July 25, 2025
Purpose-Driven Innovation: Niki Santo's Biotech Journey (Swaza)
In this insightful episode, Rishad Usmani sits down with Niki Santo, co-founder and CEO of Swaza, a Silicon Valley biotechnology startup. Niki shares her compelling personal journey, marked by profound loss and a head injury in 2020, which led her to redefine her life's purpose and pivot into biotech entrepreneurship.
Niki Santo: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nikivsanto/ Swaza: https://www.swaza.life/ Rishad Usmani: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishadusmani/ HealthTech Investors: https://www.healthtechinvestors.com/ LearningwithRishad: https://www.learningwithrishad.com/
WEBVTT
00:00:02.399 --> 00:00:05.580
Thanks for joining me today, Nikki. Hey, Rashad,
00:00:05.620 --> 00:00:10.060
great to be here. As we said today, you are leading
00:00:10.060 --> 00:00:14.199
a biotechnology startup at the forefront of medicine.
00:00:14.839 --> 00:00:19.850
How did you get here? Well, it's an interesting
00:00:19.850 --> 00:00:23.010
story. I actually am the co -founder and CEO
00:00:23.010 --> 00:00:25.649
of Swaza, which is based in Mountain View, California,
00:00:26.170 --> 00:00:28.690
Silicon Valley biotechnology startup. But how
00:00:28.690 --> 00:00:31.129
I came to it actually was as the first outside
00:00:31.129 --> 00:00:37.219
investor to the company. And the story really
00:00:37.219 --> 00:00:40.359
starts in COVID, as many of the stories today
00:00:40.359 --> 00:00:44.039
start. But in my case, in 2020 is the year that
00:00:44.039 --> 00:00:47.500
I call my Jobin year, because in that year, I
00:00:47.500 --> 00:00:51.659
lost my mom very early to COVID. To tell you
00:00:51.659 --> 00:00:54.240
how early it was when she passed in Virginia,
00:00:54.880 --> 00:00:58.159
they wrote about it in the Washington Post with
00:00:58.159 --> 00:01:01.679
two other people, because it was so exotic to
00:01:01.679 --> 00:01:05.150
actually have someone die from SARS -CoV -2.
00:01:05.569 --> 00:01:10.209
In that same year, I lost all of my dependents
00:01:10.209 --> 00:01:13.129
who lived with me. They were older dependents.
00:01:13.870 --> 00:01:18.090
And I suffered a head injury where I had to relearn
00:01:18.090 --> 00:01:21.349
how to walk again. I had so many different life
00:01:21.349 --> 00:01:23.969
changes in that one short period of time. I found
00:01:23.969 --> 00:01:28.950
myself at the end of 2020. alone with the mirror
00:01:28.950 --> 00:01:31.950
and God and asking the question, you know, when
00:01:31.950 --> 00:01:35.150
we lose those aspects of our identity that we
00:01:35.150 --> 00:01:38.950
define our daily lives by, then who are we really?
00:01:39.290 --> 00:01:42.450
And at the end of that time, I sort of just realized
00:01:42.450 --> 00:01:45.109
that, well, whatever I have or I haven't done
00:01:45.109 --> 00:01:46.969
or whatever I've achieved, I haven't achieved.
00:01:47.269 --> 00:01:51.250
I'm a steward. We don't really own anything.
00:01:51.829 --> 00:01:54.489
It's all on loan to us, time, money, resources,
00:01:55.189 --> 00:01:58.670
and talent. So I thought, well, what I need to
00:01:58.670 --> 00:02:01.069
do is basically spend whatever time I do have,
00:02:01.189 --> 00:02:03.950
whether it's 10 years or 100 years, it's all
00:02:03.950 --> 00:02:07.489
really short, building things that matter. And
00:02:07.489 --> 00:02:11.770
so I radically changed what my Focus was on,
00:02:11.770 --> 00:02:13.810
I radically changed the things I was investing
00:02:13.810 --> 00:02:17.490
in. I had a very different risk profile and risk
00:02:17.490 --> 00:02:21.550
appetite. And it wasn't really for money, but
00:02:21.550 --> 00:02:25.189
it was for impact. And so in parallel, at that
00:02:25.189 --> 00:02:28.449
same time, my co -founder Jay Rajadas had been
00:02:28.449 --> 00:02:32.889
rapidly trying to race against the clock to develop
00:02:32.889 --> 00:02:38.069
key technologies in response to COVID. a vaccine,
00:02:38.509 --> 00:02:41.050
a therapeutic, a number of other technologies.
00:02:41.250 --> 00:02:43.990
But the fourth technology he developed was this
00:02:43.990 --> 00:02:47.889
nanofluid breathing aid technology. And so when
00:02:47.889 --> 00:02:51.990
we met and converged, it really was about time
00:02:51.990 --> 00:02:58.289
and purpose. And I saw the utility of what we
00:02:58.289 --> 00:03:01.530
were doing in not only in respiratory care, but
00:03:01.530 --> 00:03:04.349
really the approach using these advanced drug
00:03:04.349 --> 00:03:07.530
delivery techniques to really create new kinds
00:03:07.530 --> 00:03:11.349
of therapeutics that really addressed the host
00:03:11.349 --> 00:03:15.090
or the person rather than specific underlying
00:03:15.090 --> 00:03:20.009
biochemical processes of disease as being not
00:03:20.009 --> 00:03:22.969
only very useful, but having huge utility and
00:03:22.969 --> 00:03:27.310
in meeting a huge unmet need. So my journey to
00:03:27.639 --> 00:03:31.240
this type of entrepreneurism rather than having
00:03:31.240 --> 00:03:35.099
it be a progression or departure from something
00:03:35.099 --> 00:03:38.159
that I had been doing before was more of a homecoming
00:03:38.159 --> 00:03:46.860
to a really intentional grounded and purposeful
00:03:46.860 --> 00:03:51.939
approach to not only investing my time but resources
00:03:51.939 --> 00:03:56.259
and an effort into. So when I came upon Swaza
00:03:56.259 --> 00:03:59.560
technology, it wasn't the question, should I
00:03:59.560 --> 00:04:03.259
do this? It was the question, how can I not do
00:04:03.259 --> 00:04:06.379
this? Because this matters. This is what I need
00:04:06.379 --> 00:04:09.479
to be called to build. And so that alignment
00:04:09.479 --> 00:04:13.699
of purpose, that alignment of mission was really
00:04:13.699 --> 00:04:16.699
what drove what drove all of this. Jay, who's
00:04:16.699 --> 00:04:18.819
the inventor of the technology, he spent his
00:04:18.819 --> 00:04:22.180
entire life creating life -giving therapeutics.
00:04:22.199 --> 00:04:25.459
And it's not for money or for fame. It's because
00:04:25.459 --> 00:04:30.240
he wants to see people benefit from good science
00:04:30.240 --> 00:04:34.649
and have better quality of life. So it's a real
00:04:34.649 --> 00:04:38.029
privilege to be able to do this and to represent
00:04:38.029 --> 00:04:41.949
a team of people who have decades of experience
00:04:41.949 --> 00:04:45.209
and passion creating therapeutics and regenerative
00:04:45.209 --> 00:04:51.589
biomaterials. I'm sorry to hear about your mom
00:04:51.589 --> 00:04:57.290
and your family. It sounds like you went through
00:04:57.290 --> 00:05:01.949
a very difficult time. to almost reprogram and
00:05:01.949 --> 00:05:05.889
rewire your thinking and your purpose to a different
00:05:05.889 --> 00:05:10.089
mission. If you're open, maybe talk to me about
00:05:10.089 --> 00:05:15.470
how did you think about purpose in life and how
00:05:15.470 --> 00:05:19.089
did that translate to different career opportunities
00:05:19.089 --> 00:05:26.149
you undertook before? It seems like you did amazing.
00:05:26.389 --> 00:05:30.810
work even before the COVID pandemic, and you
00:05:30.810 --> 00:05:34.430
continue to do amazing work after. To me, it
00:05:34.430 --> 00:05:37.329
looks almost like a linear trajectory, if I'm
00:05:37.329 --> 00:05:40.810
being frank with you, although I'll be in different
00:05:40.810 --> 00:05:44.850
industries and different radicals. How do you
00:05:44.850 --> 00:05:47.310
think about purpose now? And what advice do you
00:05:47.310 --> 00:05:50.730
have to say a 20 -year -old Nikki, if you had
00:05:50.730 --> 00:05:53.610
a chance to talk to her, what would you tell
00:05:53.610 --> 00:05:58.100
her about? purpose and maybe let's, you know,
00:05:58.199 --> 00:06:00.139
feel free to go into the personal side of things
00:06:00.139 --> 00:06:03.519
as well, but if you can give a synopsis on the
00:06:03.519 --> 00:06:07.370
career or the work side of things as well. Well,
00:06:07.629 --> 00:06:10.870
thanks, Rashad. I had been blessed with a very
00:06:10.870 --> 00:06:13.470
good career. I was good at what I did before.
00:06:13.470 --> 00:06:16.170
I was an executive leadership, particularly at
00:06:16.170 --> 00:06:19.269
the intersection of academia and entrepreneurship.
00:06:19.509 --> 00:06:23.670
We were building businesses spinning out of academia
00:06:23.670 --> 00:06:29.149
to actually scale up higher education. This was
00:06:29.149 --> 00:06:31.509
with the growth of online learning, with the
00:06:31.509 --> 00:06:37.050
growth of digital. textbooks, and the growth
00:06:37.050 --> 00:06:40.029
of competency -based education. So we were really
00:06:40.029 --> 00:06:42.389
one of the pioneers that ended up building an
00:06:42.389 --> 00:06:44.769
organization that was sold to University of Massachusetts
00:06:44.769 --> 00:06:49.470
in 2021. And so the educational mission, again,
00:06:49.910 --> 00:06:53.430
it ties back to a sense of purpose, a contribution
00:06:53.430 --> 00:06:59.310
to the world leadership. At the same time, I
00:06:59.310 --> 00:07:04.209
think, in the course of that career, which was
00:07:04.209 --> 00:07:06.750
very meaningful. I think we all reach these certain
00:07:06.750 --> 00:07:10.269
plateaus where you know that you're very good
00:07:10.269 --> 00:07:14.769
at it, but you're not learning more, and that
00:07:14.769 --> 00:07:18.350
the thing more that you should be doing may be
00:07:18.350 --> 00:07:22.089
outside of your comfort zone. And so I had reached
00:07:22.089 --> 00:07:25.509
that point at several different stages in my
00:07:25.509 --> 00:07:29.230
career. And I would always respond to that by
00:07:29.639 --> 00:07:33.199
stepping back and then seeing, given where I
00:07:33.199 --> 00:07:37.860
am right now, what can I do to explore these
00:07:37.860 --> 00:07:42.639
other aspects or talents that I want to cultivate?
00:07:43.579 --> 00:07:46.800
And who are the people that I should be doing
00:07:46.800 --> 00:07:49.620
that with? And that actually led me to a lot
00:07:49.620 --> 00:07:52.660
of my angel investing too. So prior to coming
00:07:52.660 --> 00:07:55.839
on board with Swaza, I had been doing a number
00:07:55.839 --> 00:08:02.060
of investments. investor with a little I, but
00:08:02.060 --> 00:08:05.300
you know, I had had the fortune of being just
00:08:05.300 --> 00:08:08.160
being in the Silicon Valley, right, persisting,
00:08:08.480 --> 00:08:10.519
getting getting some wins in that that area,
00:08:10.600 --> 00:08:13.319
which then, you know, rolled into my entrepreneurial
00:08:13.319 --> 00:08:17.139
journey at swaza. But to tell the 20 year old
00:08:17.139 --> 00:08:21.860
self, I actually have one of the really profound
00:08:21.860 --> 00:08:24.199
joys that I have is when I talk to young people.
00:08:24.519 --> 00:08:26.399
A couple of years ago, I was invited to University
00:08:26.399 --> 00:08:28.819
of Chicago at the Booth School of Business to
00:08:28.819 --> 00:08:30.759
meet with students there and talk to them about
00:08:30.759 --> 00:08:33.759
their journeys. And what I actually told those
00:08:33.759 --> 00:08:36.799
students, and this is something that I did after
00:08:36.799 --> 00:08:40.899
that profound year in 2020 at the end, was I
00:08:40.899 --> 00:08:45.879
sat and I made a list of everything that I wanted
00:08:45.879 --> 00:08:55.360
to do, be, and see like in terms of achievement
00:08:55.360 --> 00:08:58.940
and these are not necessarily a career achievements,
00:08:58.940 --> 00:09:02.759
but I didn't want to die before I knew this list
00:09:02.759 --> 00:09:07.299
of things that I had touched upon them and. It
00:09:07.299 --> 00:09:09.980
and it had to be a very honest list. It wasn't
00:09:09.980 --> 00:09:12.100
about what would look good to somebody on the
00:09:12.100 --> 00:09:16.159
outside. You know, the house car, everything
00:09:16.159 --> 00:09:18.679
that it wasn't from the outside in. It was from
00:09:18.679 --> 00:09:21.299
the inside out and having to sit and very be
00:09:21.299 --> 00:09:25.399
very honest with that list. And I sat at one
00:09:25.399 --> 00:09:28.320
point and I wrote and I kept writing and I kept
00:09:28.320 --> 00:09:33.720
writing just each line a different thing until
00:09:33.720 --> 00:09:37.139
I found myself starting to repeat things. That
00:09:37.139 --> 00:09:42.279
means I had exhausted that. And that became what
00:09:42.279 --> 00:09:47.360
I call the list, not very creative. But the interesting
00:09:47.360 --> 00:09:51.379
thing is when I committed to that sense of vision,
00:09:51.820 --> 00:09:56.799
that real true heart list, that's when everything
00:09:56.799 --> 00:09:59.620
really shifted for me that brought me to this
00:09:59.620 --> 00:10:03.549
part of my journey. Some of the things on the
00:10:03.549 --> 00:10:06.250
list were actually quite outlandish and ridiculous,
00:10:06.610 --> 00:10:08.509
like things I would have never imagined happening,
00:10:09.110 --> 00:10:14.149
but they felt truly aspirational to me. And the
00:10:14.149 --> 00:10:16.190
interesting thing is that over the course of
00:10:16.190 --> 00:10:18.750
time, I started noticing even those outlandish
00:10:18.750 --> 00:10:21.850
things on the list actually start to happen,
00:10:21.889 --> 00:10:24.889
because there was a fundamental truth, I think,
00:10:25.309 --> 00:10:29.659
from the inside out and then connecting. With
00:10:29.659 --> 00:10:31.919
the world that you live in and the life that
00:10:31.919 --> 00:10:34.639
that you you live in it there's there's an alignment
00:10:34.639 --> 00:10:38.320
there so i tell young people. Spend time making
00:10:38.320 --> 00:10:42.679
that list and be 100 % honest with yourself and
00:10:42.679 --> 00:10:45.080
then if you think you want something stop and
00:10:45.080 --> 00:10:49.960
say why do i want that is is it because i'm supposed
00:10:49.960 --> 00:10:53.769
to want that. Because social media tells me to
00:10:53.769 --> 00:10:56.230
want it, or whatever, or my classmates in my
00:10:56.230 --> 00:10:57.830
grad school tell me that that's what I should
00:10:57.830 --> 00:11:02.970
aspire to, or do I really want it? And it can
00:11:02.970 --> 00:11:06.269
be simple things as well. So my list ranges from
00:11:06.269 --> 00:11:09.590
the outlandish, about building my company, et
00:11:09.590 --> 00:11:13.750
cetera, to just small daily rituals of like,
00:11:14.450 --> 00:11:16.830
well, I want to have nice flowers in my house
00:11:16.830 --> 00:11:20.230
every week. Like, down to that level of detail,
00:11:20.269 --> 00:11:22.990
it somehow is important to my soul. I put it
00:11:22.990 --> 00:11:26.710
on the list. So that's what I tell young people.
00:11:26.730 --> 00:11:28.909
And that's what I tell myself, because that was
00:11:28.909 --> 00:11:32.549
a transformative process for me. And I still,
00:11:33.269 --> 00:11:36.750
every day, every morning, I put that list in
00:11:36.750 --> 00:11:40.529
front of me. Because you need that on the entrepreneurial
00:11:40.529 --> 00:11:43.370
journey, as you probably know yourself, to remind
00:11:43.370 --> 00:11:47.009
you, what am I doing? Why? Where does this come
00:11:47.009 --> 00:11:49.980
from? and every morning I put in front of me.
00:11:50.159 --> 00:11:55.019
And that's what orients my thinking that day.
00:11:57.200 --> 00:12:00.799
That's fascinating. And I'm someone who struggles
00:12:00.799 --> 00:12:04.320
with routine a lot. Every day is different, and
00:12:04.320 --> 00:12:08.330
I kind of like it that way. Which isn't ideal
00:12:08.330 --> 00:12:12.269
because often I get into Friday and I have 30
00:12:12.269 --> 00:12:17.289
things to do and I'm up till midnight. How do
00:12:17.289 --> 00:12:21.970
you think about routine and having say weekly
00:12:21.970 --> 00:12:25.750
or monthly goals or even daily goals as opposed
00:12:25.750 --> 00:12:29.970
to more going with the flow to an extent and
00:12:29.970 --> 00:12:32.370
just kind of seeing where the opportunities and
00:12:32.370 --> 00:12:35.480
problems lie in both here. personal and business
00:12:35.480 --> 00:12:39.600
life and dealing with those as they come? Yeah,
00:12:39.600 --> 00:12:41.220
that's a really good question because I think
00:12:41.220 --> 00:12:48.720
like you my natural tendency is to want to Not
00:12:48.720 --> 00:12:53.159
be limited by routine and then as an entrepreneur
00:12:53.159 --> 00:12:58.080
you can't really have professionally a routine
00:12:58.080 --> 00:13:01.120
as you would in a corporate environment where
00:13:01.820 --> 00:13:04.799
I know that these sort of set meetings are what
00:13:04.799 --> 00:13:08.039
I need to get to in order to, quote, do a good
00:13:08.039 --> 00:13:14.299
job. In a startup, which is not a company, it's
00:13:14.299 --> 00:13:16.519
a startup. It's building something that doesn't
00:13:16.519 --> 00:13:21.679
exist yet. You need to get to the milestone.
00:13:21.899 --> 00:13:25.159
You need to solve the problem. You need to address
00:13:25.159 --> 00:13:28.159
the the situation, whether it's equipment in
00:13:28.159 --> 00:13:31.519
your lab or if it's closing an investment. And
00:13:31.519 --> 00:13:33.659
those things can be very stochastic and they
00:13:33.659 --> 00:13:37.899
are the enemy of routine. What I found probably
00:13:37.899 --> 00:13:40.740
be more helpful rather than the routine itself
00:13:40.740 --> 00:13:47.919
is to have a very stable mental model about how
00:13:47.919 --> 00:13:51.360
you manage your objectives and time or effort
00:13:51.360 --> 00:13:55.299
rather. And I think effort and energy That's
00:13:55.299 --> 00:13:59.559
now what I think about things more. And so I
00:13:59.559 --> 00:14:02.519
was not, for example, prioritizing my health
00:14:02.519 --> 00:14:04.639
very early in the startup. It was all living
00:14:04.639 --> 00:14:07.379
very cognitively trying to just focus on the
00:14:07.379 --> 00:14:11.820
work of and the thousand different things that
00:14:11.820 --> 00:14:16.700
you need to pay attention to. But I realized
00:14:16.700 --> 00:14:20.000
that having a proper routine for my sleep, my
00:14:20.000 --> 00:14:24.440
diet, my exercise, if I didn't have that, then
00:14:25.289 --> 00:14:29.970
I couldn't support this cognitive life that had
00:14:29.970 --> 00:14:31.870
to drive. I couldn't make the right decisions.
00:14:32.090 --> 00:14:35.870
I couldn't have the right level of energy to
00:14:35.870 --> 00:14:41.570
do what I need to do. So it was more aligning
00:14:41.570 --> 00:14:46.049
to the bigger goal and then having that be what
00:14:46.049 --> 00:14:50.240
drives the sense of routine. And then also having
00:14:50.240 --> 00:14:52.980
some flexibility and then having those habits.
00:14:53.059 --> 00:14:56.299
So I like to think about things more in terms
00:14:56.299 --> 00:15:02.940
of a weekly container. What are the priorities
00:15:02.940 --> 00:15:06.940
for the week according to the role that I'm playing?
00:15:09.200 --> 00:15:15.940
And I'm a student of 1990s management theory.
00:15:16.779 --> 00:15:23.200
So like the Franklin Covies of the world, in
00:15:23.200 --> 00:15:28.679
1995, Intel had adopted this kind of universal
00:15:28.679 --> 00:15:30.840
time management system, which was called the
00:15:30.840 --> 00:15:33.039
Franklin system. This was ultimately acquired
00:15:33.039 --> 00:15:36.000
by Stephen Covering and became Franklin Covey.
00:15:36.000 --> 00:15:40.460
But that kind of model of having understanding
00:15:40.460 --> 00:15:46.000
what the important things are versus what's urgent.
00:15:46.730 --> 00:15:50.889
Did you explain the system to us? Yeah. So this
00:15:50.889 --> 00:15:54.450
paradigm is kind of understanding the difference
00:15:54.450 --> 00:15:56.370
between important and urgent. There are things
00:15:56.370 --> 00:15:58.870
that are both important and urgent. Those have
00:15:58.870 --> 00:16:01.950
to be top of mind. There are things that are
00:16:01.950 --> 00:16:05.730
urgent just because they're emerging contingencies
00:16:05.730 --> 00:16:09.009
and exigencies, but they're not necessarily important.
00:16:09.370 --> 00:16:11.909
They're little fires. But then there are things
00:16:11.909 --> 00:16:16.759
that are Neither important nor nor urgent or
00:16:16.759 --> 00:16:19.679
not strategic but oftentimes these take up a
00:16:19.679 --> 00:16:23.580
lot of our our time meaningless meanings pro
00:16:23.580 --> 00:16:27.610
forma kinds of things random emails but. because
00:16:27.610 --> 00:16:30.769
their activity, they can feel productive. And
00:16:30.769 --> 00:16:34.649
so the paradigm that I found very useful was,
00:16:34.750 --> 00:16:36.669
I think, one developed by Stephen Covey himself
00:16:36.669 --> 00:16:39.850
was called the big rocks, where you focus on
00:16:39.850 --> 00:16:42.629
what the big rocks are in your week, like the
00:16:42.629 --> 00:16:44.370
big things that you know have to get done that
00:16:44.370 --> 00:16:46.649
are really important. And then everything else
00:16:46.649 --> 00:16:50.509
gets organized around them. And then sort of
00:16:50.509 --> 00:16:53.669
organizing things by the week tend to be the
00:16:53.669 --> 00:16:58.250
right time scale for me, because then the day,
00:16:58.769 --> 00:17:01.629
you can slot things into the day. But as long
00:17:01.629 --> 00:17:04.029
as you feel that you are in the right direction
00:17:04.029 --> 00:17:06.910
for the week, I tend to find that that's been
00:17:06.910 --> 00:17:11.170
my sweet spot in terms of routines and in organizations.
00:17:11.450 --> 00:17:13.910
It's still a work in proc, still a work in process
00:17:13.910 --> 00:17:17.569
and progress. You know, I have colleagues who
00:17:17.569 --> 00:17:21.609
are very routinized, and I kind of admire them
00:17:21.609 --> 00:17:28.640
from afar for consistency. But that's what I
00:17:28.640 --> 00:17:34.900
do for me. There's a common mantra in this world
00:17:34.900 --> 00:17:36.960
or in this ecosystem that says, you know, move
00:17:36.960 --> 00:17:40.039
fast, break things, have a strong bias to action.
00:17:41.110 --> 00:17:44.430
And from an experiential perspective, I feel
00:17:44.430 --> 00:17:48.369
like that can go wrong very often in health care,
00:17:48.549 --> 00:17:51.369
because often you don't get second chances if
00:17:51.369 --> 00:17:54.950
you move fast or break things. And I have a very
00:17:54.950 --> 00:17:56.829
strong bias to action, so I have to temper this
00:17:56.829 --> 00:18:01.150
bias. Sometimes I need to plan a bit more before
00:18:01.150 --> 00:18:05.480
I launch a new product or even simple things
00:18:05.480 --> 00:18:08.180
like editing this podcast. I need to spend some
00:18:08.180 --> 00:18:12.200
time editing it and listening to it, coming up
00:18:12.200 --> 00:18:16.279
with some promotional materials. How do you think
00:18:16.279 --> 00:18:19.960
about bias to action versus bias to planning?
00:18:20.740 --> 00:18:23.819
I like Adam Grant's philosophy of moderate procrastination
00:18:23.819 --> 00:18:27.519
here. I don't know if I like it because that
00:18:27.519 --> 00:18:30.619
resonates with me, but how do you think about
00:18:30.619 --> 00:18:35.940
kind of these two opposites of planning or just
00:18:35.940 --> 00:18:40.920
acting right away? I think probably my experience
00:18:40.920 --> 00:18:44.920
is that overall a bias towards action tends to
00:18:44.920 --> 00:18:49.480
move the ball down the field. But a bias towards
00:18:49.480 --> 00:18:53.160
action isn't an excuse for lack of very intentional
00:18:53.579 --> 00:18:56.240
thinking and planning because you can move the
00:18:56.240 --> 00:18:58.380
ball the wrong direction. You could score the
00:18:58.380 --> 00:19:02.519
wrong goal, but probably on average, it's better
00:19:02.519 --> 00:19:07.960
to move than to keep still. That's just been
00:19:07.960 --> 00:19:14.859
my experience. I think procrastination is probably
00:19:14.859 --> 00:19:18.420
inevitable with any kind of thinking work that
00:19:18.420 --> 00:19:22.750
requires deep, deep thinking. And anywhere you're
00:19:22.750 --> 00:19:26.190
dealing with an unknown, that is, in fact, what
00:19:26.190 --> 00:19:29.970
you're mulling over. Where there could be multiple
00:19:29.970 --> 00:19:34.910
possibilities for a problem or a solution, you
00:19:34.910 --> 00:19:38.809
can't just act your way towards a solution sometimes.
00:19:38.809 --> 00:19:42.269
You have to think through, iterate, create small
00:19:42.269 --> 00:19:47.230
experiments, sort of test a hypothesis, and move
00:19:47.230 --> 00:19:52.819
forward. But I think the world as it's structured
00:19:52.819 --> 00:19:57.960
now is made for people who take action. And we
00:19:57.960 --> 00:20:01.279
know this intuitively. Is it always the most
00:20:01.279 --> 00:20:06.200
clever, the most competent, the most qualified
00:20:06.200 --> 00:20:15.880
who win the prize or win the game? No, it's often
00:20:15.880 --> 00:20:18.880
people who reach out and take. Take it right
00:20:18.880 --> 00:20:25.480
and that said. You know we want we want people
00:20:25.480 --> 00:20:28.240
to be thoughtful I don't believe in breaking
00:20:28.240 --> 00:20:31.700
things and we're in and you and I are in the
00:20:31.700 --> 00:20:37.220
sort of the health. You know field right where
00:20:37.220 --> 00:20:39.480
it's not about breaking things about first doing
00:20:39.480 --> 00:20:43.539
no harm and so. That's a guiding principle for
00:20:43.539 --> 00:20:46.299
us. Whatever we build, we need to make sure we
00:20:46.299 --> 00:20:50.680
spend the time. And if it takes longer, that
00:20:50.680 --> 00:20:54.920
it's 100 % absolutely safe. And it's 100 % absolutely
00:20:54.920 --> 00:20:57.799
we are confident that it's not going to cause
00:20:57.799 --> 00:21:01.460
harm. Or if there are harms, we understand every
00:21:01.460 --> 00:21:05.380
aspect of that potential harm. I think even if
00:21:05.380 --> 00:21:10.039
you're not building a medical technology, that's
00:21:10.039 --> 00:21:15.059
a good stance to adopt. And I think more builders,
00:21:15.279 --> 00:21:19.140
more engineers should think of that first. Why
00:21:19.140 --> 00:21:21.700
am I doing this? And what is the broader impact
00:21:21.700 --> 00:21:25.539
of what I'm doing? And therefore, I should force
00:21:25.539 --> 00:21:28.119
myself to slow down where it matters so that
00:21:28.119 --> 00:21:31.880
I don't create unintended consequences for what
00:21:31.880 --> 00:21:36.539
I build. Yeah, unintended consequences and downstream
00:21:36.539 --> 00:21:39.220
effects of what you build are critical in healthcare.
00:21:39.960 --> 00:21:42.099
You said something in the previous answer that
00:21:42.099 --> 00:21:45.740
I really like is activity can feel like progress.
00:21:45.940 --> 00:21:50.559
I feel like founders, sometimes they seek external
00:21:50.559 --> 00:21:53.019
validation more than internal validation. And
00:21:53.019 --> 00:21:55.140
by internal, I mean, internal company validation,
00:21:55.759 --> 00:21:58.900
which is, you know, does this drive revenue growth?
00:22:00.269 --> 00:22:03.069
Is the internal team aligned on the strategies
00:22:03.069 --> 00:22:06.109
we're foreseeing and is everyone happy? Is the
00:22:06.109 --> 00:22:09.829
team happy? Are we getting along? Sometimes I'll
00:22:09.829 --> 00:22:11.529
meet founders and then I see they're jumping
00:22:11.529 --> 00:22:14.329
from pitch competition to pitch competition and
00:22:14.329 --> 00:22:18.069
stage to stage and I go, oh no, these guys or
00:22:18.069 --> 00:22:21.970
these girls, they're going for the external validation
00:22:21.970 --> 00:22:26.470
of speaking on stage and winning. You know, usually
00:22:26.470 --> 00:22:29.130
these pitch competitions are $1 ,000 to $5 ,000
00:22:29.130 --> 00:22:33.569
as opposed to, and their team is staying back
00:22:33.569 --> 00:22:36.089
and working. And you can kind of see the path
00:22:36.089 --> 00:22:39.589
there. And usually it does not work out. Maybe
00:22:39.589 --> 00:22:43.049
let's give you a scenario. Let's say you got
00:22:43.049 --> 00:22:46.750
invited to JP Morgan Mainstage keynote speaker
00:22:46.750 --> 00:22:50.559
for Swaza. So something that maybe could. move
00:22:50.559 --> 00:22:52.819
the needle for revenue in some aspects, or at
00:22:52.819 --> 00:22:54.519
least from an investor perspective, although
00:22:54.519 --> 00:22:56.900
I would argue raising money is not the goal.
00:22:58.460 --> 00:23:01.660
It's a signal, but it doesn't really move the
00:23:01.660 --> 00:23:06.640
needle that much. There is some internal team
00:23:06.640 --> 00:23:11.460
dynamics at play that urgently happen that kind
00:23:11.460 --> 00:23:13.359
of need your attention to fix them. You know,
00:23:13.359 --> 00:23:16.240
your co -founders are fighting or something that
00:23:16.240 --> 00:23:18.960
I'm sure happens with every startup at some point.
00:23:19.720 --> 00:23:21.619
What do you pick and how do you kind of think
00:23:21.619 --> 00:23:24.880
about external validation and internal validation?
00:23:24.920 --> 00:23:27.039
And I'll kind of wrap this whole question up
00:23:27.039 --> 00:23:31.019
and with one more caveat, given that marketing
00:23:31.019 --> 00:23:35.460
matters and the world that we live in is designed
00:23:35.460 --> 00:23:38.539
where people make emotional decision and organizations
00:23:38.539 --> 00:23:41.400
make emotional decisions as well. And brand and
00:23:41.400 --> 00:23:47.680
marketing is important. I think your last caveat
00:23:47.680 --> 00:23:51.619
is so important and is so often under looked.
00:23:51.660 --> 00:23:55.279
And I'll get to that. But when you said JP Morgan
00:23:55.279 --> 00:23:58.799
main stage, sorry, the building can be on fire.
00:23:58.960 --> 00:24:02.579
I'll be on that main. that main stage. That's
00:24:02.579 --> 00:24:04.920
an opportunity you don't really pass up. But
00:24:04.920 --> 00:24:07.759
joking aside, that points to the bigger point,
00:24:07.819 --> 00:24:12.140
which is being selective about those stages.
00:24:12.359 --> 00:24:14.619
And you always have to tie it back to the mission
00:24:14.619 --> 00:24:16.099
of the company, what you're actually trying to
00:24:16.099 --> 00:24:22.900
achieve at that point. People and team, you're
00:24:22.900 --> 00:24:27.460
not going to achieve anything without them. making
00:24:27.460 --> 00:24:29.680
sure those things are taken care of. And we've
00:24:29.680 --> 00:24:36.680
had critical points where on the surface, all
00:24:36.680 --> 00:24:41.720
the external things were great. But I knew if
00:24:41.720 --> 00:24:47.420
we didn't address some internal dynamic, that
00:24:47.420 --> 00:24:53.339
surface success was going to disappear. quickly,
00:24:53.440 --> 00:24:57.960
or it would evaporate. And so sometimes doing
00:24:57.960 --> 00:25:01.420
the deep work of really realigning everybody,
00:25:02.980 --> 00:25:09.339
and myself included, actually, is important at
00:25:09.339 --> 00:25:12.640
key touch points. And then being able to also
00:25:12.640 --> 00:25:16.380
reflect back, because oftentimes, particularly
00:25:16.380 --> 00:25:19.880
in the startup world, we're running to the next
00:25:19.880 --> 00:25:23.079
thing. We're winning, but then there's you climb
00:25:23.079 --> 00:25:24.880
one mountain. You see the seven others. You've
00:25:24.880 --> 00:25:28.599
got to climb still and you don't stop. You have
00:25:28.599 --> 00:25:32.279
to stop and reflect back because you can't keep
00:25:32.279 --> 00:25:36.880
everybody with you, right? And with this, if
00:25:36.880 --> 00:25:40.420
you can't step back and and really in gratitude,
00:25:41.119 --> 00:25:44.319
see where you've come from that that that's really,
00:25:44.799 --> 00:25:48.440
really important. But your last point about.
00:25:48.680 --> 00:25:51.700
Well, the marketing and the story, I think there's
00:25:51.700 --> 00:25:56.359
obviously two extremes where when you say like,
00:25:56.420 --> 00:26:00.099
what gets measured gets done oftentimes in a
00:26:00.099 --> 00:26:05.339
very media rich environment and an information
00:26:05.339 --> 00:26:10.579
heavy environment. What you post and what seems
00:26:10.579 --> 00:26:14.839
external looks like what you're measuring. And
00:26:14.839 --> 00:26:18.539
then you create this self sustaining loop where
00:26:18.670 --> 00:26:21.730
the more you do that the more it seems like you're
00:26:21.730 --> 00:26:25.150
making progress and it it tells a good story
00:26:25.150 --> 00:26:30.349
but i i was recently in conversations with a
00:26:30.349 --> 00:26:34.089
very close friend who is the managing director
00:26:34.089 --> 00:26:37.869
of a big investment bank in new york that specializes
00:26:37.869 --> 00:26:41.630
in biotech and he offered me a cautionary tale
00:26:41.630 --> 00:26:46.390
which is from our perspective from the 45th floor
00:26:46.390 --> 00:26:49.049
of people who are going to be financing that
00:26:49.049 --> 00:26:53.369
last three rounds right before IPO or that acquisition.
00:26:54.049 --> 00:26:58.730
We see your activity as a distraction because
00:26:58.730 --> 00:27:01.750
for us we're running the core numbers on your
00:27:01.750 --> 00:27:05.890
primary program and is that particular asset
00:27:05.890 --> 00:27:09.490
going to make money and of sufficient multiples
00:27:09.490 --> 00:27:14.309
on our investment in order to justify the investment.
00:27:14.799 --> 00:27:19.940
And so it can look like and feel like you're
00:27:19.940 --> 00:27:22.759
doing a lot. But if you're ignoring your primary
00:27:22.759 --> 00:27:28.319
business and it's proper feeding and care, we
00:27:28.319 --> 00:27:30.839
are going to see that we can see it because we
00:27:30.839 --> 00:27:34.000
see it all the time. So he literally offered
00:27:34.000 --> 00:27:39.559
me a top down view as a cautionary reminder that
00:27:39.559 --> 00:27:43.140
the external validation and there are a lot of
00:27:44.019 --> 00:27:47.400
It's like founder culture or hustle culture is
00:27:47.400 --> 00:27:50.539
very external, right? I'm doing so much, and
00:27:50.539 --> 00:27:53.420
I'm in this city, and I'm that city. But in the
00:27:53.420 --> 00:27:56.359
end, you're running a business. And you're not
00:27:56.359 --> 00:27:58.759
just running one business. You're running multiple
00:27:58.759 --> 00:28:01.539
potential businesses backwards and forwards,
00:28:01.599 --> 00:28:03.680
because it could be a number of different things.
00:28:04.099 --> 00:28:07.319
And my job as the CEO is to understand every
00:28:07.319 --> 00:28:10.700
business this possibly could be. and then to
00:28:10.700 --> 00:28:13.779
build both forwards and backwards simultaneously
00:28:13.779 --> 00:28:19.420
to what those strategic options are. So as long
00:28:19.420 --> 00:28:21.859
as you can always come back to the center, am
00:28:21.859 --> 00:28:24.940
I moving the right ball down the right field
00:28:24.940 --> 00:28:28.160
at the right pace? Then that's the guidepost.
00:28:28.200 --> 00:28:30.599
But you do have to check back in with yourself
00:28:30.599 --> 00:28:33.839
because you can end up spending two quarters
00:28:33.839 --> 00:28:39.819
on the big world tour and get a lot of press.
00:28:40.940 --> 00:28:44.579
But if that press doesn't translate into moving
00:28:44.579 --> 00:28:47.720
the core, the core business down the field or
00:28:47.720 --> 00:28:49.759
the primary program or whatever it is that you're
00:28:49.759 --> 00:28:51.960
actually supposed to be doing at that time, it
00:28:51.960 --> 00:28:56.940
can actually just be a distraction. What is the
00:28:56.940 --> 00:29:01.859
path to exit for swaza? Yeah, so there are a
00:29:01.859 --> 00:29:06.019
couple of different strategic option so that
00:29:06.019 --> 00:29:09.779
it's all situational based on where we find ourselves
00:29:09.779 --> 00:29:12.900
at different inflection points. So our primary
00:29:12.900 --> 00:29:15.460
assets was a one, which is the nanofluid breathing
00:29:15.460 --> 00:29:20.299
aid. We're accelerating that into phase two clinical.
00:29:21.380 --> 00:29:24.940
Studies within the next eighteen months. And
00:29:24.940 --> 00:29:27.880
pending on early readout of those phase two studies
00:29:27.880 --> 00:29:31.960
there are a couple of options one is to already
00:29:31.960 --> 00:29:35.779
strategically partner with the big pharma to
00:29:35.779 --> 00:29:41.039
bring that asset to market to is to also or to
00:29:41.039 --> 00:29:46.670
seek. Then. funding from the public markets to
00:29:46.670 --> 00:29:49.269
then support later clinical trials, which is
00:29:49.269 --> 00:29:53.309
sort of a classic biotech playbook. But this
00:29:53.309 --> 00:29:59.990
was pre -COVID playbook. So you and your audience
00:29:59.990 --> 00:30:02.009
may have heard of Merck's recent acquisition
00:30:02.009 --> 00:30:07.529
of Verona Therapeutics and for their first in
00:30:07.529 --> 00:30:13.799
class COPD drug. And Verona was one of these
00:30:13.799 --> 00:30:16.559
companies that had very good early phase two
00:30:16.559 --> 00:30:20.299
readout. They went public on the NASDAQ in 2017,
00:30:21.079 --> 00:30:24.200
raised $80 million, did their full clinical trials,
00:30:24.220 --> 00:30:26.839
and actually got the drug already approved in
00:30:26.839 --> 00:30:30.599
2024 by the FDA. And it was after that point
00:30:30.599 --> 00:30:33.440
that Merck went in and then acquired them for
00:30:33.440 --> 00:30:38.000
$10 billion. So many multiples over what Merck
00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:40.700
might have had to pay if they had come in earlier.
00:30:41.180 --> 00:30:43.519
Big pharmas, the cost of capital for them is
00:30:43.519 --> 00:30:46.940
much smaller. They can afford to completely come
00:30:46.940 --> 00:30:50.240
into a de -risked asset and acquire it later.
00:30:50.500 --> 00:30:54.799
They have the cash to do that. But that's sort
00:30:54.799 --> 00:30:59.400
of a classic. strategic option for a company
00:30:59.400 --> 00:31:04.380
like Swaza. So it really depends on the gates
00:31:04.380 --> 00:31:07.319
where you cross. What we are hoping for is nice
00:31:07.319 --> 00:31:09.900
early phase two readout. What we would like to
00:31:09.900 --> 00:31:14.059
be able to do is leverage that into much larger
00:31:14.059 --> 00:31:17.339
capitalization to be able to then fuel not only
00:31:17.339 --> 00:31:19.940
that asset, but we have a number of other programs
00:31:19.940 --> 00:31:26.099
because we have technology for wound healing,
00:31:26.180 --> 00:31:29.019
for example, to suffuse wounds and burns with
00:31:29.019 --> 00:31:32.400
oxygen, replicating the benefits of hyperbaric
00:31:32.400 --> 00:31:35.700
oxygen therapy treatment without the hyperbaric
00:31:35.700 --> 00:31:37.940
oxygen chambers. You can imagine that this can
00:31:37.940 --> 00:31:40.799
be very useful for patients with diabetic ulcers,
00:31:41.160 --> 00:31:45.599
for which there actually aren't any topical specifically
00:31:45.599 --> 00:31:49.099
approved for that. Actually, you think of the
00:31:49.099 --> 00:31:54.609
current leading drugs for they actually indicate
00:31:54.609 --> 00:31:57.630
in the labeling that it's not really intended
00:31:57.630 --> 00:32:00.109
for use where there's poor vascularization, for
00:32:00.109 --> 00:32:02.470
example, which kind of defeats the point. That's
00:32:02.470 --> 00:32:05.849
an area of unmet need that we'd like to address.
00:32:06.490 --> 00:32:09.710
But we also have other advanced delivery technologies
00:32:09.710 --> 00:32:14.990
which are very promising that we want to advance.
00:32:15.069 --> 00:32:17.849
For example, being able to leverage the colon.
00:32:18.299 --> 00:32:21.519
for advanced drug delivery for a number of different
00:32:21.519 --> 00:32:26.039
indications to be able to bypass the liver. And
00:32:26.039 --> 00:32:29.400
then also, we have very advanced sublingual technologies,
00:32:29.539 --> 00:32:31.839
which we can load various peptides and molecules
00:32:31.839 --> 00:32:37.220
on. Again, minimally invasive, noninvasive, bypassing
00:32:37.220 --> 00:32:40.940
the GI tract and the liver. So inhalation route
00:32:40.940 --> 00:32:44.700
of drug delivery, also extremely promising for
00:32:44.700 --> 00:32:47.880
a number of things. So we have a number of really
00:32:47.880 --> 00:32:50.980
exciting projects that we are developing and
00:32:50.980 --> 00:32:53.740
pushing forward. And we want our first asset
00:32:53.740 --> 00:33:00.420
to be the Vanguard to be able to expand all of
00:33:00.420 --> 00:33:05.660
those technologies. For the physicians listening,
00:33:05.960 --> 00:33:09.380
I think we inherently recognize that ventilation
00:33:09.380 --> 00:33:14.180
is kind of the worst way to deliver oxygen. But
00:33:14.180 --> 00:33:18.519
we also then say, well, When we think of something
00:33:18.519 --> 00:33:24.160
like Swaza, you know, nanotherapeutics delivering
00:33:24.160 --> 00:33:27.119
oxygen to the alveoli, it sounds like science
00:33:27.119 --> 00:33:34.759
fiction. Talk to me about, yeah, just talk to
00:33:34.759 --> 00:33:38.480
me a bit more about the technology, about the
00:33:38.480 --> 00:33:41.339
delivery method, and then is the goal to then
00:33:41.339 --> 00:33:47.039
replace? ventilators and intubation and how do
00:33:47.039 --> 00:33:50.319
you kind of think about the initial clinical
00:33:50.319 --> 00:33:53.839
use case and then what's the blue ocean or blue
00:33:53.839 --> 00:33:57.819
sky scenario? Yeah, in essence what we've developed
00:33:57.819 --> 00:34:02.660
with SWASA is a topical breathing egg that comprises
00:34:02.660 --> 00:34:06.319
liquid nanoparticles that can enable dynamic
00:34:06.319 --> 00:34:09.519
gas exchange at the surface. of the lung. So
00:34:09.519 --> 00:34:12.400
we're actually addressing the physical barriers,
00:34:13.119 --> 00:34:15.480
the key universal features of lung injuries.
00:34:15.539 --> 00:34:19.139
So you have fluid buildup, protein buildup, and
00:34:19.139 --> 00:34:21.579
oftentimes scar tissue at the surface, which
00:34:21.579 --> 00:34:24.980
are a physical block from oxygen coming in and
00:34:24.980 --> 00:34:28.820
carbon dioxide leaving. And so what we've done
00:34:28.820 --> 00:34:33.230
with this technology is actually leverage technology
00:34:33.230 --> 00:34:35.409
that was actually developed in the 1960s by the
00:34:35.409 --> 00:34:38.909
US Navy, where they were really interested in
00:34:38.909 --> 00:34:41.309
media that you could breathe instead of air for
00:34:41.309 --> 00:34:44.670
deep sea submarine. So the concept of liquid
00:34:44.670 --> 00:34:48.409
breathing has been long known in literature,
00:34:48.429 --> 00:34:53.590
but has been very limited in practice because,
00:34:53.670 --> 00:34:58.409
well, as mammals, land mammals, we don't want
00:34:58.409 --> 00:35:01.489
to drown in fluid in order to breathe. And so
00:35:01.489 --> 00:35:04.710
this idea of replacing air with fluid one to
00:35:04.710 --> 00:35:07.550
one was the governing paradigm for the use of
00:35:07.550 --> 00:35:11.610
these materials. Our insight and where we turn
00:35:11.610 --> 00:35:14.809
this around was to say, well, what if we didn't
00:35:14.809 --> 00:35:17.210
actually replace the air with the fluid? But
00:35:17.210 --> 00:35:20.250
what if we use the fluid and encapsulate it in
00:35:20.250 --> 00:35:22.929
such a way where we can use it as a gas shuttle?
00:35:23.659 --> 00:35:27.079
And that's what we've done with Swaza. So this
00:35:27.079 --> 00:35:29.420
may be a silly question, but do we still need
00:35:29.420 --> 00:35:33.159
to inspire and expire? Do we still need the diaphragm
00:35:33.159 --> 00:35:35.619
moving up and down for this technology to work?
00:35:36.440 --> 00:35:39.639
Yes. And so it's working with how we breathe
00:35:39.639 --> 00:35:42.920
with our negative pressure diaphragmatic breathing.
00:35:43.440 --> 00:35:46.699
So the idea is when someone is under a certain
00:35:46.699 --> 00:35:51.050
amount of respiratory distress, if we can Use
00:35:51.050 --> 00:35:53.170
the diaphragmatic breathing, which actually provides
00:35:53.170 --> 00:35:57.710
the mechanical force necessary to power the particle,
00:35:57.789 --> 00:36:01.730
so to speak, to stir them in the alveoli. Then
00:36:01.730 --> 00:36:05.809
we can enable the diffusion of gas through those
00:36:05.809 --> 00:36:09.750
liquid and fibrotic barriers, and then sustain
00:36:09.750 --> 00:36:14.449
the person on their own breathing. while their
00:36:14.449 --> 00:36:16.869
clinicians are addressing the underlying cause
00:36:16.869 --> 00:36:19.909
of the inflammation or the sepsis or whatever
00:36:19.909 --> 00:36:24.050
is actually causing the injury. So this is addressing
00:36:24.050 --> 00:36:27.409
the gas exchange part. And it has to do with
00:36:27.409 --> 00:36:31.030
actually the material's very strong affinity
00:36:31.030 --> 00:36:34.590
for carbon dioxide is actually the driver for
00:36:34.590 --> 00:36:38.070
it. But under the atmospheric and physiological
00:36:38.070 --> 00:36:41.210
conditions that you would find in a human lung,
00:36:41.559 --> 00:36:44.940
what you would be doing is actually delivering
00:36:44.940 --> 00:36:48.480
oxygen and absorbing carbon dioxide and exhaling
00:36:48.480 --> 00:36:51.119
it. Where this technology is actually very exciting
00:36:51.119 --> 00:36:54.659
for us as well is that because it sequesters
00:36:54.659 --> 00:36:57.420
carbon dioxide in a situation where you have
00:36:57.420 --> 00:37:01.400
a hypercapnia or something like a COPD exacerbation,
00:37:01.440 --> 00:37:03.760
and this is when we're thinking blue sky, which
00:37:03.760 --> 00:37:07.230
is that could be very, very useful. in dealing
00:37:07.230 --> 00:37:09.630
with those specific conditions and helping provide
00:37:09.630 --> 00:37:12.250
relief for those patients. But it was designed
00:37:12.250 --> 00:37:15.250
to be a breathing aid that could be used in austere
00:37:15.250 --> 00:37:18.010
environments. It's nebulized with simple jet
00:37:18.010 --> 00:37:20.150
nebulizers. Or basically, we actually have a
00:37:20.150 --> 00:37:22.949
device that's simple compressed air device, solar
00:37:22.949 --> 00:37:26.510
powered, battery powered, that if you were out
00:37:26.510 --> 00:37:31.349
in an area where you didn't have much infrastructure
00:37:31.349 --> 00:37:34.989
clinically, you could still apply this material.
00:37:36.380 --> 00:37:40.280
Now, I think the obvious use case is healthcare,
00:37:40.400 --> 00:37:42.679
but it seems like you've come across other use
00:37:42.679 --> 00:37:48.340
cases like defense and maybe travel or deep sea
00:37:48.340 --> 00:37:51.659
diving or altitude sickness. How do you think
00:37:51.659 --> 00:37:55.460
about go to market for a solution such as this,
00:37:55.500 --> 00:37:58.579
which could have potentially different use cases?
00:38:00.030 --> 00:38:02.730
Yeah, I think those are what we're exploring
00:38:02.730 --> 00:38:07.369
now. And actually, our work with NATO and the
00:38:07.369 --> 00:38:09.570
US Department of Defense is very synergistic
00:38:09.570 --> 00:38:13.250
in that, in being able to explore, for example,
00:38:14.070 --> 00:38:24.090
uses for high altitude or dive injury, but then
00:38:24.090 --> 00:38:28.909
also more broadly in the recovery of human performance
00:38:28.909 --> 00:38:32.570
to be able to repair lung tissue, for example,
00:38:32.750 --> 00:38:37.210
after extreme exertions, or to be able to sustain,
00:38:37.210 --> 00:38:41.730
for example, VO2 max under extreme conditions.
00:38:42.170 --> 00:38:44.329
But just for the average person, for example,
00:38:44.539 --> 00:38:47.800
Many of us, I'm probably one of the people included,
00:38:48.059 --> 00:38:51.500
are at risk for being pretty hypoxemic on planes.
00:38:52.599 --> 00:38:55.619
Our blood oxygen just drops, for example. And
00:38:55.619 --> 00:38:57.360
for certain people with certain conditions, that
00:38:57.360 --> 00:39:03.139
can be very risky. For people over 65 who are
00:39:03.139 --> 00:39:05.980
very much at risk of ischemic heart disease,
00:39:06.239 --> 00:39:09.059
if you can imagine having this be portable with
00:39:09.059 --> 00:39:12.599
you in your undergoing an event to try to protect
00:39:12.880 --> 00:39:16.380
the heart tissue quickly while you get to the
00:39:16.380 --> 00:39:20.039
hospital or while you get to your clinician can
00:39:20.039 --> 00:39:22.360
mean the difference between that first heart
00:39:22.360 --> 00:39:28.739
attack and a second fatal one, for example. And
00:39:28.739 --> 00:39:32.699
so we, big picture, we envision this being something
00:39:32.699 --> 00:39:35.579
in the back of every ambulance and actually being
00:39:35.579 --> 00:39:38.480
carried by people who are at particular risk,
00:39:38.719 --> 00:39:42.599
sort of an EpiPen for oxygen, so to speak. That's
00:39:42.599 --> 00:39:45.659
sort of the big picture. And then if all the
00:39:45.659 --> 00:39:50.139
safety data, which we are confident actually
00:39:50.139 --> 00:39:53.719
can be supported by further study and validated,
00:39:55.019 --> 00:39:57.900
align, it's something that we would like to see
00:39:57.900 --> 00:40:02.000
broadly available to people for those uses. How
00:40:02.000 --> 00:40:07.300
do you think about intuition when building and
00:40:07.300 --> 00:40:12.489
selling in this industry? And maybe give us an
00:40:12.489 --> 00:40:15.889
example where you encountered something while
00:40:15.889 --> 00:40:20.130
building which challenged your intuition. And
00:40:20.130 --> 00:40:23.230
how did you kind of, so for me, I used to be
00:40:23.230 --> 00:40:29.369
a very intuitive person in terms of who to hire.
00:40:29.889 --> 00:40:32.829
And I've kind of been wrong so many times. So
00:40:32.829 --> 00:40:36.670
I think vibe hiring does not work, and you need
00:40:36.670 --> 00:40:40.329
a structured process. So I think it's hard to
00:40:40.329 --> 00:40:42.429
kind of know when to trust your intuition and
00:40:42.429 --> 00:40:48.050
when not to. Whereas maybe the easy or the lazy
00:40:48.050 --> 00:40:50.190
way is to always trust my intuition, because
00:40:50.190 --> 00:40:53.670
then I don't have to do the structured diligence
00:40:53.670 --> 00:40:57.230
on the back end of things. Yeah, so how do you
00:40:57.230 --> 00:41:01.679
think about intuition? And then like, yeah, just
00:41:01.679 --> 00:41:04.619
give me maybe an example where something happened
00:41:04.619 --> 00:41:07.360
and then you were like, oh, like intuitively
00:41:07.360 --> 00:41:13.739
this didn't make sense to me. Yeah. I mean, in
00:41:13.739 --> 00:41:16.840
a kind of scientific environment where there
00:41:16.840 --> 00:41:21.199
are a lot of unknowns, you often have to experiment
00:41:21.199 --> 00:41:25.260
your way forward. But I like what you said about
00:41:25.260 --> 00:41:27.340
intuition and just caused me to think, well,
00:41:27.340 --> 00:41:30.900
what do we really mean about intuition? And intuition
00:41:30.900 --> 00:41:34.500
is essentially a heuristic based on our informed
00:41:34.500 --> 00:41:41.679
choices and experiences. And so sometimes intuition
00:41:41.679 --> 00:41:45.539
can be a reflection of cognitive biases, which
00:41:45.539 --> 00:41:48.579
may not be helpful. And so I'll give you an example.
00:41:49.320 --> 00:41:53.019
I very early on in establishing the company as
00:41:53.019 --> 00:41:57.320
the investor, I did not have the plan of actually
00:41:57.320 --> 00:42:02.539
leading the company. What I did was I put in
00:42:02.539 --> 00:42:07.820
some initial capital, syndicated some investors
00:42:07.820 --> 00:42:12.400
from the Valley to come in early. And then I
00:42:12.400 --> 00:42:16.599
set about trying to hire the right CEO. And this
00:42:16.599 --> 00:42:20.280
was at the time, like late 2021, the public markets
00:42:20.280 --> 00:42:22.139
were already starting to tank a bit. And this
00:42:22.139 --> 00:42:25.460
was the very beginning of biotech winter. the
00:42:25.460 --> 00:42:27.780
early science had already been happening. So
00:42:27.780 --> 00:42:31.099
when I was calling sort of my Boston crew, Harvard
00:42:31.099 --> 00:42:34.199
Medical School crew, empty PhDs who had all the
00:42:34.199 --> 00:42:38.380
right kind of credentials done by a pharma startup
00:42:38.380 --> 00:42:40.800
before, they said, hey, Nikki, we really love
00:42:40.800 --> 00:42:42.599
this technology. We think it's great. We want
00:42:42.599 --> 00:42:45.280
to support you whenever we can. We do not want
00:42:45.280 --> 00:42:47.539
to have to raise money in this environment. So
00:42:47.539 --> 00:42:49.619
if you want us on board to do that, we'll help
00:42:49.619 --> 00:42:52.719
you. But we don't want to do that. And I said,
00:42:52.780 --> 00:42:57.199
well, that's the job. Right? And then so I thought,
00:42:57.280 --> 00:42:59.780
and at that point, what my intuition had told
00:42:59.780 --> 00:43:03.780
me was, well, look, Nikki, you need to get someone
00:43:03.780 --> 00:43:08.659
who fits a certain demographic profile, a certain
00:43:08.659 --> 00:43:13.340
pedigree, a certain look, a certain type, just
00:43:13.340 --> 00:43:15.380
fill in the blank of whatever cardboard cutout
00:43:15.380 --> 00:43:18.940
you think should be that founder to be able to
00:43:18.940 --> 00:43:22.559
raise money. And that's your job is to find that.
00:43:23.300 --> 00:43:26.539
And that, quote, intuition meant I wasn't that
00:43:26.539 --> 00:43:32.579
face. I wasn't that cardboard cut out. But somehow
00:43:32.579 --> 00:43:35.400
I thought that from behind a curtain, I was going
00:43:35.400 --> 00:43:39.260
to plan the roadmap, drive the roadmap, resource
00:43:39.260 --> 00:43:41.300
it with the right people, resource it with the
00:43:41.300 --> 00:43:45.449
right team. And yet somehow this other entity
00:43:45.449 --> 00:43:47.750
out there, this person who is supposed to be
00:43:47.750 --> 00:43:50.210
that right CEO was going to raise a bunch of
00:43:50.210 --> 00:43:53.269
money for the company. That turned out to be
00:43:53.269 --> 00:43:56.829
a massive mistake. Yeah. Yeah. Given your experience,
00:43:57.449 --> 00:43:59.610
like for me, you would be the cardboard cutter
00:43:59.610 --> 00:44:05.610
and the person to raise money for anything, including
00:44:05.610 --> 00:44:10.130
SSA. Well, my intuition was informed by certain
00:44:10.130 --> 00:44:13.599
quote facts, such as only 2 % to 3 % of venture
00:44:13.599 --> 00:44:18.440
capital goes to women founded companies, much
00:44:18.440 --> 00:44:23.699
less minority women founded companies. And then
00:44:23.699 --> 00:44:27.139
we're also, we were still in the wake or the
00:44:27.139 --> 00:44:30.320
shadow of an Elizabeth home. And I'm dealing
00:44:30.320 --> 00:44:32.880
with a technology that, as you said yourself,
00:44:32.940 --> 00:44:35.500
sounds like science fiction, right? It takes
00:44:35.500 --> 00:44:39.900
some explaining, but it's very scientifically
00:44:39.900 --> 00:44:44.760
sound. But when it's category changing. So all
00:44:44.760 --> 00:44:47.280
of those things, quote, had informed my intuition
00:44:47.280 --> 00:44:52.260
in 2021. But they were all wrong on a lot of
00:44:52.260 --> 00:44:54.940
different levels as well. I thought I was being
00:44:54.940 --> 00:45:00.030
prudent, but really, it was just reinforcing
00:45:00.030 --> 00:45:06.230
these biases. And the funny thing is, I did something
00:45:06.230 --> 00:45:09.469
that I would have never advised a mentee of mine
00:45:09.469 --> 00:45:13.090
to do, which would be to recede into the background,
00:45:13.730 --> 00:45:16.610
thinking that this other strategy would make
00:45:16.610 --> 00:45:23.690
the company win. And that wasn't correct. Do
00:45:23.690 --> 00:45:27.519
you think entrepreneurship is innate? Were you
00:45:27.519 --> 00:45:30.679
always an entrepreneur, say, when you were in
00:45:30.679 --> 00:45:34.159
middle school in your teenage years, or do you
00:45:34.159 --> 00:45:37.739
think it can be learned? I would say I was always
00:45:37.739 --> 00:45:44.380
creative, slightly iconoclastic and moved outside
00:45:44.380 --> 00:45:49.099
the strictures and the structures of what was
00:45:49.099 --> 00:45:51.599
around me to create things, but I would have
00:45:51.599 --> 00:45:56.300
never labeled myself as an entrepreneur. And
00:45:56.300 --> 00:45:59.519
I've asked that same question, Rashad, are there
00:45:59.519 --> 00:46:02.280
people born to be this? I think it's along a
00:46:02.280 --> 00:46:04.039
spectrum. There are some people that you know
00:46:04.039 --> 00:46:07.199
that they could never work for anybody else,
00:46:08.159 --> 00:46:10.739
that they have to strike out on their own. But
00:46:10.739 --> 00:46:15.039
I think our current environment actually demands
00:46:15.039 --> 00:46:22.380
us all to be entrepreneurs. We don't have the
00:46:22.380 --> 00:46:29.780
stability of institutions and. Cultural and even
00:46:29.780 --> 00:46:34.639
work norms that we had even 30 years ago. So
00:46:34.639 --> 00:46:39.619
everybody now has to think in terms of the the
00:46:39.619 --> 00:46:42.679
entrepreneur and i don't want to say that rightly
00:46:42.679 --> 00:46:45.679
but i think is humans we actually are highly
00:46:45.679 --> 00:46:50.059
adaptable. We solve problems we do that every
00:46:50.059 --> 00:46:55.219
day. I say, moms are the best entrepreneurs,
00:46:55.420 --> 00:46:57.739
right? Like if you want something done, ask a
00:46:57.739 --> 00:47:01.739
busy mom, for example, because they've got to
00:47:01.739 --> 00:47:04.440
manage building up human beings what could be
00:47:04.440 --> 00:47:07.719
more complicated or complex than that. So I think
00:47:07.719 --> 00:47:10.659
I see those skills and capabilities in people
00:47:10.659 --> 00:47:17.440
every day. And I think the environment that we
00:47:17.440 --> 00:47:19.940
live in now demand more of that. And I think
00:47:19.940 --> 00:47:23.119
it's a human thing to create. And it's a human
00:47:23.119 --> 00:47:26.780
thing to build. I think we are made to be creators.
00:47:28.260 --> 00:47:31.539
We've just formed that way. We're designed that
00:47:31.539 --> 00:47:37.619
way. And so in as much as entrepreneurism is
00:47:37.619 --> 00:47:40.940
an expression of that, I think we all are naturally
00:47:40.940 --> 00:47:42.960
entrepreneurs, whether we call ourselves that
00:47:42.960 --> 00:47:48.239
or not. What do you think is the path to changing
00:47:48.239 --> 00:47:51.059
the statistic that only 2 % to 3 % of venture
00:47:51.059 --> 00:47:56.039
capital flows to women? And even substantially,
00:47:56.239 --> 00:48:01.460
I'm assuming a small minority of that flows to
00:48:01.460 --> 00:48:07.500
minority women. I wish I had a really good answer
00:48:07.500 --> 00:48:15.360
to that question. I think It's just a matter
00:48:15.360 --> 00:48:22.659
of normalizing the effort. I tend to find that
00:48:22.659 --> 00:48:26.760
separating out women founders hasn't been as
00:48:26.760 --> 00:48:29.019
effective for women founders as we think it might
00:48:29.019 --> 00:48:31.880
be, like having women only funds, for example.
00:48:32.960 --> 00:48:35.460
They tend to be under a different kind of microscope.
00:48:35.739 --> 00:48:38.480
and actually tend to be more risk averse, right?
00:48:38.480 --> 00:48:40.940
Because they have to, you know, they have to
00:48:40.940 --> 00:48:43.119
win. They have to get returns. There's also always
00:48:43.119 --> 00:48:46.500
that stigma if you're in this. So I'm a minority
00:48:46.500 --> 00:48:49.719
in India. And then I was a minority when I moved
00:48:49.719 --> 00:48:54.460
to Canada when I was 16. I was one of four brown
00:48:54.460 --> 00:48:58.639
people in my high school. Although I used to
00:48:58.639 --> 00:49:00.340
think of myself a minority. I don't think I am
00:49:00.340 --> 00:49:03.480
anymore. If you look at the CEOs of a lot of
00:49:03.480 --> 00:49:10.860
public companies. I think intuitively I agree
00:49:10.860 --> 00:49:14.440
that if there is a class of humans that is oppressed,
00:49:14.739 --> 00:49:17.639
and I agree, women and women minorities are,
00:49:18.340 --> 00:49:21.440
they need to be uplifted so they're no longer
00:49:21.440 --> 00:49:23.980
oppressed. That makes sense to me. I don't know
00:49:23.980 --> 00:49:27.460
anyone who would argue against that. I don't
00:49:27.460 --> 00:49:28.920
personally know. I'm sure there are people who
00:49:28.920 --> 00:49:33.699
would argue against that. how to do it is more
00:49:33.699 --> 00:49:36.000
difficult and I can only speak from personal
00:49:36.000 --> 00:49:40.739
experience just seeing a lot more brown male
00:49:40.739 --> 00:49:44.219
CEOs. I don't feel oppressed anymore and I'm
00:49:44.219 --> 00:49:47.039
not a minority anymore, right? And there was
00:49:47.039 --> 00:49:50.800
no category that I know of for that specific
00:49:50.800 --> 00:49:56.380
race and gender for venture funding. I think
00:49:56.380 --> 00:49:58.219
you bring up a very interesting point is having
00:49:58.219 --> 00:50:04.300
these categories does it kind of make people
00:50:04.300 --> 00:50:06.679
who belong to those categories more insecure
00:50:06.679 --> 00:50:09.860
that I got this funding or I got this job because
00:50:09.860 --> 00:50:14.519
of my demographics, but not because of my aptitude?
00:50:15.659 --> 00:50:17.760
So we would love for you to kind of maybe dig
00:50:17.760 --> 00:50:21.539
a little bit deeper and like, does it mean that
00:50:21.539 --> 00:50:23.980
we just don't do it externally and internally,
00:50:24.219 --> 00:50:28.280
you know, we still uplift people? who need to
00:50:28.280 --> 00:50:34.599
be uplifted. Yeah. I think it's both. I think
00:50:34.599 --> 00:50:41.000
you want to reach down and support talent where
00:50:41.000 --> 00:50:44.739
you find it, and then also recognize where some
00:50:44.739 --> 00:50:49.139
of those barriers and challenges might be. I
00:50:49.139 --> 00:50:52.599
was challenged recently by very profound work
00:50:52.599 --> 00:50:57.480
by my colleague, Siri Chalaxi, who is a researcher
00:50:57.480 --> 00:50:59.980
at the Harvard Kennedy School. And she just came
00:50:59.980 --> 00:51:03.719
out with a book called Make Work Fair. And it's
00:51:03.719 --> 00:51:05.960
really fascinating work. They were particularly
00:51:05.960 --> 00:51:09.719
looking at gender discrepancies, for example,
00:51:10.480 --> 00:51:14.300
in corporate leadership and latter. And they
00:51:14.300 --> 00:51:17.900
found that these very kind of data -driven interventions
00:51:17.900 --> 00:51:23.920
really worked to level things out. And it wasn't
00:51:23.920 --> 00:51:27.300
really about categorizing people and separating
00:51:27.300 --> 00:51:29.699
them into specific programs, et cetera. But it
00:51:29.699 --> 00:51:32.719
was really just creating practices just even
00:51:32.719 --> 00:51:38.599
by the way that you screen resumes and write
00:51:38.599 --> 00:51:46.019
job descriptions to not privilege any particular
00:51:46.019 --> 00:51:49.079
group, but actually make it make it more fair.
00:51:49.980 --> 00:51:55.579
And these resulted in very good outcomes for
00:51:55.579 --> 00:51:57.500
everybody involved in the organizations that
00:51:57.500 --> 00:51:59.980
they studied. And so I think there is one thing,
00:52:00.199 --> 00:52:03.320
as we are all building companies and organizations,
00:52:03.960 --> 00:52:07.860
we should be mindful about the policies and structures
00:52:07.860 --> 00:52:13.500
and who we hire. I have a number of other female
00:52:13.500 --> 00:52:17.619
CEO colleagues in biotech who are also aware
00:52:17.619 --> 00:52:20.820
of these issues. But then we talk about, for
00:52:20.820 --> 00:52:24.139
example, hiring. And then they'll, for example,
00:52:25.440 --> 00:52:29.039
pick a candidate over a really great candidate,
00:52:29.099 --> 00:52:30.900
maybe a more qualified candidate who was like
00:52:30.900 --> 00:52:34.000
a mom. But she couldn't start right at that time
00:52:34.000 --> 00:52:36.760
they wanted her to because she needed to factor
00:52:36.760 --> 00:52:40.880
in the school start times. And I thought, guys,
00:52:41.760 --> 00:52:45.840
why are we Why are we doing this? Right? Like,
00:52:45.840 --> 00:52:51.000
it's our job to think about, are we perpetuating
00:52:51.000 --> 00:52:56.639
things that actually are then holding back really
00:52:56.639 --> 00:53:02.340
great talent? Because we have these ideas that
00:53:02.340 --> 00:53:06.199
somehow our organizations would be better benefited
00:53:06.199 --> 00:53:09.900
by by some what what what difference does it
00:53:09.900 --> 00:53:12.409
make if you change that higher by like, six,
00:53:12.429 --> 00:53:15.510
eight weeks. And you got this really great person.
00:53:16.250 --> 00:53:21.869
But you're discounting her off the bat because
00:53:21.869 --> 00:53:28.530
you didn't want to take into account this one
00:53:28.530 --> 00:53:30.809
consideration. So we have to be very mindful
00:53:30.809 --> 00:53:34.469
of that. And human beings, they have babies.
00:53:35.670 --> 00:53:38.570
For example, just think on a very basic level.
00:53:40.480 --> 00:53:44.119
In most cultures around the world, the majority
00:53:44.119 --> 00:53:48.019
of that work or thinking around that falls to
00:53:48.019 --> 00:53:52.860
moms. Well, as companies, as leaders, have we
00:53:52.860 --> 00:53:55.659
factored that in? Are we ruling out talent by
00:53:55.659 --> 00:53:58.679
not being able to be flexible to ramp these really
00:53:58.679 --> 00:54:00.579
talented people? It's not even about their gender.
00:54:01.119 --> 00:54:05.840
They're talented. ramp them back into the workforce
00:54:05.840 --> 00:54:08.719
properly so that we can benefit from that talent
00:54:08.719 --> 00:54:11.099
and we create value out of that. This is not
00:54:11.099 --> 00:54:14.679
charity. This is good business. So I've thought
00:54:14.679 --> 00:54:18.139
about these questions for a while. And I think
00:54:18.139 --> 00:54:21.300
it's in building organizations too. When you're
00:54:21.300 --> 00:54:23.239
in charge of the policy and you're in charge
00:54:23.239 --> 00:54:28.099
of the hiring, not vibe hiring because we vibe
00:54:28.099 --> 00:54:31.579
with people who are like us. And when I think
00:54:31.579 --> 00:54:36.800
about our company how very different the people
00:54:36.800 --> 00:54:39.960
that were brought together are we share very
00:54:39.960 --> 00:54:43.719
similar values underneath but as people we are
00:54:43.719 --> 00:54:46.960
radically different and if it was on vibes it
00:54:46.960 --> 00:54:51.739
would not have happened and um but if it was
00:54:51.739 --> 00:54:54.880
on purpose if it's on creation of value like
00:54:54.880 --> 00:54:57.260
if we but these are the exact people that we
00:54:57.260 --> 00:55:00.780
need On board to create this thing and build
00:55:00.780 --> 00:55:03.840
it forward but it's definitely not on vibes and
00:55:03.840 --> 00:55:05.900
it's definitely not on similarities and we tend
00:55:05.900 --> 00:55:10.400
to over rotate towards. Would i be like buddies
00:55:10.400 --> 00:55:13.719
with that this person the thing is you grow into
00:55:13.719 --> 00:55:17.360
that relationship. We're built for connection
00:55:17.360 --> 00:55:19.980
and you tend to find people that you spend more
00:55:19.980 --> 00:55:23.519
time with somehow you would have never been friends
00:55:23.519 --> 00:55:26.179
with them maybe just walking across the street
00:55:26.179 --> 00:55:30.159
and meeting them but. But in a shared mission
00:55:30.159 --> 00:55:33.340
together, you're a brand of brothers. You're
00:55:33.340 --> 00:55:35.519
a band of brothers and sisters. And because you
00:55:35.519 --> 00:55:38.980
have the shared purpose. So yeah, I think being
00:55:38.980 --> 00:55:42.239
aware of our tendency towards vibe anything,
00:55:42.340 --> 00:55:45.860
right? And then stepping back and saying, hey,
00:55:45.980 --> 00:55:48.480
what if I thought about this in a more holistic
00:55:48.480 --> 00:55:53.440
way or in a bigger picture way to reflect my
00:55:53.440 --> 00:55:57.869
values in what I think is important? um, societally
00:55:57.869 --> 00:56:00.929
within my, the confines of my own company is,
00:56:00.929 --> 00:56:05.530
is a, was a place to start. I think this is a
00:56:05.530 --> 00:56:08.449
great place to end. Thanks so much for joining
00:56:08.449 --> 00:56:11.449
us today, Nikki. Rashad, it's been a real pleasure.
00:56:11.550 --> 00:56:12.469
Thanks for having me.
00:00:02.399 --> 00:00:05.580
Thanks for joining me today, Nikki. Hey, Rashad,
00:00:05.620 --> 00:00:10.060
great to be here. As we said today, you are leading
00:00:10.060 --> 00:00:14.199
a biotechnology startup at the forefront of medicine.
00:00:14.839 --> 00:00:19.850
How did you get here? Well, it's an interesting
00:00:19.850 --> 00:00:23.010
story. I actually am the co -founder and CEO
00:00:23.010 --> 00:00:25.649
of Swaza, which is based in Mountain View, California,
00:00:26.170 --> 00:00:28.690
Silicon Valley biotechnology startup. But how
00:00:28.690 --> 00:00:31.129
I came to it actually was as the first outside
00:00:31.129 --> 00:00:37.219
investor to the company. And the story really
00:00:37.219 --> 00:00:40.359
starts in COVID, as many of the stories today
00:00:40.359 --> 00:00:44.039
start. But in my case, in 2020 is the year that
00:00:44.039 --> 00:00:47.500
I call my Jobin year, because in that year, I
00:00:47.500 --> 00:00:51.659
lost my mom very early to COVID. To tell you
00:00:51.659 --> 00:00:54.240
how early it was when she passed in Virginia,
00:00:54.880 --> 00:00:58.159
they wrote about it in the Washington Post with
00:00:58.159 --> 00:01:01.679
two other people, because it was so exotic to
00:01:01.679 --> 00:01:05.150
actually have someone die from SARS -CoV -2.
00:01:05.569 --> 00:01:10.209
In that same year, I lost all of my dependents
00:01:10.209 --> 00:01:13.129
who lived with me. They were older dependents.
00:01:13.870 --> 00:01:18.090
And I suffered a head injury where I had to relearn
00:01:18.090 --> 00:01:21.349
how to walk again. I had so many different life
00:01:21.349 --> 00:01:23.969
changes in that one short period of time. I found
00:01:23.969 --> 00:01:28.950
myself at the end of 2020. alone with the mirror
00:01:28.950 --> 00:01:31.950
and God and asking the question, you know, when
00:01:31.950 --> 00:01:35.150
we lose those aspects of our identity that we
00:01:35.150 --> 00:01:38.950
define our daily lives by, then who are we really?
00:01:39.290 --> 00:01:42.450
And at the end of that time, I sort of just realized
00:01:42.450 --> 00:01:45.109
that, well, whatever I have or I haven't done
00:01:45.109 --> 00:01:46.969
or whatever I've achieved, I haven't achieved.
00:01:47.269 --> 00:01:51.250
I'm a steward. We don't really own anything.
00:01:51.829 --> 00:01:54.489
It's all on loan to us, time, money, resources,
00:01:55.189 --> 00:01:58.670
and talent. So I thought, well, what I need to
00:01:58.670 --> 00:02:01.069
do is basically spend whatever time I do have,
00:02:01.189 --> 00:02:03.950
whether it's 10 years or 100 years, it's all
00:02:03.950 --> 00:02:07.489
really short, building things that matter. And
00:02:07.489 --> 00:02:11.770
so I radically changed what my Focus was on,
00:02:11.770 --> 00:02:13.810
I radically changed the things I was investing
00:02:13.810 --> 00:02:17.490
in. I had a very different risk profile and risk
00:02:17.490 --> 00:02:21.550
appetite. And it wasn't really for money, but
00:02:21.550 --> 00:02:25.189
it was for impact. And so in parallel, at that
00:02:25.189 --> 00:02:28.449
same time, my co -founder Jay Rajadas had been
00:02:28.449 --> 00:02:32.889
rapidly trying to race against the clock to develop
00:02:32.889 --> 00:02:38.069
key technologies in response to COVID. a vaccine,
00:02:38.509 --> 00:02:41.050
a therapeutic, a number of other technologies.
00:02:41.250 --> 00:02:43.990
But the fourth technology he developed was this
00:02:43.990 --> 00:02:47.889
nanofluid breathing aid technology. And so when
00:02:47.889 --> 00:02:51.990
we met and converged, it really was about time
00:02:51.990 --> 00:02:58.289
and purpose. And I saw the utility of what we
00:02:58.289 --> 00:03:01.530
were doing in not only in respiratory care, but
00:03:01.530 --> 00:03:04.349
really the approach using these advanced drug
00:03:04.349 --> 00:03:07.530
delivery techniques to really create new kinds
00:03:07.530 --> 00:03:11.349
of therapeutics that really addressed the host
00:03:11.349 --> 00:03:15.090
or the person rather than specific underlying
00:03:15.090 --> 00:03:20.009
biochemical processes of disease as being not
00:03:20.009 --> 00:03:22.969
only very useful, but having huge utility and
00:03:22.969 --> 00:03:27.310
in meeting a huge unmet need. So my journey to
00:03:27.639 --> 00:03:31.240
this type of entrepreneurism rather than having
00:03:31.240 --> 00:03:35.099
it be a progression or departure from something
00:03:35.099 --> 00:03:38.159
that I had been doing before was more of a homecoming
00:03:38.159 --> 00:03:46.860
to a really intentional grounded and purposeful
00:03:46.860 --> 00:03:51.939
approach to not only investing my time but resources
00:03:51.939 --> 00:03:56.259
and an effort into. So when I came upon Swaza
00:03:56.259 --> 00:03:59.560
technology, it wasn't the question, should I
00:03:59.560 --> 00:04:03.259
do this? It was the question, how can I not do
00:04:03.259 --> 00:04:06.379
this? Because this matters. This is what I need
00:04:06.379 --> 00:04:09.479
to be called to build. And so that alignment
00:04:09.479 --> 00:04:13.699
of purpose, that alignment of mission was really
00:04:13.699 --> 00:04:16.699
what drove what drove all of this. Jay, who's
00:04:16.699 --> 00:04:18.819
the inventor of the technology, he spent his
00:04:18.819 --> 00:04:22.180
entire life creating life -giving therapeutics.
00:04:22.199 --> 00:04:25.459
And it's not for money or for fame. It's because
00:04:25.459 --> 00:04:30.240
he wants to see people benefit from good science
00:04:30.240 --> 00:04:34.649
and have better quality of life. So it's a real
00:04:34.649 --> 00:04:38.029
privilege to be able to do this and to represent
00:04:38.029 --> 00:04:41.949
a team of people who have decades of experience
00:04:41.949 --> 00:04:45.209
and passion creating therapeutics and regenerative
00:04:45.209 --> 00:04:51.589
biomaterials. I'm sorry to hear about your mom
00:04:51.589 --> 00:04:57.290
and your family. It sounds like you went through
00:04:57.290 --> 00:05:01.949
a very difficult time. to almost reprogram and
00:05:01.949 --> 00:05:05.889
rewire your thinking and your purpose to a different
00:05:05.889 --> 00:05:10.089
mission. If you're open, maybe talk to me about
00:05:10.089 --> 00:05:15.470
how did you think about purpose in life and how
00:05:15.470 --> 00:05:19.089
did that translate to different career opportunities
00:05:19.089 --> 00:05:26.149
you undertook before? It seems like you did amazing.
00:05:26.389 --> 00:05:30.810
work even before the COVID pandemic, and you
00:05:30.810 --> 00:05:34.430
continue to do amazing work after. To me, it
00:05:34.430 --> 00:05:37.329
looks almost like a linear trajectory, if I'm
00:05:37.329 --> 00:05:40.810
being frank with you, although I'll be in different
00:05:40.810 --> 00:05:44.850
industries and different radicals. How do you
00:05:44.850 --> 00:05:47.310
think about purpose now? And what advice do you
00:05:47.310 --> 00:05:50.730
have to say a 20 -year -old Nikki, if you had
00:05:50.730 --> 00:05:53.610
a chance to talk to her, what would you tell
00:05:53.610 --> 00:05:58.100
her about? purpose and maybe let's, you know,
00:05:58.199 --> 00:06:00.139
feel free to go into the personal side of things
00:06:00.139 --> 00:06:03.519
as well, but if you can give a synopsis on the
00:06:03.519 --> 00:06:07.370
career or the work side of things as well. Well,
00:06:07.629 --> 00:06:10.870
thanks, Rashad. I had been blessed with a very
00:06:10.870 --> 00:06:13.470
good career. I was good at what I did before.
00:06:13.470 --> 00:06:16.170
I was an executive leadership, particularly at
00:06:16.170 --> 00:06:19.269
the intersection of academia and entrepreneurship.
00:06:19.509 --> 00:06:23.670
We were building businesses spinning out of academia
00:06:23.670 --> 00:06:29.149
to actually scale up higher education. This was
00:06:29.149 --> 00:06:31.509
with the growth of online learning, with the
00:06:31.509 --> 00:06:37.050
growth of digital. textbooks, and the growth
00:06:37.050 --> 00:06:40.029
of competency -based education. So we were really
00:06:40.029 --> 00:06:42.389
one of the pioneers that ended up building an
00:06:42.389 --> 00:06:44.769
organization that was sold to University of Massachusetts
00:06:44.769 --> 00:06:49.470
in 2021. And so the educational mission, again,
00:06:49.910 --> 00:06:53.430
it ties back to a sense of purpose, a contribution
00:06:53.430 --> 00:06:59.310
to the world leadership. At the same time, I
00:06:59.310 --> 00:07:04.209
think, in the course of that career, which was
00:07:04.209 --> 00:07:06.750
very meaningful. I think we all reach these certain
00:07:06.750 --> 00:07:10.269
plateaus where you know that you're very good
00:07:10.269 --> 00:07:14.769
at it, but you're not learning more, and that
00:07:14.769 --> 00:07:18.350
the thing more that you should be doing may be
00:07:18.350 --> 00:07:22.089
outside of your comfort zone. And so I had reached
00:07:22.089 --> 00:07:25.509
that point at several different stages in my
00:07:25.509 --> 00:07:29.230
career. And I would always respond to that by
00:07:29.639 --> 00:07:33.199
stepping back and then seeing, given where I
00:07:33.199 --> 00:07:37.860
am right now, what can I do to explore these
00:07:37.860 --> 00:07:42.639
other aspects or talents that I want to cultivate?
00:07:43.579 --> 00:07:46.800
And who are the people that I should be doing
00:07:46.800 --> 00:07:49.620
that with? And that actually led me to a lot
00:07:49.620 --> 00:07:52.660
of my angel investing too. So prior to coming
00:07:52.660 --> 00:07:55.839
on board with Swaza, I had been doing a number
00:07:55.839 --> 00:08:02.060
of investments. investor with a little I, but
00:08:02.060 --> 00:08:05.300
you know, I had had the fortune of being just
00:08:05.300 --> 00:08:08.160
being in the Silicon Valley, right, persisting,
00:08:08.480 --> 00:08:10.519
getting getting some wins in that that area,
00:08:10.600 --> 00:08:13.319
which then, you know, rolled into my entrepreneurial
00:08:13.319 --> 00:08:17.139
journey at swaza. But to tell the 20 year old
00:08:17.139 --> 00:08:21.860
self, I actually have one of the really profound
00:08:21.860 --> 00:08:24.199
joys that I have is when I talk to young people.
00:08:24.519 --> 00:08:26.399
A couple of years ago, I was invited to University
00:08:26.399 --> 00:08:28.819
of Chicago at the Booth School of Business to
00:08:28.819 --> 00:08:30.759
meet with students there and talk to them about
00:08:30.759 --> 00:08:33.759
their journeys. And what I actually told those
00:08:33.759 --> 00:08:36.799
students, and this is something that I did after
00:08:36.799 --> 00:08:40.899
that profound year in 2020 at the end, was I
00:08:40.899 --> 00:08:45.879
sat and I made a list of everything that I wanted
00:08:45.879 --> 00:08:55.360
to do, be, and see like in terms of achievement
00:08:55.360 --> 00:08:58.940
and these are not necessarily a career achievements,
00:08:58.940 --> 00:09:02.759
but I didn't want to die before I knew this list
00:09:02.759 --> 00:09:07.299
of things that I had touched upon them and. It
00:09:07.299 --> 00:09:09.980
and it had to be a very honest list. It wasn't
00:09:09.980 --> 00:09:12.100
about what would look good to somebody on the
00:09:12.100 --> 00:09:16.159
outside. You know, the house car, everything
00:09:16.159 --> 00:09:18.679
that it wasn't from the outside in. It was from
00:09:18.679 --> 00:09:21.299
the inside out and having to sit and very be
00:09:21.299 --> 00:09:25.399
very honest with that list. And I sat at one
00:09:25.399 --> 00:09:28.320
point and I wrote and I kept writing and I kept
00:09:28.320 --> 00:09:33.720
writing just each line a different thing until
00:09:33.720 --> 00:09:37.139
I found myself starting to repeat things. That
00:09:37.139 --> 00:09:42.279
means I had exhausted that. And that became what
00:09:42.279 --> 00:09:47.360
I call the list, not very creative. But the interesting
00:09:47.360 --> 00:09:51.379
thing is when I committed to that sense of vision,
00:09:51.820 --> 00:09:56.799
that real true heart list, that's when everything
00:09:56.799 --> 00:09:59.620
really shifted for me that brought me to this
00:09:59.620 --> 00:10:03.549
part of my journey. Some of the things on the
00:10:03.549 --> 00:10:06.250
list were actually quite outlandish and ridiculous,
00:10:06.610 --> 00:10:08.509
like things I would have never imagined happening,
00:10:09.110 --> 00:10:14.149
but they felt truly aspirational to me. And the
00:10:14.149 --> 00:10:16.190
interesting thing is that over the course of
00:10:16.190 --> 00:10:18.750
time, I started noticing even those outlandish
00:10:18.750 --> 00:10:21.850
things on the list actually start to happen,
00:10:21.889 --> 00:10:24.889
because there was a fundamental truth, I think,
00:10:25.309 --> 00:10:29.659
from the inside out and then connecting. With
00:10:29.659 --> 00:10:31.919
the world that you live in and the life that
00:10:31.919 --> 00:10:34.639
that you you live in it there's there's an alignment
00:10:34.639 --> 00:10:38.320
there so i tell young people. Spend time making
00:10:38.320 --> 00:10:42.679
that list and be 100 % honest with yourself and
00:10:42.679 --> 00:10:45.080
then if you think you want something stop and
00:10:45.080 --> 00:10:49.960
say why do i want that is is it because i'm supposed
00:10:49.960 --> 00:10:53.769
to want that. Because social media tells me to
00:10:53.769 --> 00:10:56.230
want it, or whatever, or my classmates in my
00:10:56.230 --> 00:10:57.830
grad school tell me that that's what I should
00:10:57.830 --> 00:11:02.970
aspire to, or do I really want it? And it can
00:11:02.970 --> 00:11:06.269
be simple things as well. So my list ranges from
00:11:06.269 --> 00:11:09.590
the outlandish, about building my company, et
00:11:09.590 --> 00:11:13.750
cetera, to just small daily rituals of like,
00:11:14.450 --> 00:11:16.830
well, I want to have nice flowers in my house
00:11:16.830 --> 00:11:20.230
every week. Like, down to that level of detail,
00:11:20.269 --> 00:11:22.990
it somehow is important to my soul. I put it
00:11:22.990 --> 00:11:26.710
on the list. So that's what I tell young people.
00:11:26.730 --> 00:11:28.909
And that's what I tell myself, because that was
00:11:28.909 --> 00:11:32.549
a transformative process for me. And I still,
00:11:33.269 --> 00:11:36.750
every day, every morning, I put that list in
00:11:36.750 --> 00:11:40.529
front of me. Because you need that on the entrepreneurial
00:11:40.529 --> 00:11:43.370
journey, as you probably know yourself, to remind
00:11:43.370 --> 00:11:47.009
you, what am I doing? Why? Where does this come
00:11:47.009 --> 00:11:49.980
from? and every morning I put in front of me.
00:11:50.159 --> 00:11:55.019
And that's what orients my thinking that day.
00:11:57.200 --> 00:12:00.799
That's fascinating. And I'm someone who struggles
00:12:00.799 --> 00:12:04.320
with routine a lot. Every day is different, and
00:12:04.320 --> 00:12:08.330
I kind of like it that way. Which isn't ideal
00:12:08.330 --> 00:12:12.269
because often I get into Friday and I have 30
00:12:12.269 --> 00:12:17.289
things to do and I'm up till midnight. How do
00:12:17.289 --> 00:12:21.970
you think about routine and having say weekly
00:12:21.970 --> 00:12:25.750
or monthly goals or even daily goals as opposed
00:12:25.750 --> 00:12:29.970
to more going with the flow to an extent and
00:12:29.970 --> 00:12:32.370
just kind of seeing where the opportunities and
00:12:32.370 --> 00:12:35.480
problems lie in both here. personal and business
00:12:35.480 --> 00:12:39.600
life and dealing with those as they come? Yeah,
00:12:39.600 --> 00:12:41.220
that's a really good question because I think
00:12:41.220 --> 00:12:48.720
like you my natural tendency is to want to Not
00:12:48.720 --> 00:12:53.159
be limited by routine and then as an entrepreneur
00:12:53.159 --> 00:12:58.080
you can't really have professionally a routine
00:12:58.080 --> 00:13:01.120
as you would in a corporate environment where
00:13:01.820 --> 00:13:04.799
I know that these sort of set meetings are what
00:13:04.799 --> 00:13:08.039
I need to get to in order to, quote, do a good
00:13:08.039 --> 00:13:14.299
job. In a startup, which is not a company, it's
00:13:14.299 --> 00:13:16.519
a startup. It's building something that doesn't
00:13:16.519 --> 00:13:21.679
exist yet. You need to get to the milestone.
00:13:21.899 --> 00:13:25.159
You need to solve the problem. You need to address
00:13:25.159 --> 00:13:28.159
the the situation, whether it's equipment in
00:13:28.159 --> 00:13:31.519
your lab or if it's closing an investment. And
00:13:31.519 --> 00:13:33.659
those things can be very stochastic and they
00:13:33.659 --> 00:13:37.899
are the enemy of routine. What I found probably
00:13:37.899 --> 00:13:40.740
be more helpful rather than the routine itself
00:13:40.740 --> 00:13:47.919
is to have a very stable mental model about how
00:13:47.919 --> 00:13:51.360
you manage your objectives and time or effort
00:13:51.360 --> 00:13:55.299
rather. And I think effort and energy That's
00:13:55.299 --> 00:13:59.559
now what I think about things more. And so I
00:13:59.559 --> 00:14:02.519
was not, for example, prioritizing my health
00:14:02.519 --> 00:14:04.639
very early in the startup. It was all living
00:14:04.639 --> 00:14:07.379
very cognitively trying to just focus on the
00:14:07.379 --> 00:14:11.820
work of and the thousand different things that
00:14:11.820 --> 00:14:16.700
you need to pay attention to. But I realized
00:14:16.700 --> 00:14:20.000
that having a proper routine for my sleep, my
00:14:20.000 --> 00:14:24.440
diet, my exercise, if I didn't have that, then
00:14:25.289 --> 00:14:29.970
I couldn't support this cognitive life that had
00:14:29.970 --> 00:14:31.870
to drive. I couldn't make the right decisions.
00:14:32.090 --> 00:14:35.870
I couldn't have the right level of energy to
00:14:35.870 --> 00:14:41.570
do what I need to do. So it was more aligning
00:14:41.570 --> 00:14:46.049
to the bigger goal and then having that be what
00:14:46.049 --> 00:14:50.240
drives the sense of routine. And then also having
00:14:50.240 --> 00:14:52.980
some flexibility and then having those habits.
00:14:53.059 --> 00:14:56.299
So I like to think about things more in terms
00:14:56.299 --> 00:15:02.940
of a weekly container. What are the priorities
00:15:02.940 --> 00:15:06.940
for the week according to the role that I'm playing?
00:15:09.200 --> 00:15:15.940
And I'm a student of 1990s management theory.
00:15:16.779 --> 00:15:23.200
So like the Franklin Covies of the world, in
00:15:23.200 --> 00:15:28.679
1995, Intel had adopted this kind of universal
00:15:28.679 --> 00:15:30.840
time management system, which was called the
00:15:30.840 --> 00:15:33.039
Franklin system. This was ultimately acquired
00:15:33.039 --> 00:15:36.000
by Stephen Covering and became Franklin Covey.
00:15:36.000 --> 00:15:40.460
But that kind of model of having understanding
00:15:40.460 --> 00:15:46.000
what the important things are versus what's urgent.
00:15:46.730 --> 00:15:50.889
Did you explain the system to us? Yeah. So this
00:15:50.889 --> 00:15:54.450
paradigm is kind of understanding the difference
00:15:54.450 --> 00:15:56.370
between important and urgent. There are things
00:15:56.370 --> 00:15:58.870
that are both important and urgent. Those have
00:15:58.870 --> 00:16:01.950
to be top of mind. There are things that are
00:16:01.950 --> 00:16:05.730
urgent just because they're emerging contingencies
00:16:05.730 --> 00:16:09.009
and exigencies, but they're not necessarily important.
00:16:09.370 --> 00:16:11.909
They're little fires. But then there are things
00:16:11.909 --> 00:16:16.759
that are Neither important nor nor urgent or
00:16:16.759 --> 00:16:19.679
not strategic but oftentimes these take up a
00:16:19.679 --> 00:16:23.580
lot of our our time meaningless meanings pro
00:16:23.580 --> 00:16:27.610
forma kinds of things random emails but. because
00:16:27.610 --> 00:16:30.769
their activity, they can feel productive. And
00:16:30.769 --> 00:16:34.649
so the paradigm that I found very useful was,
00:16:34.750 --> 00:16:36.669
I think, one developed by Stephen Covey himself
00:16:36.669 --> 00:16:39.850
was called the big rocks, where you focus on
00:16:39.850 --> 00:16:42.629
what the big rocks are in your week, like the
00:16:42.629 --> 00:16:44.370
big things that you know have to get done that
00:16:44.370 --> 00:16:46.649
are really important. And then everything else
00:16:46.649 --> 00:16:50.509
gets organized around them. And then sort of
00:16:50.509 --> 00:16:53.669
organizing things by the week tend to be the
00:16:53.669 --> 00:16:58.250
right time scale for me, because then the day,
00:16:58.769 --> 00:17:01.629
you can slot things into the day. But as long
00:17:01.629 --> 00:17:04.029
as you feel that you are in the right direction
00:17:04.029 --> 00:17:06.910
for the week, I tend to find that that's been
00:17:06.910 --> 00:17:11.170
my sweet spot in terms of routines and in organizations.
00:17:11.450 --> 00:17:13.910
It's still a work in proc, still a work in process
00:17:13.910 --> 00:17:17.569
and progress. You know, I have colleagues who
00:17:17.569 --> 00:17:21.609
are very routinized, and I kind of admire them
00:17:21.609 --> 00:17:28.640
from afar for consistency. But that's what I
00:17:28.640 --> 00:17:34.900
do for me. There's a common mantra in this world
00:17:34.900 --> 00:17:36.960
or in this ecosystem that says, you know, move
00:17:36.960 --> 00:17:40.039
fast, break things, have a strong bias to action.
00:17:41.110 --> 00:17:44.430
And from an experiential perspective, I feel
00:17:44.430 --> 00:17:48.369
like that can go wrong very often in health care,
00:17:48.549 --> 00:17:51.369
because often you don't get second chances if
00:17:51.369 --> 00:17:54.950
you move fast or break things. And I have a very
00:17:54.950 --> 00:17:56.829
strong bias to action, so I have to temper this
00:17:56.829 --> 00:18:01.150
bias. Sometimes I need to plan a bit more before
00:18:01.150 --> 00:18:05.480
I launch a new product or even simple things
00:18:05.480 --> 00:18:08.180
like editing this podcast. I need to spend some
00:18:08.180 --> 00:18:12.200
time editing it and listening to it, coming up
00:18:12.200 --> 00:18:16.279
with some promotional materials. How do you think
00:18:16.279 --> 00:18:19.960
about bias to action versus bias to planning?
00:18:20.740 --> 00:18:23.819
I like Adam Grant's philosophy of moderate procrastination
00:18:23.819 --> 00:18:27.519
here. I don't know if I like it because that
00:18:27.519 --> 00:18:30.619
resonates with me, but how do you think about
00:18:30.619 --> 00:18:35.940
kind of these two opposites of planning or just
00:18:35.940 --> 00:18:40.920
acting right away? I think probably my experience
00:18:40.920 --> 00:18:44.920
is that overall a bias towards action tends to
00:18:44.920 --> 00:18:49.480
move the ball down the field. But a bias towards
00:18:49.480 --> 00:18:53.160
action isn't an excuse for lack of very intentional
00:18:53.579 --> 00:18:56.240
thinking and planning because you can move the
00:18:56.240 --> 00:18:58.380
ball the wrong direction. You could score the
00:18:58.380 --> 00:19:02.519
wrong goal, but probably on average, it's better
00:19:02.519 --> 00:19:07.960
to move than to keep still. That's just been
00:19:07.960 --> 00:19:14.859
my experience. I think procrastination is probably
00:19:14.859 --> 00:19:18.420
inevitable with any kind of thinking work that
00:19:18.420 --> 00:19:22.750
requires deep, deep thinking. And anywhere you're
00:19:22.750 --> 00:19:26.190
dealing with an unknown, that is, in fact, what
00:19:26.190 --> 00:19:29.970
you're mulling over. Where there could be multiple
00:19:29.970 --> 00:19:34.910
possibilities for a problem or a solution, you
00:19:34.910 --> 00:19:38.809
can't just act your way towards a solution sometimes.
00:19:38.809 --> 00:19:42.269
You have to think through, iterate, create small
00:19:42.269 --> 00:19:47.230
experiments, sort of test a hypothesis, and move
00:19:47.230 --> 00:19:52.819
forward. But I think the world as it's structured
00:19:52.819 --> 00:19:57.960
now is made for people who take action. And we
00:19:57.960 --> 00:20:01.279
know this intuitively. Is it always the most
00:20:01.279 --> 00:20:06.200
clever, the most competent, the most qualified
00:20:06.200 --> 00:20:15.880
who win the prize or win the game? No, it's often
00:20:15.880 --> 00:20:18.880
people who reach out and take. Take it right
00:20:18.880 --> 00:20:25.480
and that said. You know we want we want people
00:20:25.480 --> 00:20:28.240
to be thoughtful I don't believe in breaking
00:20:28.240 --> 00:20:31.700
things and we're in and you and I are in the
00:20:31.700 --> 00:20:37.220
sort of the health. You know field right where
00:20:37.220 --> 00:20:39.480
it's not about breaking things about first doing
00:20:39.480 --> 00:20:43.539
no harm and so. That's a guiding principle for
00:20:43.539 --> 00:20:46.299
us. Whatever we build, we need to make sure we
00:20:46.299 --> 00:20:50.680
spend the time. And if it takes longer, that
00:20:50.680 --> 00:20:54.920
it's 100 % absolutely safe. And it's 100 % absolutely
00:20:54.920 --> 00:20:57.799
we are confident that it's not going to cause
00:20:57.799 --> 00:21:01.460
harm. Or if there are harms, we understand every
00:21:01.460 --> 00:21:05.380
aspect of that potential harm. I think even if
00:21:05.380 --> 00:21:10.039
you're not building a medical technology, that's
00:21:10.039 --> 00:21:15.059
a good stance to adopt. And I think more builders,
00:21:15.279 --> 00:21:19.140
more engineers should think of that first. Why
00:21:19.140 --> 00:21:21.700
am I doing this? And what is the broader impact
00:21:21.700 --> 00:21:25.539
of what I'm doing? And therefore, I should force
00:21:25.539 --> 00:21:28.119
myself to slow down where it matters so that
00:21:28.119 --> 00:21:31.880
I don't create unintended consequences for what
00:21:31.880 --> 00:21:36.539
I build. Yeah, unintended consequences and downstream
00:21:36.539 --> 00:21:39.220
effects of what you build are critical in healthcare.
00:21:39.960 --> 00:21:42.099
You said something in the previous answer that
00:21:42.099 --> 00:21:45.740
I really like is activity can feel like progress.
00:21:45.940 --> 00:21:50.559
I feel like founders, sometimes they seek external
00:21:50.559 --> 00:21:53.019
validation more than internal validation. And
00:21:53.019 --> 00:21:55.140
by internal, I mean, internal company validation,
00:21:55.759 --> 00:21:58.900
which is, you know, does this drive revenue growth?
00:22:00.269 --> 00:22:03.069
Is the internal team aligned on the strategies
00:22:03.069 --> 00:22:06.109
we're foreseeing and is everyone happy? Is the
00:22:06.109 --> 00:22:09.829
team happy? Are we getting along? Sometimes I'll
00:22:09.829 --> 00:22:11.529
meet founders and then I see they're jumping
00:22:11.529 --> 00:22:14.329
from pitch competition to pitch competition and
00:22:14.329 --> 00:22:18.069
stage to stage and I go, oh no, these guys or
00:22:18.069 --> 00:22:21.970
these girls, they're going for the external validation
00:22:21.970 --> 00:22:26.470
of speaking on stage and winning. You know, usually
00:22:26.470 --> 00:22:29.130
these pitch competitions are $1 ,000 to $5 ,000
00:22:29.130 --> 00:22:33.569
as opposed to, and their team is staying back
00:22:33.569 --> 00:22:36.089
and working. And you can kind of see the path
00:22:36.089 --> 00:22:39.589
there. And usually it does not work out. Maybe
00:22:39.589 --> 00:22:43.049
let's give you a scenario. Let's say you got
00:22:43.049 --> 00:22:46.750
invited to JP Morgan Mainstage keynote speaker
00:22:46.750 --> 00:22:50.559
for Swaza. So something that maybe could. move
00:22:50.559 --> 00:22:52.819
the needle for revenue in some aspects, or at
00:22:52.819 --> 00:22:54.519
least from an investor perspective, although
00:22:54.519 --> 00:22:56.900
I would argue raising money is not the goal.
00:22:58.460 --> 00:23:01.660
It's a signal, but it doesn't really move the
00:23:01.660 --> 00:23:06.640
needle that much. There is some internal team
00:23:06.640 --> 00:23:11.460
dynamics at play that urgently happen that kind
00:23:11.460 --> 00:23:13.359
of need your attention to fix them. You know,
00:23:13.359 --> 00:23:16.240
your co -founders are fighting or something that
00:23:16.240 --> 00:23:18.960
I'm sure happens with every startup at some point.
00:23:19.720 --> 00:23:21.619
What do you pick and how do you kind of think
00:23:21.619 --> 00:23:24.880
about external validation and internal validation?
00:23:24.920 --> 00:23:27.039
And I'll kind of wrap this whole question up
00:23:27.039 --> 00:23:31.019
and with one more caveat, given that marketing
00:23:31.019 --> 00:23:35.460
matters and the world that we live in is designed
00:23:35.460 --> 00:23:38.539
where people make emotional decision and organizations
00:23:38.539 --> 00:23:41.400
make emotional decisions as well. And brand and
00:23:41.400 --> 00:23:47.680
marketing is important. I think your last caveat
00:23:47.680 --> 00:23:51.619
is so important and is so often under looked.
00:23:51.660 --> 00:23:55.279
And I'll get to that. But when you said JP Morgan
00:23:55.279 --> 00:23:58.799
main stage, sorry, the building can be on fire.
00:23:58.960 --> 00:24:02.579
I'll be on that main. that main stage. That's
00:24:02.579 --> 00:24:04.920
an opportunity you don't really pass up. But
00:24:04.920 --> 00:24:07.759
joking aside, that points to the bigger point,
00:24:07.819 --> 00:24:12.140
which is being selective about those stages.
00:24:12.359 --> 00:24:14.619
And you always have to tie it back to the mission
00:24:14.619 --> 00:24:16.099
of the company, what you're actually trying to
00:24:16.099 --> 00:24:22.900
achieve at that point. People and team, you're
00:24:22.900 --> 00:24:27.460
not going to achieve anything without them. making
00:24:27.460 --> 00:24:29.680
sure those things are taken care of. And we've
00:24:29.680 --> 00:24:36.680
had critical points where on the surface, all
00:24:36.680 --> 00:24:41.720
the external things were great. But I knew if
00:24:41.720 --> 00:24:47.420
we didn't address some internal dynamic, that
00:24:47.420 --> 00:24:53.339
surface success was going to disappear. quickly,
00:24:53.440 --> 00:24:57.960
or it would evaporate. And so sometimes doing
00:24:57.960 --> 00:25:01.420
the deep work of really realigning everybody,
00:25:02.980 --> 00:25:09.339
and myself included, actually, is important at
00:25:09.339 --> 00:25:12.640
key touch points. And then being able to also
00:25:12.640 --> 00:25:16.380
reflect back, because oftentimes, particularly
00:25:16.380 --> 00:25:19.880
in the startup world, we're running to the next
00:25:19.880 --> 00:25:23.079
thing. We're winning, but then there's you climb
00:25:23.079 --> 00:25:24.880
one mountain. You see the seven others. You've
00:25:24.880 --> 00:25:28.599
got to climb still and you don't stop. You have
00:25:28.599 --> 00:25:32.279
to stop and reflect back because you can't keep
00:25:32.279 --> 00:25:36.880
everybody with you, right? And with this, if
00:25:36.880 --> 00:25:40.420
you can't step back and and really in gratitude,
00:25:41.119 --> 00:25:44.319
see where you've come from that that that's really,
00:25:44.799 --> 00:25:48.440
really important. But your last point about.
00:25:48.680 --> 00:25:51.700
Well, the marketing and the story, I think there's
00:25:51.700 --> 00:25:56.359
obviously two extremes where when you say like,
00:25:56.420 --> 00:26:00.099
what gets measured gets done oftentimes in a
00:26:00.099 --> 00:26:05.339
very media rich environment and an information
00:26:05.339 --> 00:26:10.579
heavy environment. What you post and what seems
00:26:10.579 --> 00:26:14.839
external looks like what you're measuring. And
00:26:14.839 --> 00:26:18.539
then you create this self sustaining loop where
00:26:18.670 --> 00:26:21.730
the more you do that the more it seems like you're
00:26:21.730 --> 00:26:25.150
making progress and it it tells a good story
00:26:25.150 --> 00:26:30.349
but i i was recently in conversations with a
00:26:30.349 --> 00:26:34.089
very close friend who is the managing director
00:26:34.089 --> 00:26:37.869
of a big investment bank in new york that specializes
00:26:37.869 --> 00:26:41.630
in biotech and he offered me a cautionary tale
00:26:41.630 --> 00:26:46.390
which is from our perspective from the 45th floor
00:26:46.390 --> 00:26:49.049
of people who are going to be financing that
00:26:49.049 --> 00:26:53.369
last three rounds right before IPO or that acquisition.
00:26:54.049 --> 00:26:58.730
We see your activity as a distraction because
00:26:58.730 --> 00:27:01.750
for us we're running the core numbers on your
00:27:01.750 --> 00:27:05.890
primary program and is that particular asset
00:27:05.890 --> 00:27:09.490
going to make money and of sufficient multiples
00:27:09.490 --> 00:27:14.309
on our investment in order to justify the investment.
00:27:14.799 --> 00:27:19.940
And so it can look like and feel like you're
00:27:19.940 --> 00:27:22.759
doing a lot. But if you're ignoring your primary
00:27:22.759 --> 00:27:28.319
business and it's proper feeding and care, we
00:27:28.319 --> 00:27:30.839
are going to see that we can see it because we
00:27:30.839 --> 00:27:34.000
see it all the time. So he literally offered
00:27:34.000 --> 00:27:39.559
me a top down view as a cautionary reminder that
00:27:39.559 --> 00:27:43.140
the external validation and there are a lot of
00:27:44.019 --> 00:27:47.400
It's like founder culture or hustle culture is
00:27:47.400 --> 00:27:50.539
very external, right? I'm doing so much, and
00:27:50.539 --> 00:27:53.420
I'm in this city, and I'm that city. But in the
00:27:53.420 --> 00:27:56.359
end, you're running a business. And you're not
00:27:56.359 --> 00:27:58.759
just running one business. You're running multiple
00:27:58.759 --> 00:28:01.539
potential businesses backwards and forwards,
00:28:01.599 --> 00:28:03.680
because it could be a number of different things.
00:28:04.099 --> 00:28:07.319
And my job as the CEO is to understand every
00:28:07.319 --> 00:28:10.700
business this possibly could be. and then to
00:28:10.700 --> 00:28:13.779
build both forwards and backwards simultaneously
00:28:13.779 --> 00:28:19.420
to what those strategic options are. So as long
00:28:19.420 --> 00:28:21.859
as you can always come back to the center, am
00:28:21.859 --> 00:28:24.940
I moving the right ball down the right field
00:28:24.940 --> 00:28:28.160
at the right pace? Then that's the guidepost.
00:28:28.200 --> 00:28:30.599
But you do have to check back in with yourself
00:28:30.599 --> 00:28:33.839
because you can end up spending two quarters
00:28:33.839 --> 00:28:39.819
on the big world tour and get a lot of press.
00:28:40.940 --> 00:28:44.579
But if that press doesn't translate into moving
00:28:44.579 --> 00:28:47.720
the core, the core business down the field or
00:28:47.720 --> 00:28:49.759
the primary program or whatever it is that you're
00:28:49.759 --> 00:28:51.960
actually supposed to be doing at that time, it
00:28:51.960 --> 00:28:56.940
can actually just be a distraction. What is the
00:28:56.940 --> 00:29:01.859
path to exit for swaza? Yeah, so there are a
00:29:01.859 --> 00:29:06.019
couple of different strategic option so that
00:29:06.019 --> 00:29:09.779
it's all situational based on where we find ourselves
00:29:09.779 --> 00:29:12.900
at different inflection points. So our primary
00:29:12.900 --> 00:29:15.460
assets was a one, which is the nanofluid breathing
00:29:15.460 --> 00:29:20.299
aid. We're accelerating that into phase two clinical.
00:29:21.380 --> 00:29:24.940
Studies within the next eighteen months. And
00:29:24.940 --> 00:29:27.880
pending on early readout of those phase two studies
00:29:27.880 --> 00:29:31.960
there are a couple of options one is to already
00:29:31.960 --> 00:29:35.779
strategically partner with the big pharma to
00:29:35.779 --> 00:29:41.039
bring that asset to market to is to also or to
00:29:41.039 --> 00:29:46.670
seek. Then. funding from the public markets to
00:29:46.670 --> 00:29:49.269
then support later clinical trials, which is
00:29:49.269 --> 00:29:53.309
sort of a classic biotech playbook. But this
00:29:53.309 --> 00:29:59.990
was pre -COVID playbook. So you and your audience
00:29:59.990 --> 00:30:02.009
may have heard of Merck's recent acquisition
00:30:02.009 --> 00:30:07.529
of Verona Therapeutics and for their first in
00:30:07.529 --> 00:30:13.799
class COPD drug. And Verona was one of these
00:30:13.799 --> 00:30:16.559
companies that had very good early phase two
00:30:16.559 --> 00:30:20.299
readout. They went public on the NASDAQ in 2017,
00:30:21.079 --> 00:30:24.200
raised $80 million, did their full clinical trials,
00:30:24.220 --> 00:30:26.839
and actually got the drug already approved in
00:30:26.839 --> 00:30:30.599
2024 by the FDA. And it was after that point
00:30:30.599 --> 00:30:33.440
that Merck went in and then acquired them for
00:30:33.440 --> 00:30:38.000
$10 billion. So many multiples over what Merck
00:30:38.000 --> 00:30:40.700
might have had to pay if they had come in earlier.
00:30:41.180 --> 00:30:43.519
Big pharmas, the cost of capital for them is
00:30:43.519 --> 00:30:46.940
much smaller. They can afford to completely come
00:30:46.940 --> 00:30:50.240
into a de -risked asset and acquire it later.
00:30:50.500 --> 00:30:54.799
They have the cash to do that. But that's sort
00:30:54.799 --> 00:30:59.400
of a classic. strategic option for a company
00:30:59.400 --> 00:31:04.380
like Swaza. So it really depends on the gates
00:31:04.380 --> 00:31:07.319
where you cross. What we are hoping for is nice
00:31:07.319 --> 00:31:09.900
early phase two readout. What we would like to
00:31:09.900 --> 00:31:14.059
be able to do is leverage that into much larger
00:31:14.059 --> 00:31:17.339
capitalization to be able to then fuel not only
00:31:17.339 --> 00:31:19.940
that asset, but we have a number of other programs
00:31:19.940 --> 00:31:26.099
because we have technology for wound healing,
00:31:26.180 --> 00:31:29.019
for example, to suffuse wounds and burns with
00:31:29.019 --> 00:31:32.400
oxygen, replicating the benefits of hyperbaric
00:31:32.400 --> 00:31:35.700
oxygen therapy treatment without the hyperbaric
00:31:35.700 --> 00:31:37.940
oxygen chambers. You can imagine that this can
00:31:37.940 --> 00:31:40.799
be very useful for patients with diabetic ulcers,
00:31:41.160 --> 00:31:45.599
for which there actually aren't any topical specifically
00:31:45.599 --> 00:31:49.099
approved for that. Actually, you think of the
00:31:49.099 --> 00:31:54.609
current leading drugs for they actually indicate
00:31:54.609 --> 00:31:57.630
in the labeling that it's not really intended
00:31:57.630 --> 00:32:00.109
for use where there's poor vascularization, for
00:32:00.109 --> 00:32:02.470
example, which kind of defeats the point. That's
00:32:02.470 --> 00:32:05.849
an area of unmet need that we'd like to address.
00:32:06.490 --> 00:32:09.710
But we also have other advanced delivery technologies
00:32:09.710 --> 00:32:14.990
which are very promising that we want to advance.
00:32:15.069 --> 00:32:17.849
For example, being able to leverage the colon.
00:32:18.299 --> 00:32:21.519
for advanced drug delivery for a number of different
00:32:21.519 --> 00:32:26.039
indications to be able to bypass the liver. And
00:32:26.039 --> 00:32:29.400
then also, we have very advanced sublingual technologies,
00:32:29.539 --> 00:32:31.839
which we can load various peptides and molecules
00:32:31.839 --> 00:32:37.220
on. Again, minimally invasive, noninvasive, bypassing
00:32:37.220 --> 00:32:40.940
the GI tract and the liver. So inhalation route
00:32:40.940 --> 00:32:44.700
of drug delivery, also extremely promising for
00:32:44.700 --> 00:32:47.880
a number of things. So we have a number of really
00:32:47.880 --> 00:32:50.980
exciting projects that we are developing and
00:32:50.980 --> 00:32:53.740
pushing forward. And we want our first asset
00:32:53.740 --> 00:33:00.420
to be the Vanguard to be able to expand all of
00:33:00.420 --> 00:33:05.660
those technologies. For the physicians listening,
00:33:05.960 --> 00:33:09.380
I think we inherently recognize that ventilation
00:33:09.380 --> 00:33:14.180
is kind of the worst way to deliver oxygen. But
00:33:14.180 --> 00:33:18.519
we also then say, well, When we think of something
00:33:18.519 --> 00:33:24.160
like Swaza, you know, nanotherapeutics delivering
00:33:24.160 --> 00:33:27.119
oxygen to the alveoli, it sounds like science
00:33:27.119 --> 00:33:34.759
fiction. Talk to me about, yeah, just talk to
00:33:34.759 --> 00:33:38.480
me a bit more about the technology, about the
00:33:38.480 --> 00:33:41.339
delivery method, and then is the goal to then
00:33:41.339 --> 00:33:47.039
replace? ventilators and intubation and how do
00:33:47.039 --> 00:33:50.319
you kind of think about the initial clinical
00:33:50.319 --> 00:33:53.839
use case and then what's the blue ocean or blue
00:33:53.839 --> 00:33:57.819
sky scenario? Yeah, in essence what we've developed
00:33:57.819 --> 00:34:02.660
with SWASA is a topical breathing egg that comprises
00:34:02.660 --> 00:34:06.319
liquid nanoparticles that can enable dynamic
00:34:06.319 --> 00:34:09.519
gas exchange at the surface. of the lung. So
00:34:09.519 --> 00:34:12.400
we're actually addressing the physical barriers,
00:34:13.119 --> 00:34:15.480
the key universal features of lung injuries.
00:34:15.539 --> 00:34:19.139
So you have fluid buildup, protein buildup, and
00:34:19.139 --> 00:34:21.579
oftentimes scar tissue at the surface, which
00:34:21.579 --> 00:34:24.980
are a physical block from oxygen coming in and
00:34:24.980 --> 00:34:28.820
carbon dioxide leaving. And so what we've done
00:34:28.820 --> 00:34:33.230
with this technology is actually leverage technology
00:34:33.230 --> 00:34:35.409
that was actually developed in the 1960s by the
00:34:35.409 --> 00:34:38.909
US Navy, where they were really interested in
00:34:38.909 --> 00:34:41.309
media that you could breathe instead of air for
00:34:41.309 --> 00:34:44.670
deep sea submarine. So the concept of liquid
00:34:44.670 --> 00:34:48.409
breathing has been long known in literature,
00:34:48.429 --> 00:34:53.590
but has been very limited in practice because,
00:34:53.670 --> 00:34:58.409
well, as mammals, land mammals, we don't want
00:34:58.409 --> 00:35:01.489
to drown in fluid in order to breathe. And so
00:35:01.489 --> 00:35:04.710
this idea of replacing air with fluid one to
00:35:04.710 --> 00:35:07.550
one was the governing paradigm for the use of
00:35:07.550 --> 00:35:11.610
these materials. Our insight and where we turn
00:35:11.610 --> 00:35:14.809
this around was to say, well, what if we didn't
00:35:14.809 --> 00:35:17.210
actually replace the air with the fluid? But
00:35:17.210 --> 00:35:20.250
what if we use the fluid and encapsulate it in
00:35:20.250 --> 00:35:22.929
such a way where we can use it as a gas shuttle?
00:35:23.659 --> 00:35:27.079
And that's what we've done with Swaza. So this
00:35:27.079 --> 00:35:29.420
may be a silly question, but do we still need
00:35:29.420 --> 00:35:33.159
to inspire and expire? Do we still need the diaphragm
00:35:33.159 --> 00:35:35.619
moving up and down for this technology to work?
00:35:36.440 --> 00:35:39.639
Yes. And so it's working with how we breathe
00:35:39.639 --> 00:35:42.920
with our negative pressure diaphragmatic breathing.
00:35:43.440 --> 00:35:46.699
So the idea is when someone is under a certain
00:35:46.699 --> 00:35:51.050
amount of respiratory distress, if we can Use
00:35:51.050 --> 00:35:53.170
the diaphragmatic breathing, which actually provides
00:35:53.170 --> 00:35:57.710
the mechanical force necessary to power the particle,
00:35:57.789 --> 00:36:01.730
so to speak, to stir them in the alveoli. Then
00:36:01.730 --> 00:36:05.809
we can enable the diffusion of gas through those
00:36:05.809 --> 00:36:09.750
liquid and fibrotic barriers, and then sustain
00:36:09.750 --> 00:36:14.449
the person on their own breathing. while their
00:36:14.449 --> 00:36:16.869
clinicians are addressing the underlying cause
00:36:16.869 --> 00:36:19.909
of the inflammation or the sepsis or whatever
00:36:19.909 --> 00:36:24.050
is actually causing the injury. So this is addressing
00:36:24.050 --> 00:36:27.409
the gas exchange part. And it has to do with
00:36:27.409 --> 00:36:31.030
actually the material's very strong affinity
00:36:31.030 --> 00:36:34.590
for carbon dioxide is actually the driver for
00:36:34.590 --> 00:36:38.070
it. But under the atmospheric and physiological
00:36:38.070 --> 00:36:41.210
conditions that you would find in a human lung,
00:36:41.559 --> 00:36:44.940
what you would be doing is actually delivering
00:36:44.940 --> 00:36:48.480
oxygen and absorbing carbon dioxide and exhaling
00:36:48.480 --> 00:36:51.119
it. Where this technology is actually very exciting
00:36:51.119 --> 00:36:54.659
for us as well is that because it sequesters
00:36:54.659 --> 00:36:57.420
carbon dioxide in a situation where you have
00:36:57.420 --> 00:37:01.400
a hypercapnia or something like a COPD exacerbation,
00:37:01.440 --> 00:37:03.760
and this is when we're thinking blue sky, which
00:37:03.760 --> 00:37:07.230
is that could be very, very useful. in dealing
00:37:07.230 --> 00:37:09.630
with those specific conditions and helping provide
00:37:09.630 --> 00:37:12.250
relief for those patients. But it was designed
00:37:12.250 --> 00:37:15.250
to be a breathing aid that could be used in austere
00:37:15.250 --> 00:37:18.010
environments. It's nebulized with simple jet
00:37:18.010 --> 00:37:20.150
nebulizers. Or basically, we actually have a
00:37:20.150 --> 00:37:22.949
device that's simple compressed air device, solar
00:37:22.949 --> 00:37:26.510
powered, battery powered, that if you were out
00:37:26.510 --> 00:37:31.349
in an area where you didn't have much infrastructure
00:37:31.349 --> 00:37:34.989
clinically, you could still apply this material.
00:37:36.380 --> 00:37:40.280
Now, I think the obvious use case is healthcare,
00:37:40.400 --> 00:37:42.679
but it seems like you've come across other use
00:37:42.679 --> 00:37:48.340
cases like defense and maybe travel or deep sea
00:37:48.340 --> 00:37:51.659
diving or altitude sickness. How do you think
00:37:51.659 --> 00:37:55.460
about go to market for a solution such as this,
00:37:55.500 --> 00:37:58.579
which could have potentially different use cases?
00:38:00.030 --> 00:38:02.730
Yeah, I think those are what we're exploring
00:38:02.730 --> 00:38:07.369
now. And actually, our work with NATO and the
00:38:07.369 --> 00:38:09.570
US Department of Defense is very synergistic
00:38:09.570 --> 00:38:13.250
in that, in being able to explore, for example,
00:38:14.070 --> 00:38:24.090
uses for high altitude or dive injury, but then
00:38:24.090 --> 00:38:28.909
also more broadly in the recovery of human performance
00:38:28.909 --> 00:38:32.570
to be able to repair lung tissue, for example,
00:38:32.750 --> 00:38:37.210
after extreme exertions, or to be able to sustain,
00:38:37.210 --> 00:38:41.730
for example, VO2 max under extreme conditions.
00:38:42.170 --> 00:38:44.329
But just for the average person, for example,
00:38:44.539 --> 00:38:47.800
Many of us, I'm probably one of the people included,
00:38:48.059 --> 00:38:51.500
are at risk for being pretty hypoxemic on planes.
00:38:52.599 --> 00:38:55.619
Our blood oxygen just drops, for example. And
00:38:55.619 --> 00:38:57.360
for certain people with certain conditions, that
00:38:57.360 --> 00:39:03.139
can be very risky. For people over 65 who are
00:39:03.139 --> 00:39:05.980
very much at risk of ischemic heart disease,
00:39:06.239 --> 00:39:09.059
if you can imagine having this be portable with
00:39:09.059 --> 00:39:12.599
you in your undergoing an event to try to protect
00:39:12.880 --> 00:39:16.380
the heart tissue quickly while you get to the
00:39:16.380 --> 00:39:20.039
hospital or while you get to your clinician can
00:39:20.039 --> 00:39:22.360
mean the difference between that first heart
00:39:22.360 --> 00:39:28.739
attack and a second fatal one, for example. And
00:39:28.739 --> 00:39:32.699
so we, big picture, we envision this being something
00:39:32.699 --> 00:39:35.579
in the back of every ambulance and actually being
00:39:35.579 --> 00:39:38.480
carried by people who are at particular risk,
00:39:38.719 --> 00:39:42.599
sort of an EpiPen for oxygen, so to speak. That's
00:39:42.599 --> 00:39:45.659
sort of the big picture. And then if all the
00:39:45.659 --> 00:39:50.139
safety data, which we are confident actually
00:39:50.139 --> 00:39:53.719
can be supported by further study and validated,
00:39:55.019 --> 00:39:57.900
align, it's something that we would like to see
00:39:57.900 --> 00:40:02.000
broadly available to people for those uses. How
00:40:02.000 --> 00:40:07.300
do you think about intuition when building and
00:40:07.300 --> 00:40:12.489
selling in this industry? And maybe give us an
00:40:12.489 --> 00:40:15.889
example where you encountered something while
00:40:15.889 --> 00:40:20.130
building which challenged your intuition. And
00:40:20.130 --> 00:40:23.230
how did you kind of, so for me, I used to be
00:40:23.230 --> 00:40:29.369
a very intuitive person in terms of who to hire.
00:40:29.889 --> 00:40:32.829
And I've kind of been wrong so many times. So
00:40:32.829 --> 00:40:36.670
I think vibe hiring does not work, and you need
00:40:36.670 --> 00:40:40.329
a structured process. So I think it's hard to
00:40:40.329 --> 00:40:42.429
kind of know when to trust your intuition and
00:40:42.429 --> 00:40:48.050
when not to. Whereas maybe the easy or the lazy
00:40:48.050 --> 00:40:50.190
way is to always trust my intuition, because
00:40:50.190 --> 00:40:53.670
then I don't have to do the structured diligence
00:40:53.670 --> 00:40:57.230
on the back end of things. Yeah, so how do you
00:40:57.230 --> 00:41:01.679
think about intuition? And then like, yeah, just
00:41:01.679 --> 00:41:04.619
give me maybe an example where something happened
00:41:04.619 --> 00:41:07.360
and then you were like, oh, like intuitively
00:41:07.360 --> 00:41:13.739
this didn't make sense to me. Yeah. I mean, in
00:41:13.739 --> 00:41:16.840
a kind of scientific environment where there
00:41:16.840 --> 00:41:21.199
are a lot of unknowns, you often have to experiment
00:41:21.199 --> 00:41:25.260
your way forward. But I like what you said about
00:41:25.260 --> 00:41:27.340
intuition and just caused me to think, well,
00:41:27.340 --> 00:41:30.900
what do we really mean about intuition? And intuition
00:41:30.900 --> 00:41:34.500
is essentially a heuristic based on our informed
00:41:34.500 --> 00:41:41.679
choices and experiences. And so sometimes intuition
00:41:41.679 --> 00:41:45.539
can be a reflection of cognitive biases, which
00:41:45.539 --> 00:41:48.579
may not be helpful. And so I'll give you an example.
00:41:49.320 --> 00:41:53.019
I very early on in establishing the company as
00:41:53.019 --> 00:41:57.320
the investor, I did not have the plan of actually
00:41:57.320 --> 00:42:02.539
leading the company. What I did was I put in
00:42:02.539 --> 00:42:07.820
some initial capital, syndicated some investors
00:42:07.820 --> 00:42:12.400
from the Valley to come in early. And then I
00:42:12.400 --> 00:42:16.599
set about trying to hire the right CEO. And this
00:42:16.599 --> 00:42:20.280
was at the time, like late 2021, the public markets
00:42:20.280 --> 00:42:22.139
were already starting to tank a bit. And this
00:42:22.139 --> 00:42:25.460
was the very beginning of biotech winter. the
00:42:25.460 --> 00:42:27.780
early science had already been happening. So
00:42:27.780 --> 00:42:31.099
when I was calling sort of my Boston crew, Harvard
00:42:31.099 --> 00:42:34.199
Medical School crew, empty PhDs who had all the
00:42:34.199 --> 00:42:38.380
right kind of credentials done by a pharma startup
00:42:38.380 --> 00:42:40.800
before, they said, hey, Nikki, we really love
00:42:40.800 --> 00:42:42.599
this technology. We think it's great. We want
00:42:42.599 --> 00:42:45.280
to support you whenever we can. We do not want
00:42:45.280 --> 00:42:47.539
to have to raise money in this environment. So
00:42:47.539 --> 00:42:49.619
if you want us on board to do that, we'll help
00:42:49.619 --> 00:42:52.719
you. But we don't want to do that. And I said,
00:42:52.780 --> 00:42:57.199
well, that's the job. Right? And then so I thought,
00:42:57.280 --> 00:42:59.780
and at that point, what my intuition had told
00:42:59.780 --> 00:43:03.780
me was, well, look, Nikki, you need to get someone
00:43:03.780 --> 00:43:08.659
who fits a certain demographic profile, a certain
00:43:08.659 --> 00:43:13.340
pedigree, a certain look, a certain type, just
00:43:13.340 --> 00:43:15.380
fill in the blank of whatever cardboard cutout
00:43:15.380 --> 00:43:18.940
you think should be that founder to be able to
00:43:18.940 --> 00:43:22.559
raise money. And that's your job is to find that.
00:43:23.300 --> 00:43:26.539
And that, quote, intuition meant I wasn't that
00:43:26.539 --> 00:43:32.579
face. I wasn't that cardboard cut out. But somehow
00:43:32.579 --> 00:43:35.400
I thought that from behind a curtain, I was going
00:43:35.400 --> 00:43:39.260
to plan the roadmap, drive the roadmap, resource
00:43:39.260 --> 00:43:41.300
it with the right people, resource it with the
00:43:41.300 --> 00:43:45.449
right team. And yet somehow this other entity
00:43:45.449 --> 00:43:47.750
out there, this person who is supposed to be
00:43:47.750 --> 00:43:50.210
that right CEO was going to raise a bunch of
00:43:50.210 --> 00:43:53.269
money for the company. That turned out to be
00:43:53.269 --> 00:43:56.829
a massive mistake. Yeah. Yeah. Given your experience,
00:43:57.449 --> 00:43:59.610
like for me, you would be the cardboard cutter
00:43:59.610 --> 00:44:05.610
and the person to raise money for anything, including
00:44:05.610 --> 00:44:10.130
SSA. Well, my intuition was informed by certain
00:44:10.130 --> 00:44:13.599
quote facts, such as only 2 % to 3 % of venture
00:44:13.599 --> 00:44:18.440
capital goes to women founded companies, much
00:44:18.440 --> 00:44:23.699
less minority women founded companies. And then
00:44:23.699 --> 00:44:27.139
we're also, we were still in the wake or the
00:44:27.139 --> 00:44:30.320
shadow of an Elizabeth home. And I'm dealing
00:44:30.320 --> 00:44:32.880
with a technology that, as you said yourself,
00:44:32.940 --> 00:44:35.500
sounds like science fiction, right? It takes
00:44:35.500 --> 00:44:39.900
some explaining, but it's very scientifically
00:44:39.900 --> 00:44:44.760
sound. But when it's category changing. So all
00:44:44.760 --> 00:44:47.280
of those things, quote, had informed my intuition
00:44:47.280 --> 00:44:52.260
in 2021. But they were all wrong on a lot of
00:44:52.260 --> 00:44:54.940
different levels as well. I thought I was being
00:44:54.940 --> 00:45:00.030
prudent, but really, it was just reinforcing
00:45:00.030 --> 00:45:06.230
these biases. And the funny thing is, I did something
00:45:06.230 --> 00:45:09.469
that I would have never advised a mentee of mine
00:45:09.469 --> 00:45:13.090
to do, which would be to recede into the background,
00:45:13.730 --> 00:45:16.610
thinking that this other strategy would make
00:45:16.610 --> 00:45:23.690
the company win. And that wasn't correct. Do
00:45:23.690 --> 00:45:27.519
you think entrepreneurship is innate? Were you
00:45:27.519 --> 00:45:30.679
always an entrepreneur, say, when you were in
00:45:30.679 --> 00:45:34.159
middle school in your teenage years, or do you
00:45:34.159 --> 00:45:37.739
think it can be learned? I would say I was always
00:45:37.739 --> 00:45:44.380
creative, slightly iconoclastic and moved outside
00:45:44.380 --> 00:45:49.099
the strictures and the structures of what was
00:45:49.099 --> 00:45:51.599
around me to create things, but I would have
00:45:51.599 --> 00:45:56.300
never labeled myself as an entrepreneur. And
00:45:56.300 --> 00:45:59.519
I've asked that same question, Rashad, are there
00:45:59.519 --> 00:46:02.280
people born to be this? I think it's along a
00:46:02.280 --> 00:46:04.039
spectrum. There are some people that you know
00:46:04.039 --> 00:46:07.199
that they could never work for anybody else,
00:46:08.159 --> 00:46:10.739
that they have to strike out on their own. But
00:46:10.739 --> 00:46:15.039
I think our current environment actually demands
00:46:15.039 --> 00:46:22.380
us all to be entrepreneurs. We don't have the
00:46:22.380 --> 00:46:29.780
stability of institutions and. Cultural and even
00:46:29.780 --> 00:46:34.639
work norms that we had even 30 years ago. So
00:46:34.639 --> 00:46:39.619
everybody now has to think in terms of the the
00:46:39.619 --> 00:46:42.679
entrepreneur and i don't want to say that rightly
00:46:42.679 --> 00:46:45.679
but i think is humans we actually are highly
00:46:45.679 --> 00:46:50.059
adaptable. We solve problems we do that every
00:46:50.059 --> 00:46:55.219
day. I say, moms are the best entrepreneurs,
00:46:55.420 --> 00:46:57.739
right? Like if you want something done, ask a
00:46:57.739 --> 00:47:01.739
busy mom, for example, because they've got to
00:47:01.739 --> 00:47:04.440
manage building up human beings what could be
00:47:04.440 --> 00:47:07.719
more complicated or complex than that. So I think
00:47:07.719 --> 00:47:10.659
I see those skills and capabilities in people
00:47:10.659 --> 00:47:17.440
every day. And I think the environment that we
00:47:17.440 --> 00:47:19.940
live in now demand more of that. And I think
00:47:19.940 --> 00:47:23.119
it's a human thing to create. And it's a human
00:47:23.119 --> 00:47:26.780
thing to build. I think we are made to be creators.
00:47:28.260 --> 00:47:31.539
We've just formed that way. We're designed that
00:47:31.539 --> 00:47:37.619
way. And so in as much as entrepreneurism is
00:47:37.619 --> 00:47:40.940
an expression of that, I think we all are naturally
00:47:40.940 --> 00:47:42.960
entrepreneurs, whether we call ourselves that
00:47:42.960 --> 00:47:48.239
or not. What do you think is the path to changing
00:47:48.239 --> 00:47:51.059
the statistic that only 2 % to 3 % of venture
00:47:51.059 --> 00:47:56.039
capital flows to women? And even substantially,
00:47:56.239 --> 00:48:01.460
I'm assuming a small minority of that flows to
00:48:01.460 --> 00:48:07.500
minority women. I wish I had a really good answer
00:48:07.500 --> 00:48:15.360
to that question. I think It's just a matter
00:48:15.360 --> 00:48:22.659
of normalizing the effort. I tend to find that
00:48:22.659 --> 00:48:26.760
separating out women founders hasn't been as
00:48:26.760 --> 00:48:29.019
effective for women founders as we think it might
00:48:29.019 --> 00:48:31.880
be, like having women only funds, for example.
00:48:32.960 --> 00:48:35.460
They tend to be under a different kind of microscope.
00:48:35.739 --> 00:48:38.480
and actually tend to be more risk averse, right?
00:48:38.480 --> 00:48:40.940
Because they have to, you know, they have to
00:48:40.940 --> 00:48:43.119
win. They have to get returns. There's also always
00:48:43.119 --> 00:48:46.500
that stigma if you're in this. So I'm a minority
00:48:46.500 --> 00:48:49.719
in India. And then I was a minority when I moved
00:48:49.719 --> 00:48:54.460
to Canada when I was 16. I was one of four brown
00:48:54.460 --> 00:48:58.639
people in my high school. Although I used to
00:48:58.639 --> 00:49:00.340
think of myself a minority. I don't think I am
00:49:00.340 --> 00:49:03.480
anymore. If you look at the CEOs of a lot of
00:49:03.480 --> 00:49:10.860
public companies. I think intuitively I agree
00:49:10.860 --> 00:49:14.440
that if there is a class of humans that is oppressed,
00:49:14.739 --> 00:49:17.639
and I agree, women and women minorities are,
00:49:18.340 --> 00:49:21.440
they need to be uplifted so they're no longer
00:49:21.440 --> 00:49:23.980
oppressed. That makes sense to me. I don't know
00:49:23.980 --> 00:49:27.460
anyone who would argue against that. I don't
00:49:27.460 --> 00:49:28.920
personally know. I'm sure there are people who
00:49:28.920 --> 00:49:33.699
would argue against that. how to do it is more
00:49:33.699 --> 00:49:36.000
difficult and I can only speak from personal
00:49:36.000 --> 00:49:40.739
experience just seeing a lot more brown male
00:49:40.739 --> 00:49:44.219
CEOs. I don't feel oppressed anymore and I'm
00:49:44.219 --> 00:49:47.039
not a minority anymore, right? And there was
00:49:47.039 --> 00:49:50.800
no category that I know of for that specific
00:49:50.800 --> 00:49:56.380
race and gender for venture funding. I think
00:49:56.380 --> 00:49:58.219
you bring up a very interesting point is having
00:49:58.219 --> 00:50:04.300
these categories does it kind of make people
00:50:04.300 --> 00:50:06.679
who belong to those categories more insecure
00:50:06.679 --> 00:50:09.860
that I got this funding or I got this job because
00:50:09.860 --> 00:50:14.519
of my demographics, but not because of my aptitude?
00:50:15.659 --> 00:50:17.760
So we would love for you to kind of maybe dig
00:50:17.760 --> 00:50:21.539
a little bit deeper and like, does it mean that
00:50:21.539 --> 00:50:23.980
we just don't do it externally and internally,
00:50:24.219 --> 00:50:28.280
you know, we still uplift people? who need to
00:50:28.280 --> 00:50:34.599
be uplifted. Yeah. I think it's both. I think
00:50:34.599 --> 00:50:41.000
you want to reach down and support talent where
00:50:41.000 --> 00:50:44.739
you find it, and then also recognize where some
00:50:44.739 --> 00:50:49.139
of those barriers and challenges might be. I
00:50:49.139 --> 00:50:52.599
was challenged recently by very profound work
00:50:52.599 --> 00:50:57.480
by my colleague, Siri Chalaxi, who is a researcher
00:50:57.480 --> 00:50:59.980
at the Harvard Kennedy School. And she just came
00:50:59.980 --> 00:51:03.719
out with a book called Make Work Fair. And it's
00:51:03.719 --> 00:51:05.960
really fascinating work. They were particularly
00:51:05.960 --> 00:51:09.719
looking at gender discrepancies, for example,
00:51:10.480 --> 00:51:14.300
in corporate leadership and latter. And they
00:51:14.300 --> 00:51:17.900
found that these very kind of data -driven interventions
00:51:17.900 --> 00:51:23.920
really worked to level things out. And it wasn't
00:51:23.920 --> 00:51:27.300
really about categorizing people and separating
00:51:27.300 --> 00:51:29.699
them into specific programs, et cetera. But it
00:51:29.699 --> 00:51:32.719
was really just creating practices just even
00:51:32.719 --> 00:51:38.599
by the way that you screen resumes and write
00:51:38.599 --> 00:51:46.019
job descriptions to not privilege any particular
00:51:46.019 --> 00:51:49.079
group, but actually make it make it more fair.
00:51:49.980 --> 00:51:55.579
And these resulted in very good outcomes for
00:51:55.579 --> 00:51:57.500
everybody involved in the organizations that
00:51:57.500 --> 00:51:59.980
they studied. And so I think there is one thing,
00:52:00.199 --> 00:52:03.320
as we are all building companies and organizations,
00:52:03.960 --> 00:52:07.860
we should be mindful about the policies and structures
00:52:07.860 --> 00:52:13.500
and who we hire. I have a number of other female
00:52:13.500 --> 00:52:17.619
CEO colleagues in biotech who are also aware
00:52:17.619 --> 00:52:20.820
of these issues. But then we talk about, for
00:52:20.820 --> 00:52:24.139
example, hiring. And then they'll, for example,
00:52:25.440 --> 00:52:29.039
pick a candidate over a really great candidate,
00:52:29.099 --> 00:52:30.900
maybe a more qualified candidate who was like
00:52:30.900 --> 00:52:34.000
a mom. But she couldn't start right at that time
00:52:34.000 --> 00:52:36.760
they wanted her to because she needed to factor
00:52:36.760 --> 00:52:40.880
in the school start times. And I thought, guys,
00:52:41.760 --> 00:52:45.840
why are we Why are we doing this? Right? Like,
00:52:45.840 --> 00:52:51.000
it's our job to think about, are we perpetuating
00:52:51.000 --> 00:52:56.639
things that actually are then holding back really
00:52:56.639 --> 00:53:02.340
great talent? Because we have these ideas that
00:53:02.340 --> 00:53:06.199
somehow our organizations would be better benefited
00:53:06.199 --> 00:53:09.900
by by some what what what difference does it
00:53:09.900 --> 00:53:12.409
make if you change that higher by like, six,
00:53:12.429 --> 00:53:15.510
eight weeks. And you got this really great person.
00:53:16.250 --> 00:53:21.869
But you're discounting her off the bat because
00:53:21.869 --> 00:53:28.530
you didn't want to take into account this one
00:53:28.530 --> 00:53:30.809
consideration. So we have to be very mindful
00:53:30.809 --> 00:53:34.469
of that. And human beings, they have babies.
00:53:35.670 --> 00:53:38.570
For example, just think on a very basic level.
00:53:40.480 --> 00:53:44.119
In most cultures around the world, the majority
00:53:44.119 --> 00:53:48.019
of that work or thinking around that falls to
00:53:48.019 --> 00:53:52.860
moms. Well, as companies, as leaders, have we
00:53:52.860 --> 00:53:55.659
factored that in? Are we ruling out talent by
00:53:55.659 --> 00:53:58.679
not being able to be flexible to ramp these really
00:53:58.679 --> 00:54:00.579
talented people? It's not even about their gender.
00:54:01.119 --> 00:54:05.840
They're talented. ramp them back into the workforce
00:54:05.840 --> 00:54:08.719
properly so that we can benefit from that talent
00:54:08.719 --> 00:54:11.099
and we create value out of that. This is not
00:54:11.099 --> 00:54:14.679
charity. This is good business. So I've thought
00:54:14.679 --> 00:54:18.139
about these questions for a while. And I think
00:54:18.139 --> 00:54:21.300
it's in building organizations too. When you're
00:54:21.300 --> 00:54:23.239
in charge of the policy and you're in charge
00:54:23.239 --> 00:54:28.099
of the hiring, not vibe hiring because we vibe
00:54:28.099 --> 00:54:31.579
with people who are like us. And when I think
00:54:31.579 --> 00:54:36.800
about our company how very different the people
00:54:36.800 --> 00:54:39.960
that were brought together are we share very
00:54:39.960 --> 00:54:43.719
similar values underneath but as people we are
00:54:43.719 --> 00:54:46.960
radically different and if it was on vibes it
00:54:46.960 --> 00:54:51.739
would not have happened and um but if it was
00:54:51.739 --> 00:54:54.880
on purpose if it's on creation of value like
00:54:54.880 --> 00:54:57.260
if we but these are the exact people that we
00:54:57.260 --> 00:55:00.780
need On board to create this thing and build
00:55:00.780 --> 00:55:03.840
it forward but it's definitely not on vibes and
00:55:03.840 --> 00:55:05.900
it's definitely not on similarities and we tend
00:55:05.900 --> 00:55:10.400
to over rotate towards. Would i be like buddies
00:55:10.400 --> 00:55:13.719
with that this person the thing is you grow into
00:55:13.719 --> 00:55:17.360
that relationship. We're built for connection
00:55:17.360 --> 00:55:19.980
and you tend to find people that you spend more
00:55:19.980 --> 00:55:23.519
time with somehow you would have never been friends
00:55:23.519 --> 00:55:26.179
with them maybe just walking across the street
00:55:26.179 --> 00:55:30.159
and meeting them but. But in a shared mission
00:55:30.159 --> 00:55:33.340
together, you're a brand of brothers. You're
00:55:33.340 --> 00:55:35.519
a band of brothers and sisters. And because you
00:55:35.519 --> 00:55:38.980
have the shared purpose. So yeah, I think being
00:55:38.980 --> 00:55:42.239
aware of our tendency towards vibe anything,
00:55:42.340 --> 00:55:45.860
right? And then stepping back and saying, hey,
00:55:45.980 --> 00:55:48.480
what if I thought about this in a more holistic
00:55:48.480 --> 00:55:53.440
way or in a bigger picture way to reflect my
00:55:53.440 --> 00:55:57.869
values in what I think is important? um, societally
00:55:57.869 --> 00:56:00.929
within my, the confines of my own company is,
00:56:00.929 --> 00:56:05.530
is a, was a place to start. I think this is a
00:56:05.530 --> 00:56:08.449
great place to end. Thanks so much for joining
00:56:08.449 --> 00:56:11.449
us today, Nikki. Rashad, it's been a real pleasure.
00:56:11.550 --> 00:56:12.469
Thanks for having me.



