750
cetera, to just small daily rituals of like,

00:11:14.450 --> 00:11:16.830
well, I want to have nice flowers in my house

00:11:16.830 --> 00:11:20.230
every week. Like, down to that level of detail,

00:11:20.269 --> 00:11:22.990
it somehow is important to my soul. I put it

00:11:22.990 --> 00:11:26.710
on the list. So that's what I tell young people.

00:11:26.730 --> 00:11:28.909
And that's what I tell myself, because that was

00:11:28.909 --> 00:11:32.549
a transformative process for me. And I still,

00:11:33.269 --> 00:11:36.750
every day, every morning, I put that list in

00:11:36.750 --> 00:11:40.529
front of me. Because you need that on the entrepreneurial

00:11:40.529 --> 00:11:43.370
journey, as you probably know yourself, to remind

00:11:43.370 --> 00:11:47.009
you, what am I doing? Why? Where does this come

00:11:47.009 --> 00:11:49.980
from? and every morning I put in front of me.

00:11:50.159 --> 00:11:55.019
And that's what orients my thinking that day.

00:11:57.200 --> 00:12:00.799
That's fascinating. And I'm someone who struggles

00:12:00.799 --> 00:12:04.320
with routine a lot. Every day is different, and

00:12:04.320 --> 00:12:08.330
I kind of like it that way. Which isn't ideal

00:12:08.330 --> 00:12:12.269
because often I get into Friday and I have 30

00:12:12.269 --> 00:12:17.289
things to do and I'm up till midnight. How do

00:12:17.289 --> 00:12:21.970
you think about routine and having say weekly

00:12:21.970 --> 00:12:25.750
or monthly goals or even daily goals as opposed

00:12:25.750 --> 00:12:29.970
to more going with the flow to an extent and

00:12:29.970 --> 00:12:32.370
just kind of seeing where the opportunities and

00:12:32.370 --> 00:12:35.480
problems lie in both here. personal and business

00:12:35.480 --> 00:12:39.600
life and dealing with those as they come? Yeah,

00:12:39.600 --> 00:12:41.220
that's a really good question because I think

00:12:41.220 --> 00:12:48.720
like you my natural tendency is to want to Not

00:12:48.720 --> 00:12:53.159
be limited by routine and then as an entrepreneur

00:12:53.159 --> 00:12:58.080
you can't really have professionally a routine

00:12:58.080 --> 00:13:01.120
as you would in a corporate environment where

00:13:01.820 --> 00:13:04.799
I know that these sort of set meetings are what

00:13:04.799 --> 00:13:08.039
I need to get to in order to, quote, do a good

00:13:08.039 --> 00:13:14.299
job. In a startup, which is not a company, it's

00:13:14.299 --> 00:13:16.519
a startup. It's building something that doesn't

00:13:16.519 --> 00:13:21.679
exist yet. You need to get to the milestone.

00:13:21.899 --> 00:13:25.159
You need to solve the problem. You need to address

00:13:25.159 --> 00:13:28.159
the the situation, whether it's equipment in

00:13:28.159 --> 00:13:31.519
your lab or if it's closing an investment. And

00:13:31.519 --> 00:13:33.659
those things can be very stochastic and they

00:13:33.659 --> 00:13:37.899
are the enemy of routine. What I found probably

00:13:37.899 --> 00:13:40.740
be more helpful rather than the routine itself

00:13:40.740 --> 00:13:47.919
is to have a very stable mental model about how

00:13:47.919 --> 00:13:51.360
you manage your objectives and time or effort

00:13:51.360 --> 00:13:55.299
rather. And I think effort and energy That's

00:13:55.299 --> 00:13:59.559
now what I think about things more. And so I

00:13:59.559 --> 00:14:02.519
was not, for example, prioritizing my health

00:14:02.519 --> 00:14:04.639
very early in the startup. It was all living

00:14:04.639 --> 00:14:07.379
very cognitively trying to just focus on the

00:14:07.379 --> 00:14:11.820
work of and the thousand different things that

00:14:11.820 --> 00:14:16.700
you need to pay attention to. But I realized

00:14:16.700 --> 00:14:20.000
that having a proper routine for my sleep, my

00:14:20.000 --> 00:14:24.440
diet, my exercise, if I didn't have that, then

00:14:25.289 --> 00:14:29.970
I couldn't support this cognitive life that had

00:14:29.970 --> 00:14:31.870
to drive. I couldn't make the right decisions.

00:14:32.090 --> 00:14:35.870
I couldn't have the right level of energy to

00:14:35.870 --> 00:14:41.570
do what I need to do. So it was more aligning

00:14:41.570 --> 00:14:46.049
to the bigger goal and then having that be what

00:14:46.049 --> 00:14:50.240
drives the sense of routine. And then also having

00:14:50.240 --> 00:14:52.980
some flexibility and then having those habits.

00:14:53.059 --> 00:14:56.299
So I like to think about things more in terms

00:14:56.299 --> 00:15:02.940
of a weekly container. What are the priorities

00:15:02.940 --> 00:15:06.940
for the week according to the role that I'm playing?

00:15:09.200 --> 00:15:15.940
And I'm a student of 1990s management theory.

00:15:16.779 --> 00:15:23.200
So like the Franklin Covies of the world, in

00:15:23.200 --> 00:15:28.679
1995, Intel had adopted this kind of universal

00:15:28.679 --> 00:15:30.840
time management system, which was called the

00:15:30.840 --> 00:15:33.039
Franklin system. This was ultimately acquired

00:15:33.039 --> 00:15:36.000
by Stephen Covering and became Franklin Covey.

00:15:36.000 --> 00:15:40.460
But that kind of model of having understanding

00:15:40.460 --> 00:15:46.000
what the important things are versus what's urgent.

00:15:46.730 --> 00:15:50.889
Did you explain the system to us? Yeah. So this

00:15:50.889 --> 00:15:54.450
paradigm is kind of understanding the difference

00:15:54.450 --> 00:15:56.370
between important and urgent. There are things

00:15:56.370 --> 00:15:58.870
that are both important and urgent. Those have

00:15:58.870 --> 00:16:01.950
to be top of mind. There are things that are

00:16:01.950 --> 00:16:05.730
urgent just because they're emerging contingencies

00:16:05.730 --> 00:16:09.009
and exigencies, but they're not necessarily important.

00:16:09.370 --> 00:16:11.909
They're little fires. But then there are things

00:16:11.909 --> 00:16:16.759
that are Neither important nor nor urgent or

00:16:16.759 --> 00:16:19.679
not strategic but oftentimes these take up a

00:16:19.679 --> 00:16:23.580
lot of our our time meaningless meanings pro

00:16:23.580 --> 00:16:27.610
forma kinds of things random emails but. because

00:16:27.610 --> 00:16:30.769
their activity, they can feel productive. And

00:16:30.769 --> 00:16:34.649
so the paradigm that I found very useful was,

00:16:34.750 --> 00:16:36.669
I think, one developed by Stephen Covey himself

00:16:36.669 --> 00:16:39.850
was called the big rocks, where you focus on

00:16:39.850 --> 00:16:42.629
what the big rocks are in your week, like the

00:16:42.629 --> 00:16:44.370
big things that you know have to get done that

00:16:44.370 --> 00:16:46.649
are really important. And then everything else

00:16:46.649 --> 00:16:50.509
gets organized around them. And then sort of

00:16:50.509 --> 00:16:53.669
organizing things by the week tend to be the

00:16:53.669 --> 00:16:58.250
right time scale for me, because then the day,

00:16:58.769 --> 00:17:01.629
you can slot things into the day. But as long

00:17:01.629 --> 00:17:04.029
as you feel that you are in the right direction

00:17:04.029 --> 00:17:06.910
for the week, I tend to find that that's been

00:17:06.910 --> 00:17:11.170
my sweet spot in terms of routines and in organizations.

00:17:11.450 --> 00:17:13.910
It's still a work in proc, still a work in process

00:17:13.910 --> 00:17:17.569
and progress. You know, I have colleagues who

00:17:17.569 --> 00:17:21.609
are very routinized, and I kind of admire them

00:17:21.609 --> 00:17:28.640
from afar for consistency. But that's what I

00:17:28.640 --> 00:17:34.900
do for me. There's a common mantra in this world

00:17:34.900 --> 00:17:36.960
or in this ecosystem that says, you know, move

00:17:36.960 --> 00:17:40.039
fast, break things, have a strong bias to action.

00:17:41.110 --> 00:17:44.430
And from an experiential perspective, I feel

00:17:44.430 --> 00:17:48.369
like that can go wrong very often in health care,

00:17:48.549 --> 00:17:51.369
because often you don't get second chances if

00:17:51.369 --> 00:17:54.950
you move fast or break things. And I have a very

00:17:54.950 --> 00:17:56.829
strong bias to action, so I have to temper this

00:17:56.829 --> 00:18:01.150
bias. Sometimes I need to plan a bit more before

00:18:01.150 --> 00:18:05.480
I launch a new product or even simple things

00:18:05.480 --> 00:18:08.180
like editing this podcast. I need to spend some

00:18:08.180 --> 00:18:12.200
time editing it and listening to it, coming up

00:18:12.200 --> 00:18:16.279
with some promotional materials. How do you think

00:18:16.279 --> 00:18:19.960
about bias to action versus bias to planning?

00:18:20.740 --> 00:18:23.819
I like Adam Grant's philosophy of moderate procrastination

00:18:23.819 --> 00:18:27.519
here. I don't know if I like it because that

00:18:27.519 --> 00:18:30.619
resonates with me, but how do you think about

00:18:30.619 --> 00:18:35.940
kind of these two opposites of planning or just

00:18:35.940 --> 00:18:40.920
acting right away? I think probably my experience

00:18:40.920 --> 00:18:44.920
is that overall a bias towards action tends to

00:18:44.920 --> 00:18:49.480
move the ball down the field. But a bias towards

00:18:49.480 --> 00:18:53.160
action isn't an excuse for lack of very intentional

00:18:53.579 --> 00:18:56.240
thinking and planning because you can move the

00:18:56.240 --> 00:18:58.380
ball the wrong direction. You could score the

00:18:58.380 --> 00:19:02.519
wrong goal, but probably on average, it's better

00:19:02.519 --> 00:19:07.960
to move than to keep still. That's just been

00:19:07.960 --> 00:19:14.859
my experience. I think procrastination is probably

00:19:14.859 --> 00:19:18.420
inevitable with any kind of thinking work that

00:19:18.420 --> 00:19:22.750
requires deep, deep thinking. And anywhere you're

00:19:22.750 --> 00:19:26.190
dealing with an unknown, that is, in fact, what

00:19:26.190 --> 00:19:29.970
you're mulling over. Where there could be multiple

00:19:29.970 --> 00:19:34.910
possibilities for a problem or a solution, you

00:19:34.910 --> 00:19:38.809
can't just act your way towards a solution sometimes.

00:19:38.809 --> 00:19:42.269
You have to think through, iterate, create small

00:19:42.269 --> 00:19:47.230
experiments, sort of test a hypothesis, and move

00:19:47.230 --> 00:19:52.819
forward. But I think the world as it's structured

00:19:52.819 --> 00:19:57.960
now is made for people who take action. And we

00:19:57.960 --> 00:20:01.279
know this intuitively. Is it always the most

00:20:01.279 --> 00:20:06.200
clever, the most competent, the most qualified

00:20:06.200 --> 00:20:15.880
who win the prize or win the game? No, it's often

00:20:15.880 --> 00:20:18.880
people who reach out and take. Take it right

00:20:18.880 --> 00:20:25.480
and that said. You know we want we want people

00:20:25.480 --> 00:20:28.240
to be thoughtful I don't believe in breaking

00:20:28.240 --> 00:20:31.700
things and we're in and you and I are in the

00:20:31.700 --> 00:20:37.220
sort of the health. You know field right where

00:20:37.220 --> 00:20:39.480
it's not about breaking things about first doing

00:20:39.480 --> 00:20:43.539
no harm and so. That's a guiding principle for

00:20:43.539 --> 00:20:46.299
us. Whatever we build, we need to make sure we

00:20:46.299 --> 00:20:50.680
spend the time. And if it takes longer, that

00:20:50.680 --> 00:20:54.920
it's 100 % absolutely safe. And it's 100 % absolutely

00:20:54.920 --> 00:20:57.799
we are confident that it's not going to cause

00:20:57.799 --> 00:21:01.460
harm. Or if there are harms, we understand every

00:21:01.460 --> 00:21:05.380
aspect of that potential harm. I think even if

00:21:05.380 --> 00:21:10.039
you're not building a medical technology, that's

00:21:10.039 --> 00:21:15.059
a good stance to adopt. And I think more builders,

00:21:15.279 --> 00:21:19.140
more engineers should think of that first. Why

00:21:19.140 --> 00:21:21.700
am I doing this? And what is the broader impact

00:21:21.700 --> 00:21:25.539
of what I'm doing? And therefore, I should force

00:21:25.539 --> 00:21:28.119
myself to slow down where it matters so that

00:21:28.119 --> 00:21:31.880
I don't create unintended consequences for what

00:21:31.880 --> 00:21:36.539
I build. Yeah, unintended consequences and downstream

00:21:36.539 --> 00:21:39.220
effects of what you build are critical in healthcare.

00:21:39.960 --> 00:21:42.099
You said something in the previous answer that

00:21:42.099 --> 00:21:45.740
I really like is activity can feel like progress.

00:21:45.940 --> 00:21:50.559
I feel like founders, sometimes they seek external

00:21:50.559 --> 00:21:53.019
validation more than internal validation. And

00:21:53.019 --> 00:21:55.140
by internal, I mean, internal company validation,

00:21:55.759 --> 00:21:58.900
which is, you know, does this drive revenue growth?

00:22:00.269 --> 00:22:03.069
Is the internal team aligned on the strategies

00:22:03.069 --> 00:22:06.109
we're foreseeing and is everyone happy? Is the

00:22:06.109 --> 00:22:09.829
team happy? Are we getting along? Sometimes I'll

00:22:09.829 --> 00:22:11.529
meet founders and then I see they're jumping

00:22:11.529 --> 00:22:14.329
from pitch competition to pitch competition and

00:22:14.329 --> 00:22:18.069
stage to stage and I go, oh no, these guys or

00:22:18.069 --> 00:22:21.970
these girls, they're going for the external validation

00:22:21.970 --> 00:22:26.470
of speaking on stage and winning. You know, usually

00:22:26.470 --> 00:22:29.130
these pitch competitions are $1 ,000 to $5 ,000

00:22:29.130 --> 00:22:33.569
as opposed to, and their team is staying back

00:22:33.569 --> 00:22:36.089
and working. And you can kind of see the path

00:22:36.089 --> 00:22:39.589
there. And usually it does not work out. Maybe

00:22:39.589 --> 00:22:43.049
let's give you a scenario. Let's say you got

00:22:43.049 --> 00:22:46.750
invited to JP Morgan Mainstage keynote speaker

00:22:46.750 --> 00:22:50.559
for Swaza. So something that maybe could. move

00:22:50.559 --> 00:22:52.819
the needle for revenue in some aspects, or at

00:22:52.819 --> 00:22:54.519
least from an investor perspective, although

00:22:54.519 --> 00:22:56.900
I would argue raising money is not the goal.

00:22:58.460 --> 00:23:01.660
It's a signal, but it doesn't really move the

00:23:01.660 --> 00:23:06.640
needle that much. There is some internal team

00:23:06.640 --> 00:23:11.460
dynamics at play that urgently happen that kind

00:23:11.460 --> 00:23:13.359
of need your attention to fix them. You know,

00:23:13.359 --> 00:23:16.240
your co -founders are fighting or something that

00:23:16.240 --> 00:23:18.960
I'm sure happens with every startup at some point.

00:23:19.720 --> 00:23:21.619
What do you pick and how do you kind of think

00:23:21.619 --> 00:23:24.880
about external validation and internal validation?

00:23:24.920 --> 00:23:27.039
And I'll kind of wrap this whole question up

00:23:27.039 --> 00:23:31.019
and with one more caveat, given that marketing

00:23:31.019 --> 00:23:35.460
matters and the world that we live in is designed

00:23:35.460 --> 00:23:38.539
where people make emotional decision and organizations

00:23:38.539 --> 00:23:41.400
make emotional decisions as well. And brand and

00:23:41.400 --> 00:23:47.680
marketing is important. I think your last caveat

00:23:47.680 --> 00:23:51.619
is so important and is so often under looked.

00:23:51.660 --> 00:23:55.279
And I'll get to that. But when you said JP Morgan

00:23:55.279 --> 00:23:58.799
main stage, sorry, the building can be on fire.

00:23:58.960 --> 00:24:02.579
I'll be on that main. that main stage. That's

00:24:02.579 --> 00:24:04.920
an opportunity you don't really pass up. But

00:24:04.920 --> 00:24:07.759
joking aside, that points to the bigger point,

00:24:07.819 --> 00:24:12.140
which is being selective about those stages.

00:24:12.359 --> 00:24:14.619
And you always have to tie it back to the mission

00:24:14.619 --> 00:24:16.099
of the company, what you're actually trying to

00:24:16.099 --> 00:24:22.900
achieve at that point. People and team, you're

00:24:22.900 --> 00:24:27.460
not going to achieve anything without them. making

00:24:27.460 --> 00:24:29.680
sure those things are taken care of. And we've

00:24:29.680 --> 00:24:36.680
had critical points where on the surface, all

00:24:36.680 --> 00:24:41.720
the external things were great. But I knew if

00:24:41.720 --> 00:24:47.420
we didn't address some internal dynamic, that

00:24:47.420 --> 00:24:53.339
surface success was going to disappear. quickly,

00:24:53.440 --> 00:24:57.960
or it would evaporate. And so sometimes doing

00:24:57.960 --> 00:25:01.420
the deep work of really realigning everybody,

00:25:02.980 --> 00:25:09.339
and myself included, actually, is important at

00:25:09.339 --> 00:25:12.640
key touch points. And then being able to also

00:25:12.640 --> 00:25:16.380
reflect back, because oftentimes, particularly

00:25:16.380 --> 00:25:19.880
in the startup world, we're running to the next

00:25:19.880 --> 00:25:23.079
thing. We're winning, but then there's you climb

00:25:23.079 --> 00:25:24.880
one mountain. You see the seven others. You've

00:25:24.880 --> 00:25:28.599
got to climb still and you don't stop. You have

00:25:28.599 --> 00:25:32.279
to stop and reflect back because you can't keep

00:25:32.279 --> 00:25:36.880
everybody with you, right? And with this, if

00:25:36.880 --> 00:25:40.420
you can't step back and and really in gratitude,

00:25:41.119 --> 00:25:44.319
see where you've come from that that that's really,

00:25:44.799 --> 00:25:48.440
really important. But your last point about.

00:25:48.680 --> 00:25:51.700
Well, the marketing and the story, I think there's

00:25:51.700 --> 00:25:56.359
obviously two extremes where when you say like,

00:25:56.420 --> 00:26:00.099
what gets measured gets done oftentimes in a

00:26:00.099 --> 00:26:05.339
very media rich environment and an information

00:26:05.339 --> 00:26:10.579
heavy environment. What you post and what seems

00:26:10.579 --> 00:26:14.839
external looks like what you're measuring. And

00:26:14.839 --> 00:26:18.539
then you create this self sustaining loop where

00:26:18.670 --> 00:26:21.730
the more you do that the more it seems like you're

00:26:21.730 --> 00:26:25.150
making progress and it it tells a good story

00:26:25.150 --> 00:26:30.349
but i i was recently in conversations with a

00:26:30.349 --> 00:26:34.089
very close friend who is the managing director

00:26:34.089 --> 00:26:37.869
of a big investment bank in new york that specializes

00:26:37.869 --> 00:26:41.630
in biotech and he offered me a cautionary tale

00:26:41.630 --> 00:26:46.390
which is from our perspective from the 45th floor

00:26:46.390 --> 00:26:49.049
of people who are going to be financing that

00:26:49.049 --> 00:26:53.369
last three rounds right before IPO or that acquisition.

00:26:54.049 --> 00:26:58.730
We see your activity as a distraction because

00:26:58.730 --> 00:27:01.750
for us we're running the core numbers on your

00:27:01.750 --> 00:27:05.890
primary program and is that particular asset

00:27:05.890 --> 00:27:09.490
going to make money and of sufficient multiples

00:27:09.490 --> 00:27:14.309
on our investment in order to justify the investment.

00:27:14.799 --> 00:27:19.940
And so it can look like and feel like you're

00:27:19.940 --> 00:27:22.759
doing a lot. But if you're ignoring your primary

00:27:22.759 --> 00:27:28.319
business and it's proper feeding and care, we

00:27:28.319 --> 00:27:30.839
are going to see that we can see it because we

00:27:30.839 --> 00:27:34.000
see it all the time. So he literally offered

00:27:34.000 --> 00:27:39.559
me a top down view as a cautionary reminder that

00:27:39.559 --> 00:27:43.140
the external validation and there are a lot of

00:27:44.019 --> 00:27:47.400
It's like founder culture or hustle culture is

00:27:47.400 --> 00:27:50.539
very external, right? I'm doing so much, and

00:27:50.539 --> 00:27:53.420
I'm in this city, and I'm that city. But in the

00:27:53.420 --> 00:27:56.359
end, you're running a business. And you're not

00:27:56.359 --> 00:27:58.759
just running one business. You're running multiple

00:27:58.759 --> 00:28:01.539
potential businesses backwards and forwards,

00:28:01.599 --> 00:28:03.680
because it could be a number of different things.

00:28:04.099 --> 00:28:07.319
And my job as the CEO is to understand every

00:28:07.319 --> 00:28:10.700
business this possibly could be. and then to

00:28:10.700 --> 00:28:13.779
build both forwards and backwards simultaneously

00:28:13.779 --> 00:28:19.420
to what those strategic options are. So as long

00:28:19.420 --> 00:28:21.859
as you can always come back to the center, am

00:28:21.859 --> 00:28:24.940
I moving the right ball down the right field

00:28:24.940 --> 00:28:28.160
at the right pace? Then that's the guidepost.

00:28:28.200 --> 00:28:30.599
But you do have to check back in with yourself

00:28:30.599 --> 00:28:33.839
because you can end up spending two quarters

00:28:33.839 --> 00:28:39.819
on the big world tour and get a lot of press.

00:28:40.940 --> 00:28:44.579
But if that press doesn't translate into moving

00:28:44.579 --> 00:28:47.720
the core, the core business down the field or

00:28:47.720 --> 00:28:49.759
the primary program or whatever it is that you're

00:28:49.759 --> 00:28:51.960
actually supposed to be doing at that time, it

00:28:51.960 --> 00:28:56.940
can actually just be a distraction. What is the

00:28:56.940 --> 00:29:01.859
path to exit for swaza? Yeah, so there are a

00:29:01.859 --> 00:29:06.019
couple of different strategic option so that

00:29:06.019 --> 00:29:09.779
it's all situational based on where we find ourselves

00:29:09.779 --> 00:29:12.900
at different inflection points. So our primary

00:29:12.900 --> 00:29:15.460
assets was a one, which is the nanofluid breathing

00:29:15.460 --> 00:29:20.299
aid. We're accelerating that into phase two clinical.

00:29:21.380 --> 00:29:24.940
Studies within the next eighteen months. And

00:29:24.940 --> 00:29:27.880
pending on early readout of those phase two studies

00:29:27.880 --> 00:29:31.960
there are a couple of options one is to already

00:29:31.960 --> 00:29:35.779
strategically partner with the big pharma to

00:29:35.779 --> 00:29:41.039
bring that asset to market to is to also or to

00:29:41.039 --> 00:29:46.670
seek. Then. funding from the public markets to

00:29:46.670 --> 00:29:49.269
then support later clinical trials, which is

00:29:49.269 --> 00:29:53.309
sort of a classic biotech playbook. But this

00:29:53.309 --> 00:29:59.990
was pre -COVID playbook. So you and your audience

00:29:59.990 --> 00:30:02.009
may have heard of Merck's recent acquisition

00:30:02.009 --> 00:30:07.529
of Verona Therapeutics and for their first in

00:30:07.529 --> 00:30:13.799
class COPD drug. And Verona was one of these

00:30:13.799 --> 00:30:16.559
companies that had very good early phase two

00:30:16.559 --> 00:30:20.299
readout. They went public on the NASDAQ in 2017,

00:30:21.079 --> 00:30:24.200
raised $80 million, did their full clinical trials,

00:30:24.220 --> 00:30:26.839
and actually got the drug already approved in

00:30:26.839 --> 00:30:30.599
2024 by the FDA. And it was after that point

00:30:30.599 --> 00:30:33.440
that Merck went in and then acquired them for

00:30:33.440 --> 00:30:38.000
$10 billion. So many multiples over what Merck

00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:40.700
might have had to pay if they had come in earlier.

00:30:41.180 --> 00:30:43.519
Big pharmas, the cost of capital for them is

00:30:43.519 --> 00:30:46.940
much smaller. They can afford to completely come

00:30:46.940 --> 00:30:50.240
into a de -risked asset and acquire it later.

00:30:50.500 --> 00:30:54.799
They have the cash to do that. But that's sort

00:30:54.799 --> 00:30:59.400
of a classic. strategic option for a company

00:30:59.400 --> 00:31:04.380
like Swaza. So it really depends on the gates

00:31:04.380 --> 00:31:07.319
where you cross. What we are hoping for is nice

00:31:07.319 --> 00:31:09.900
early phase two readout. What we would like to

00:31:09.900 --> 00:31:14.059
be able to do is leverage that into much larger

00:31:14.059 --> 00:31:17.339
capitalization to be able to then fuel not only

00:31:17.339 --> 00:31:19.940
that asset, but we have a number of other programs

00:31:19.940 --> 00:31:26.099
because we have technology for wound healing,

00:31:26.180 --> 00:31:29.019
for example, to suffuse wounds and burns with

00:31:29.019 --> 00:31:32.400
oxygen, replicating the benefits of hyperbaric

00:31:32.400 --> 00:31:35.700
oxygen therapy treatment without the hyperbaric

00:31:35.700 --> 00:31:37.940
oxygen chambers. You can imagine that this can

00:31:37.940 --> 00:31:40.799
be very useful for patients with diabetic ulcers,

00:31:41.160 --> 00:31:45.599
for which there actually aren't any topical specifically

00:31:45.599 --> 00:31:49.099
approved for that. Actually, you think of the

00:31:49.099 --> 00:31:54.609
current leading drugs for they actually indicate

00:31:54.609 --> 00:31:57.630
in the labeling that it's not really intended

00:31:57.630 --> 00:32:00.109
for use where there's poor vascularization, for

00:32:00.109 --> 00:32:02.470
example, which kind of defeats the point. That's

00:32:02.470 --> 00:32:05.849
an area of unmet need that we'd like to address.

00:32:06.490 --> 00:32:09.710
But we also have other advanced delivery technologies

00:32:09.710 --> 00:32:14.990
which are very promising that we want to advance.

00:32:15.069 --> 00:32:17.849
For example, being able to leverage the colon.

00:32:18.299 --> 00:32:21.519
for advanced drug delivery for a number of different

00:32:21.519 --> 00:32:26.039
indications to be able to bypass the liver. And

00:32:26.039 --> 00:32:29.400
then also, we have very advanced sublingual technologies,

00:32:29.539 --> 00:32:31.839
which we can load various peptides and molecules

00:32:31.839 --> 00:32:37.220
on. Again, minimally invasive, noninvasive, bypassing

00:32:37.220 --> 00:32:40.940
the GI tract and the liver. So inhalation route

00:32:40.940 --> 00:32:44.700
of drug delivery, also extremely promising for

00:32:44.700 --> 00:32:47.880
a number of things. So we have a number of really

00:32:47.880 --> 00:32:50.980
exciting projects that we are developing and

00:32:50.980 --> 00:32:53.740
pushing forward. And we want our first asset

00:32:53.740 --> 00:33:00.420
to be the Vanguard to be able to expand all of

00:33:00.420 --> 00:33:05.660
those technologies. For the physicians listening,

00:33:05.960 --> 00:33:09.380
I think we inherently recognize that ventilation

00:33:09.380 --> 00:33:14.180
is kind of the worst way to deliver oxygen. But

00:33:14.180 --> 00:33:18.519
we also then say, well, When we think of something

00:33:18.519 --> 00:33:24.160
like Swaza, you know, nanotherapeutics delivering

00:33:24.160 --> 00:33:27.119
oxygen to the alveoli, it sounds like science

00:33:27.119 --> 00:33:34.759
fiction. Talk to me about, yeah, just talk to

00:33:34.759 --> 00:33:38.480
me a bit more about the technology, about the

00:33:38.480 --> 00:33:41.339
delivery method, and then is the goal to then

00:33:41.339 --> 00:33:47.039
replace? ventilators and intubation and how do

00:33:47.039 --> 00:33:50.319
you kind of think about the initial clinical

00:33:50.319 --> 00:33:53.839
use case and then what's the blue ocean or blue

00:33:53.839 --> 00:33:57.819
sky scenario? Yeah, in essence what we've developed

00:33:57.819 --> 00:34:02.660
with SWASA is a topical breathing egg that comprises

00:34:02.660 --> 00:34:06.319
liquid nanoparticles that can enable dynamic

00:34:06.319 --> 00:34:09.519
gas exchange at the surface. of the lung. So

00:34:09.519 --> 00:34:12.400
we're actually addressing the physical barriers,

00:34:13.119 --> 00:34:15.480
the key universal features of lung injuries.

00:34:15.539 --> 00:34:19.139
So you have fluid buildup, protein buildup, and

00:34:19.139 --> 00:34:21.579
oftentimes scar tissue at the surface, which

00:34:21.579 --> 00:34:24.980
are a physical block from oxygen coming in and

00:34:24.980 --> 00:34:28.820
carbon dioxide leaving. And so what we've done

00:34:28.820 --> 00:34:33.230
with this technology is actually leverage technology

00:34:33.230 --> 00:34:35.409
that was actually developed in the 1960s by the

00:34:35.409 --> 00:34:38.909
US Navy, where they were really interested in

00:34:38.909 --> 00:34:41.309
media that you could breathe instead of air for

00:34:41.309 --> 00:34:44.670
deep sea submarine. So the concept of liquid

00:34:44.670 --> 00:34:48.409
breathing has been long known in literature,

00:34:48.429 --> 00:34:53.590
but has been very limited in practice because,

00:34:53.670 --> 00:34:58.409
well, as mammals, land mammals, we don't want

00:34:58.409 --> 00:35:01.489
to drown in fluid in order to breathe. And so

00:35:01.489 --> 00:35:04.710
this idea of replacing air with fluid one to

00:35:04.710 --> 00:35:07.550
one was the governing paradigm for the use of

00:35:07.550 --> 00:35:11.610
these materials. Our insight and where we turn

00:35:11.610 --> 00:35:14.809
this around was to say, well, what if we didn't

00:35:14.809 --> 00:35:17.210
actually replace the air with the fluid? But

00:35:17.210 --> 00:35:20.250
what if we use the fluid and encapsulate it in

00:35:20.250 --> 00:35:22.929
such a way where we can use it as a gas shuttle?

00:35:23.659 --> 00:35:27.079
And that's what we've done with Swaza. So this

00:35:27.079 --> 00:35:29.420
may be a silly question, but do we still need

00:35:29.420 --> 00:35:33.159
to inspire and expire? Do we still need the diaphragm

00:35:33.159 --> 00:35:35.619
moving up and down for this technology to work?

00:35:36.440 --> 00:35:39.639
Yes. And so it's working with how we breathe

00:35:39.639 --> 00:35:42.920
with our negative pressure diaphragmatic breathing.

00:35:43.440 --> 00:35:46.699
So the idea is when someone is under a certain

00:35:46.699 --> 00:35:51.050
amount of respiratory distress, if we can Use

00:35:51.050 --> 00:35:53.170
the diaphragmatic breathing, which actually provides

00:35:53.170 --> 00:35:57.710
the mechanical force necessary to power the particle,

00:35:57.789 --> 00:36:01.730
so to speak, to stir them in the alveoli. Then

00:36:01.730 --> 00:36:05.809
we can enable the diffusion of gas through those

00:36:05.809 --> 00:36:09.750
liquid and fibrotic barriers, and then sustain

00:36:09.750 --> 00:36:14.449
the person on their own breathing. while their

00:36:14.449 --> 00:36:16.869
clinicians are addressing the underlying cause

00:36:16.869 --> 00:36:19.909
of the inflammation or the sepsis or whatever

00:36:19.909 --> 00:36:24.050
is actually causing the injury. So this is addressing

00:36:24.050 --> 00:36:27.409
the gas exchange part. And it has to do with

00:36:27.409 --> 00:36:31.030
actually the material's very strong affinity

00:36:31.030 --> 00:36:34.590
for carbon dioxide is actually the driver for

00:36:34.590 --> 00:36:38.070
it. But under the atmospheric and physiological

00:36:38.070 --> 00:36:41.210
conditions that you would find in a human lung,

00:36:41.559 --> 00:36:44.940
what you would be doing is actually delivering

00:36:44.940 --> 00:36:48.480
oxygen and absorbing carbon dioxide and exhaling

00:36:48.480 --> 00:36:51.119
it. Where this technology is actually very exciting

00:36:51.119 --> 00:36:54.659
for us as well is that because it sequesters

00:36:54.659 --> 00:36:57.420
carbon dioxide in a situation where you have

00:36:57.420 --> 00:37:01.400
a hypercapnia or something like a COPD exacerbation,

00:37:01.440 --> 00:37:03.760
and this is when we're thinking blue sky, which

00:37:03.760 --> 00:37:07.230
is that could be very, very useful. in dealing

00:37:07.230 --> 00:37:09.630
with those specific conditions and helping provide

00:37:09.630 --> 00:37:12.250
relief for those patients. But it was designed

00:37:12.250 --> 00:37:15.250
to be a breathing aid that could be used in austere

00:37:15.250 --> 00:37:18.010
environments. It's nebulized with simple jet

00:37:18.010 --> 00:37:20.150
nebulizers. Or basically, we actually have a

00:37:20.150 --> 00:37:22.949
device that's simple compressed air device, solar

00:37:22.949 --> 00:37:26.510
powered, battery powered, that if you were out

00:37:26.510 --> 00:37:31.349
in an area where you didn't have much infrastructure

00:37:31.349 --> 00:37:34.989
clinically, you could still apply this material.

00:37:36.380 --> 00:37:40.280
Now, I think the obvious use case is healthcare,

00:37:40.400 --> 00:37:42.679
but it seems like you've come across other use

00:37:42.679 --> 00:37:48.340
cases like defense and maybe travel or deep sea

00:37:48.340 --> 00:37:51.659
diving or altitude sickness. How do you think

00:37:51.659 --> 00:37:55.460
about go to market for a solution such as this,

00:37:55.500 --> 00:37:58.579
which could have potentially different use cases?

00:38:00.030 --> 00:38:02.730
Yeah, I think those are what we're exploring

00:38:02.730 --> 00:38:07.369
now. And actually, our work with NATO and the

00:38:07.369 --> 00:38:09.570
US Department of Defense is very synergistic

00:38:09.570 --> 00:38:13.250
in that, in being able to explore, for example,

00:38:14.070 --> 00:38:24.090
uses for high altitude or dive injury, but then

00:38:24.090 --> 00:38:28.909
also more broadly in the recovery of human performance

00:38:28.909 --> 00:38:32.570
to be able to repair lung tissue, for example,

00:38:32.750 --> 00:38:37.210
after extreme exertions, or to be able to sustain,

00:38:37.210 --> 00:38:41.730
for example, VO2 max under extreme conditions.

00:38:42.170 --> 00:38:44.329
But just for the average person, for example,

00:38:44.539 --> 00:38:47.800
Many of us, I'm probably one of the people included,

00:38:48.059 --> 00:38:51.500
are at risk for being pretty hypoxemic on planes.

00:38:52.599 --> 00:38:55.619
Our blood oxygen just drops, for example. And

00:38:55.619 --> 00:38:57.360
for certain people with certain conditions, that

00:38:57.360 --> 00:39:03.139
can be very risky. For people over 65 who are

00:39:03.139 --> 00:39:05.980
very much at risk of ischemic heart disease,

00:39:06.239 --> 00:39:09.059
if you can imagine having this be portable with

00:39:09.059 --> 00:39:12.599
you in your undergoing an event to try to protect

00:39:12.880 --> 00:39:16.380
the heart tissue quickly while you get to the

00:39:16.380 --> 00:39:20.039
hospital or while you get to your clinician can

00:39:20.039 --> 00:39:22.360
mean the difference between that first heart

00:39:22.360 --> 00:39:28.739
attack and a second fatal one, for example. And

00:39:28.739 --> 00:39:32.699
so we, big picture, we envision this being something

00:39:32.699 --> 00:39:35.579
in the back of every ambulance and actually being

00:39:35.579 --> 00:39:38.480
carried by people who are at particular risk,

00:39:38.719 --> 00:39:42.599
sort of an EpiPen for oxygen, so to speak. That's

00:39:42.599 --> 00:39:45.659
sort of the big picture. And then if all the

00:39:45.659 --> 00:39:50.139
safety data, which we are confident actually

00:39:50.139 --> 00:39:53.719
can be supported by further study and validated,

00:39:55.019 --> 00:39:57.900
align, it's something that we would like to see

00:39:57.900 --> 00:40:02.000
broadly available to people for those uses. How

00:40:02.000 --> 00:40:07.300
do you think about intuition when building and

00:40:07.300 --> 00:40:12.489
selling in this industry? And maybe give us an

00:40:12.489 --> 00:40:15.889
example where you encountered something while

00:40:15.889 --> 00:40:20.130
building which challenged your intuition. And

00:40:20.130 --> 00:40:23.230
how did you kind of, so for me, I used to be

00:40:23.230 --> 00:40:29.369
a very intuitive person in terms of who to hire.

00:40:29.889 --> 00:40:32.829
And I've kind of been wrong so many times. So

00:40:32.829 --> 00:40:36.670
I think vibe hiring does not work, and you need

00:40:36.670 --> 00:40:40.329
a structured process. So I think it's hard to

00:40:40.329 --> 00:40:42.429
kind of know when to trust your intuition and

00:40:42.429 --> 00:40:48.050
when not to. Whereas maybe the easy or the lazy

00:40:48.050 --> 00:40:50.190
way is to always trust my intuition, because

00:40:50.190 --> 00:40:53.670
then I don't have to do the structured diligence

00:40:53.670 --> 00:40:57.230
on the back end of things. Yeah, so how do you

00:40:57.230 --> 00:41:01.679
think about intuition? And then like, yeah, just

00:41:01.679 --> 00:41:04.619
give me maybe an example where something happened

00:41:04.619 --> 00:41:07.360
and then you were like, oh, like intuitively

00:41:07.360 --> 00:41:13.739
this didn't make sense to me. Yeah. I mean, in

00:41:13.739 --> 00:41:16.840
a kind of scientific environment where there

00:41:16.840 --> 00:41:21.199
are a lot of unknowns, you often have to experiment

00:41:21.199 --> 00:41:25.260
your way forward. But I like what you said about

00:41:25.260 --> 00:41:27.340
intuition and just caused me to think, well,

00:41:27.340 --> 00:41:30.900
what do we really mean about intuition? And intuition

00:41:30.900 --> 00:41:34.500
is essentially a heuristic based on our informed

00:41:34.500 --> 00:41:41.679
choices and experiences. And so sometimes intuition

00:41:41.679 --> 00:41:45.539
can be a reflection of cognitive biases, which

00:41:45.539 --> 00:41:48.579
may not be helpful. And so I'll give you an example.

00:41:49.320 --> 00:41:53.019
I very early on in establishing the company as

00:41:53.019 --> 00:41:57.320
the investor, I did not have the plan of actually

00:41:57.320 --> 00:42:02.539
leading the company. What I did was I put in

00:42:02.539 --> 00:42:07.820
some initial capital, syndicated some investors

00:42:07.820 --> 00:42:12.400
from the Valley to come in early. And then I

00:42:12.400 --> 00:42:16.599
set about trying to hire the right CEO. And this

00:42:16.599 --> 00:42:20.280
was at the time, like late 2021, the public markets

00:42:20.280 --> 00:42:22.139
were already starting to tank a bit. And this

00:42:22.139 --> 00:42:25.460
was the very beginning of biotech winter. the

00:42:25.460 --> 00:42:27.780
early science had already been happening. So

00:42:27.780 --> 00:42:31.099
when I was calling sort of my Boston crew, Harvard

00:42:31.099 --> 00:42:34.199
Medical School crew, empty PhDs who had all the

00:42:34.199 --> 00:42:38.380
right kind of credentials done by a pharma startup

00:42:38.380 --> 00:42:40.800
before, they said, hey, Nikki, we really love

00:42:40.800 --> 00:42:42.599
this technology. We think it's great. We want

00:42:42.599 --> 00:42:45.280
to support you whenever we can. We do not want

00:42:45.280 --> 00:42:47.539
to have to raise money in this environment. So

00:42:47.539 --> 00:42:49.619
if you want us on board to do that, we'll help

00:42:49.619 --> 00:42:52.719
you. But we don't want to do that. And I said,

00:42:52.780 --> 00:42:57.199
well, that's the job. Right? And then so I thought,

00:42:57.280 --> 00:42:59.780
and at that point, what my intuition had told

00:42:59.780 --> 00:43:03.780
me was, well, look, Nikki, you need to get someone

00:43:03.780 --> 00:43:08.659
who fits a certain demographic profile, a certain

00:43:08.659 --> 00:43:13.340
pedigree, a certain look, a certain type, just

00:43:13.340 --> 00:43:15.380
fill in the blank of whatever cardboard cutout

00:43:15.380 --> 00:43:18.940
you think should be that founder to be able to

00:43:18.940 --> 00:43:22.559
raise money. And that's your job is to find that.

00:43:23.300 --> 00:43:26.539
And that, quote, intuition meant I wasn't that

00:43:26.539 --> 00:43:32.579
face. I wasn't that cardboard cut out. But somehow

00:43:32.579 --> 00:43:35.400
I thought that from behind a curtain, I was going

00:43:35.400 --> 00:43:39.260
to plan the roadmap, drive the roadmap, resource

00:43:39.260 --> 00:43:41.300
it with the right people, resource it with the

00:43:41.300 --> 00:43:45.449
right team. And yet somehow this other entity

00:43:45.449 --> 00:43:47.750
out there, this person who is supposed to be

00:43:47.750 --> 00:43:50.210
that right CEO was going to raise a bunch of

00:43:50.210 --> 00:43:53.269
money for the company. That turned out to be

00:43:53.269 --> 00:43:56.829
a massive mistake. Yeah. Yeah. Given your experience,

00:43:57.449 --> 00:43:59.610
like for me, you would be the cardboard cutter

00:43:59.610 --> 00:44:05.610
and the person to raise money for anything, including

00:44:05.610 --> 00:44:10.130
SSA. Well, my intuition was informed by certain

00:44:10.130 --> 00:44:13.599
quote facts, such as only 2 % to 3 % of venture

00:44:13.599 --> 00:44:18.440
capital goes to women founded companies, much

00:44:18.440 --> 00:44:23.699
less minority women founded companies. And then

00:44:23.699 --> 00:44:27.139
we're also, we were still in the wake or the

00:44:27.139 --> 00:44:30.320
shadow of an Elizabeth home. And I'm dealing

00:44:30.320 --> 00:44:32.880
with a technology that, as you said yourself,

00:44:32.940 --> 00:44:35.500
sounds like science fiction, right? It takes

00:44:35.500 --> 00:44:39.900
some explaining, but it's very scientifically

00:44:39.900 --> 00:44:44.760
sound. But when it's category changing. So all

00:44:44.760 --> 00:44:47.280
of those things, quote, had informed my intuition

00:44:47.280 --> 00:44:52.260
in 2021. But they were all wrong on a lot of

00:44:52.260 --> 00:44:54.940
different levels as well. I thought I was being

00:44:54.940 --> 00:45:00.030
prudent, but really, it was just reinforcing

00:45:00.030 --> 00:45:06.230
these biases. And the funny thing is, I did something

00:45:06.230 --> 00:45:09.469
that I would have never advised a mentee of mine

00:45:09.469 --> 00:45:13.090
to do, which would be to recede into the background,

00:45:13.730 --> 00:45:16.610
thinking that this other strategy would make

00:45:16.610 --> 00:45:23.690
the company win. And that wasn't correct. Do

00:45:23.690 --> 00:45:27.519
you think entrepreneurship is innate? Were you

00:45:27.519 --> 00:45:30.679
always an entrepreneur, say, when you were in

00:45:30.679 --> 00:45:34.159
middle school in your teenage years, or do you

00:45:34.159 --> 00:45:37.739
think it can be learned? I would say I was always

00:45:37.739 --> 00:45:44.380
creative, slightly iconoclastic and moved outside

00:45:44.380 --> 00:45:49.099
the strictures and the structures of what was

00:45:49.099 --> 00:45:51.599
around me to create things, but I would have

00:45:51.599 --> 00:45:56.300
never labeled myself as an entrepreneur. And

00:45:56.300 --> 00:45:59.519
I've asked that same question, Rashad, are there

00:45:59.519 --> 00:46:02.280
people born to be this? I think it's along a

00:46:02.280 --> 00:46:04.039
spectrum. There are some people that you know

00:46:04.039 --> 00:46:07.199
that they could never work for anybody else,

00:46:08.159 --> 00:46:10.739
that they have to strike out on their own. But

00:46:10.739 --> 00:46:15.039
I think our current environment actually demands

00:46:15.039 --> 00:46:22.380
us all to be entrepreneurs. We don't have the

00:46:22.380 --> 00:46:29.780
stability of institutions and. Cultural and even

00:46:29.780 --> 00:46:34.639
work norms that we had even 30 years ago. So

00:46:34.639 --> 00:46:39.619
everybody now has to think in terms of the the

00:46:39.619 --> 00:46:42.679
entrepreneur and i don't want to say that rightly

00:46:42.679 --> 00:46:45.679
but i think is humans we actually are highly

00:46:45.679 --> 00:46:50.059
adaptable. We solve problems we do that every

00:46:50.059 --> 00:46:55.219
day. I say, moms are the best entrepreneurs,

00:46:55.420 --> 00:46:57.739
right? Like if you want something done, ask a

00:46:57.739 --> 00:47:01.739
busy mom, for example, because they've got to

00:47:01.739 --> 00:47:04.440
manage building up human beings what could be

00:47:04.440 --> 00:47:07.719
more complicated or complex than that. So I think

00:47:07.719 --> 00:47:10.659
I see those skills and capabilities in people

00:47:10.659 --> 00:47:17.440
every day. And I think the environment that we

00:47:17.440 --> 00:47:19.940
live in now demand more of that. And I think

00:47:19.940 --> 00:47:23.119
it's a human thing to create. And it's a human

00:47:23.119 --> 00:47:26.780
thing to build. I think we are made to be creators.

00:47:28.260 --> 00:47:31.539
We've just formed that way. We're designed that

00:47:31.539 --> 00:47:37.619
way. And so in as much as entrepreneurism is

00:47:37.619 --> 00:47:40.940
an expression of that, I think we all are naturally

00:47:40.940 --> 00:47:42.960
entrepreneurs, whether we call ourselves that

00:47:42.960 --> 00:47:48.239
or not. What do you think is the path to changing

00:47:48.239 --> 00:47:51.059
the statistic that only 2 % to 3 % of venture

00:47:51.059 --> 00:47:56.039
capital flows to women? And even substantially,

00:47:56.239 --> 00:48:01.460
I'm assuming a small minority of that flows to

00:48:01.460 --> 00:48:07.500
minority women. I wish I had a really good answer

00:48:07.500 --> 00:48:15.360
to that question. I think It's just a matter

00:48:15.360 --> 00:48:22.659
of normalizing the effort. I tend to find that

00:48:22.659 --> 00:48:26.760
separating out women founders hasn't been as

00:48:26.760 --> 00:48:29.019
effective for women founders as we think it might

00:48:29.019 --> 00:48:31.880
be, like having women only funds, for example.

00:48:32.960 --> 00:48:35.460
They tend to be under a different kind of microscope.

00:48:35.739 --> 00:48:38.480
and actually tend to be more risk averse, right?

00:48:38.480 --> 00:48:40.940
Because they have to, you know, they have to

00:48:40.940 --> 00:48:43.119
win. They have to get returns. There's also always

00:48:43.119 --> 00:48:46.500
that stigma if you're in this. So I'm a minority

00:48:46.500 --> 00:48:49.719
in India. And then I was a minority when I moved

00:48:49.719 --> 00:48:54.460
to Canada when I was 16. I was one of four brown

00:48:54.460 --> 00:48:58.639
people in my high school. Although I used to

00:48:58.639 --> 00:49:00.340
think of myself a minority. I don't think I am

00:49:00.340 --> 00:49:03.480
anymore. If you look at the CEOs of a lot of

00:49:03.480 --> 00:49:10.860
public companies. I think intuitively I agree

00:49:10.860 --> 00:49:14.440
that if there is a class of humans that is oppressed,

00:49:14.739 --> 00:49:17.639
and I agree, women and women minorities are,

00:49:18.340 --> 00:49:21.440
they need to be uplifted so they're no longer

00:49:21.440 --> 00:49:23.980
oppressed. That makes sense to me. I don't know

00:49:23.980 --> 00:49:27.460
anyone who would argue against that. I don't

00:49:27.460 --> 00:49:28.920
personally know. I'm sure there are people who

00:49:28.920 --> 00:49:33.699
would argue against that. how to do it is more

00:49:33.699 --> 00:49:36.000
difficult and I can only speak from personal

00:49:36.000 --> 00:49:40.739
experience just seeing a lot more brown male

00:49:40.739 --> 00:49:44.219
CEOs. I don't feel oppressed anymore and I'm

00:49:44.219 --> 00:49:47.039
not a minority anymore, right? And there was

00:49:47.039 --> 00:49:50.800
no category that I know of for that specific

00:49:50.800 --> 00:49:56.380
race and gender for venture funding. I think

00:49:56.380 --> 00:49:58.219
you bring up a very interesting point is having

00:49:58.219 --> 00:50:04.300
these categories does it kind of make people

00:50:04.300 --> 00:50:06.679
who belong to those categories more insecure

00:50:06.679 --> 00:50:09.860
that I got this funding or I got this job because

00:50:09.860 --> 00:50:14.519
of my demographics, but not because of my aptitude?

00:50:15.659 --> 00:50:17.760
So we would love for you to kind of maybe dig

00:50:17.760 --> 00:50:21.539
a little bit deeper and like, does it mean that

00:50:21.539 --> 00:50:23.980
we just don't do it externally and internally,

00:50:24.219 --> 00:50:28.280
you know, we still uplift people? who need to

00:50:28.280 --> 00:50:34.599
be uplifted. Yeah. I think it's both. I think

00:50:34.599 --> 00:50:41.000
you want to reach down and support talent where

00:50:41.000 --> 00:50:44.739
you find it, and then also recognize where some

00:50:44.739 --> 00:50:49.139
of those barriers and challenges might be. I

00:50:49.139 --> 00:50:52.599
was challenged recently by very profound work

00:50:52.599 --> 00:50:57.480
by my colleague, Siri Chalaxi, who is a researcher

00:50:57.480 --> 00:50:59.980
at the Harvard Kennedy School. And she just came

00:50:59.980 --> 00:51:03.719
out with a book called Make Work Fair. And it's

00:51:03.719 --> 00:51:05.960
really fascinating work. They were particularly

00:51:05.960 --> 00:51:09.719
looking at gender discrepancies, for example,

00:51:10.480 --> 00:51:14.300
in corporate leadership and latter. And they

00:51:14.300 --> 00:51:17.900
found that these very kind of data -driven interventions

00:51:17.900 --> 00:51:23.920
really worked to level things out. And it wasn't

00:51:23.920 --> 00:51:27.300
really about categorizing people and separating

00:51:27.300 --> 00:51:29.699
them into specific programs, et cetera. But it

00:51:29.699 --> 00:51:32.719
was really just creating practices just even

00:51:32.719 --> 00:51:38.599
by the way that you screen resumes and write

00:51:38.599 --> 00:51:46.019
job descriptions to not privilege any particular

00:51:46.019 --> 00:51:49.079
group, but actually make it make it more fair.

00:51:49.980 --> 00:51:55.579
And these resulted in very good outcomes for

00:51:55.579 --> 00:51:57.500
everybody involved in the organizations that

00:51:57.500 --> 00:51:59.980
they studied. And so I think there is one thing,

00:52:00.199 --> 00:52:03.320
as we are all building companies and organizations,

00:52:03.960 --> 00:52:07.860
we should be mindful about the policies and structures

00:52:07.860 --> 00:52:13.500
and who we hire. I have a number of other female

00:52:13.500 --> 00:52:17.619
CEO colleagues in biotech who are also aware

00:52:17.619 --> 00:52:20.820
of these issues. But then we talk about, for

00:52:20.820 --> 00:52:24.139
example, hiring. And then they'll, for example,

00:52:25.440 --> 00:52:29.039
pick a candidate over a really great candidate,

00:52:29.099 --> 00:52:30.900
maybe a more qualified candidate who was like

00:52:30.900 --> 00:52:34.000
a mom. But she couldn't start right at that time

00:52:34.000 --> 00:52:36.760
they wanted her to because she needed to factor

00:52:36.760 --> 00:52:40.880
in the school start times. And I thought, guys,

00:52:41.760 --> 00:52:45.840
why are we Why are we doing this? Right? Like,

00:52:45.840 --> 00:52:51.000
it's our job to think about, are we perpetuating

00:52:51.000 --> 00:52:56.639
things that actually are then holding back really

00:52:56.639 --> 00:53:02.340
great talent? Because we have these ideas that

00:53:02.340 --> 00:53:06.199
somehow our organizations would be better benefited

00:53:06.199 --> 00:53:09.900
by by some what what what difference does it

00:53:09.900 --> 00:53:12.409
make if you change that higher by like, six,

00:53:12.429 --> 00:53:15.510
eight weeks. And you got this really great person.

00:53:16.250 --> 00:53:21.869
But you're discounting her off the bat because

00:53:21.869 --> 00:53:28.530
you didn't want to take into account this one

00:53:28.530 --> 00:53:30.809
consideration. So we have to be very mindful

00:53:30.809 --> 00:53:34.469
of that. And human beings, they have babies.

00:53:35.670 --> 00:53:38.570
For example, just think on a very basic level.

00:53:40.480 --> 00:53:44.119
In most cultures around the world, the majority

00:53:44.119 --> 00:53:48.019
of that work or thinking around that falls to

00:53:48.019 --> 00:53:52.860
moms. Well, as companies, as leaders, have we

00:53:52.860 --> 00:53:55.659
factored that in? Are we ruling out talent by

00:53:55.659 --> 00:53:58.679
not being able to be flexible to ramp these really

00:53:58.679 --> 00:54:00.579
talented people? It's not even about their gender.

00:54:01.119 --> 00:54:05.840
They're talented. ramp them back into the workforce

00:54:05.840 --> 00:54:08.719
properly so that we can benefit from that talent

00:54:08.719 --> 00:54:11.099
and we create value out of that. This is not

00:54:11.099 --> 00:54:14.679
charity. This is good business. So I've thought

00:54:14.679 --> 00:54:18.139
about these questions for a while. And I think

00:54:18.139 --> 00:54:21.300
it's in building organizations too. When you're

00:54:21.300 --> 00:54:23.239
in charge of the policy and you're in charge

00:54:23.239 --> 00:54:28.099
of the hiring, not vibe hiring because we vibe

00:54:28.099 --> 00:54:31.579
with people who are like us. And when I think

00:54:31.579 --> 00:54:36.800
about our company how very different the people

00:54:36.800 --> 00:54:39.960
that were brought together are we share very

00:54:39.960 --> 00:54:43.719
similar values underneath but as people we are

00:54:43.719 --> 00:54:46.960
radically different and if it was on vibes it

00:54:46.960 --> 00:54:51.739
would not have happened and um but if it was

00:54:51.739 --> 00:54:54.880
on purpose if it's on creation of value like

00:54:54.880 --> 00:54:57.260
if we but these are the exact people that we

00:54:57.260 --> 00:55:00.780
need On board to create this thing and build

00:55:00.780 --> 00:55:03.840
it forward but it's definitely not on vibes and

00:55:03.840 --> 00:55:05.900
it's definitely not on similarities and we tend

00:55:05.900 --> 00:55:10.400
to over rotate towards. Would i be like buddies

00:55:10.400 --> 00:55:13.719
with that this person the thing is you grow into

00:55:13.719 --> 00:55:17.360
that relationship. We're built for connection

00:55:17.360 --> 00:55:19.980
and you tend to find people that you spend more

00:55:19.980 --> 00:55:23.519
time with somehow you would have never been friends

00:55:23.519 --> 00:55:26.179
with them maybe just walking across the street

00:55:26.179 --> 00:55:30.159
and meeting them but. But in a shared mission

00:55:30.159 --> 00:55:33.340
together, you're a brand of brothers. You're

00:55:33.340 --> 00:55:35.519
a band of brothers and sisters. And because you

00:55:35.519 --> 00:55:38.980
have the shared purpose. So yeah, I think being

00:55:38.980 --> 00:55:42.239
aware of our tendency towards vibe anything,

00:55:42.340 --> 00:55:45.860
right? And then stepping back and saying, hey,

00:55:45.980 --> 00:55:48.480
what if I thought about this in a more holistic

00:55:48.480 --> 00:55:53.440
way or in a bigger picture way to reflect my

00:55:53.440 --> 00:55:57.869
values in what I think is important? um, societally

00:55:57.869 --> 00:56:00.929
within my, the confines of my own company is,

00:56:00.929 --> 00:56:05.530
is a, was a place to start. I think this is a

00:56:05.530 --> 00:56:08.449
great place to end. Thanks so much for joining

00:56:08.449 --> 00:56:11.449
us today, Nikki. Rashad, it's been a real pleasure.

00:56:11.550 --> 00:56:12.469
Thanks for having me.